Cited by 61Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Meta-analyses of the predictors and outcomes of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization while controlling for traditional bullying perpetration and victimization

Barlett, Christopher P., Kowalski, Robin M., Wilson, Annie M.·2024·Aggression and Violent Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2023.101886

Cites

244 of 244 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 247 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barlett, C. P., Kowalski, R. M., & Wilson, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Western Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Barlett, Christopher P.
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
74
Pages
101886
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387122109
Cited by
54
References
247
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 6
FWCI
16.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, traditional bullying, cyberbullying perpetration, cyber victimization, aggression, empathy, depression, anxiety, covariate control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review