Cited by 35COVID-19 and Mental HealthMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsResilience and Mental Health

The mediating role of personalized psychological flexibility in the association between distress intolerance and psychological distress: A national survey during the fourth waves of COVID-19 pandemic in Iran

Open access
Akbari, Mehdi, Seydavi, Mohammad, Zamani, Elahe·2021·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Abstract The global COVID‐19 outbreak has put the human race's distress tolerance abilities to the test. And, the distress experienced getting worse with each pandemic wave; however, the more flexible the person, the greater the chance of surviving. Thus, the current study aimed to examine the mediating role of personalized psychological flexibility (PPF) in the link between distress intolerance to psychological distress during the fourth wave of the pandemic in Iran. A total of 576 individuals (Meanage 34.80, ±10.9, females 55.6%) took part in the online survey. In this national sample, PPF partially played a role in mediating the association mentioned above. Interestingly, this mediation was independent of demographic factors (age, gender, marital status, and educational level) and fear of COVID‐19, mindfulness, and satisfaction with life. So, despite the mentioned variables, accepting and using unpleasant emotions as fuel to achieve valued goals rather than avoiding them would mitigate the psychological distress during the pandemic. Consequently, public health services can aim to provide psychological flexibility enhancing interventions to decay COVID‐19‐related mental distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.2685

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akbari, M., Seydavi, M., & Zamani, E.
Affiliations
Kharazmi University (IR)
Corresponding author
Akbari, Mehdi
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1416-1426
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W3211120815
Cited by
31
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
distress intolerance, psychological distress, COVID-19 pandemic, mediation, emotional acceptance, mindfulness, life satisfaction, fear of COVID-19, Iranian population
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Female, Humans, Iran, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review