Cited by 55Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Racial differences in cyberbullying from the perspective of victims and perpetrators.

Kowalski, Robin M., Dillon, Edward, Macbeth, Jamie, Franchi, Madeleine, Bush, Marissa·2020·American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Abstract

Although cyberbullying has attracted a good deal of research attention in recent years, we know much less about how cyberbullying differs by race and ethnicity, and the few studies that have examined this topic have yielded conflicting findings. In the current study, 352 White and Black respondents answered questions about their victimization and perpetration experiences with both traditional bullying and cyberbullying. More than 80% of both White and Black participants indicated that they had been victims of traditional bullying, and over 45% had been victims of cyberbullying at least once. Fewer reported perpetrating either type of bullying. Texting and social media were the most common forms of technology used by both White and Black respondents as well as the most common venues by which cyberbullying occurred. For all participants, cyberbullying victimization was associated with greater suicidal ideation, and traditional bullying victimization was related to higher loneliness, depression, and suicidal ideation. At higher frequencies of traditional bullying victimization, Black respondents reported higher loneliness than did White participants. Understanding patterns of technology use and experiences with cyberbullying victimization and perpetration will help to inform effective strategies for prevention and intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ort0000492

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is possible that adolescents from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds who experience isolation, bullying, or discrimination in person may use screens to connect with others with similar backgrounds, which could buffer from depression, anxiety, and other symptoms of poor mental health.

    “However, it is possible that adolescents from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds who might experience isolation, bullying, or discrimination in person may use screens to connect with others with similar backgrounds, which could buffer from depression, anxiety, and other symptoms of poor mental health [125].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kowalski, R. M., Dillon, E., Macbeth, J., Franchi, M., & Bush, M.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Morgan State University (US)
  • Smith College (US)
Venue
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Published
2020
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
644-652
ISSN
  • 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0025
OpenAlex
W3036041915
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, racial differences, Black adolescents, White adolescents, bullying victimization, bullying perpetration, suicidal ideation, loneliness, depression, social media, text messaging, traditional bullying, technology use
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Male, Students, United States, Universities, Crime Victims, Black People, White People, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review