Cited by 45Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

Stability and change in distress tolerance and its prospective relationship with borderline personality features: a short-term longitudinal study

Kiselica, Andrew M., Webber, Troy, Bornovalova, Marina A.·2014·Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment

Abstract

Distress tolerance (DT), or the ability to withstand psychological distress, has been proposed as a mechanism underlying multiple forms of psychopathology. However, research on DT is limited in several areas. First, stability and change of DT over time has never been assessed in adults. Second, it is unclear whether alternative conceptualizations of DT yield differences in longitudinal stability and change. Third, gender differences in DT have yet to be examined in nonclinical adult samples. And fourth, longitudinal predictive utility of DT has not been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study was to investigate these 3 questions using data collected at 3 time points over a 6-month period, examining borderline personality disorder (BPD) features as an outcome. Using 3 different measures of DT, results indicated that there is no mean level change in DT. Similarly, there was moderate rank-order stability in DT and no significant individual level change across measures. These findings suggest that DT is similar to other stable, trait-like constructs, as has been previously theorized. Next, a series of cross-lagged panel models revealed that although DT had a cross-sectional relationship with BPD features across all time points, DT did not predict BPD traits longitudinally. These findings have implications for treatments for BPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/per0000076

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low DT is associated with wide-ranging psychopathology, including SUDs, eating disorders, BPD, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

    “studies have shown low DT (i.e., distress intolerance) to be associated with wide-ranging psychopathology, including SUDs (McHugh and Kneeland, 2019), eating disorders (Lampard et al., 2011a), BPD (Kiselica et al., 2014)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiselica, A. M., Webber, T., & Bornovalova, M. A.
Venue
Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
Published
2014-07
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
247-256
ISSN
  • 1949-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-2723
OpenAlex
W2333609601
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
distress tolerance, borderline personality disorder, borderline personality traits, trait stability, longitudinal change, gender differences, cross-lagged panel model, non-clinical adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Emotions, Female, Frustration, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review