The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.
Open accessAbstract
Although the act of dehumanizing an outgroup is a pervasive and potent intergroup process that drives discrimination and conflict, no formal research has examined the consequences of being dehumanized by an outgroup-that is, "metadehumanization." Across 10 studies (N = 3,440) involving several real-world conflicts spanning 3 continents, we provide the first empirical evidence that metadehumanization (a) plays a central role in outgroup aggression that is (b) mediated by outgroup dehumanization, and (c) distinct from metaprejudice. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrate experimentally that Americans who learn that Arabs (Study 1a) or Muslims (Study 1b) blatantly dehumanize Americans are more likely to dehumanize that outgroup in return; by contrast, experimentally increasing outgroup dehumanization did not increase metadehumanization (Study 1c). Using correlational data, Study 2 documents indirect effects of metadehumanization on Americans' support for aggressive policies toward Arabs (e.g., torture) via Arab dehumanization. In the context of Hungarians and ethnic minority Roma, Study 3 shows that the pathway for Hungarians from metadehumanization to aggression through outgroup dehumanization holds controlling for outgroup prejudice. Study 4 examines Israelis' metaperceptions with respect to Palestinians, showing that: (a) feeling dehumanized (i.e., metadehumanization) is distinct from feeling disliked (i.e., metaprejudice), and (b) metadehumanization uniquely influences aggression through outgroup dehumanization, controlling for metaprejudice. Studies 5a and 5b explore Americans' metaperceptions regarding ISIS and Iran. We document a dehumanization-specific pathway from metadehumanization to aggressive attitudes and behavior that is distinct from the path from metaprejudice through prejudice to aggression. In Study 6, American participants learning that Muslims humanize Americans (i.e., metahumanization) humanize Muslims in turn. Finally, Study 7 experimentally contrasts metadehumanization and metahumanization primes, and shows that resulting differences in outgroup dehumanization are mediated by (a) perceived identity threat, and (b) a general desire to reciprocate the outgroup's perceptions of the ingroup. In summary, our research outlines how and why metadehumanization contributes to cycles of ongoing violence and animosity, providing direction for future research and policy. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,680
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996
Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 · Cited by 4,872
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?
Brewer, M. B. (1999) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126 · Cited by 3,494
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 6×
“…inmates as numbers, and sick individuals as “patients” may involve attributing them fewer traits unique to humans and central to our nature, reflecting a subtle denial of what it means to be fully human (e.g., Haslam, 2006; Waytz, Schroeder, & Epley, 2014; see also Bain, Vaes, & Leyens, 2014).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialJost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x · Cited by 2,883
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 · Cited by 2,714
Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364 · Cited by 2,680
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135 · Cited by 2,623
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bruneau, E., Jacoby, N., Kteily, N., Ligouri, L., & Saxe, R. (under review). Denying humanity: Denying humanity: The distinct neural correlates of blatant dehumanization. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Enyedi Zs., Erős F. & Fábián Z. (2001). Tekintélyelvűség és előítélet: Újabb magyarországi vizsgálatok. In Hunyadi Gy. & Nguyen Luu Lan Anh (Eds.) Sztereotípia-kutatás. Hagyományok és irányok (391-402). Budapest: Eötvös Kiadó.
- Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. (in press). The Nature of Social Dominance Orientation: Introducing the Social Dominance Orientation-7 Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
- Miranda, M., Gourveia-Pereira, M., & Vaes, J. (2014). When in Rome…Identification and acculturation strategies among minority members moderate the dehumanization of the majority outgroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44 (4), 327-336.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 376
Okeke, D. E., Boateng, M. A., Okpala, C. P., Ibiwoye, C., Okeke, A., Mbaye, O., & Obah, I. E. (2026) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393261426534 · Cited by 4
Dierckx, K., Hiel, A. V., Johnson, J. D., Lecci, L. B., Valcke, B., & Sekwena, E. K. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277077 · Cited by 4
Bilginoğlu, E., & Yozgat, U. (2022) · Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.11611/yead.898416 · Cited by 4
Enlarging the victim’s perspective on dehumanization
Stinglhamber, F., & Demoulin, S. (2023) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101248 · Cited by 4
Gallardo, R. A., Moore‐Berg, S. L., & Hameiri, B. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12905 · Cited by 6
Silva, C. D., Amadio, N., Sarg, R., Domingo, B., & Benbouriche, M. (2023) · Terrorism and Political Violence · doi:10.1080/09546553.2023.2248269 · Cited by 4
“7 Such a negative appraisal is demonstrated in a study conducted in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris amongst American participants 8 and was also observed in Yemen in relation to reformed extremists.”
Nshom, E. (2023) · Journal of Intercultural Communication · doi:10.36923/jicc.v23i4.140 · Cited by 5
Social media users' online behavior with regard to the circulation of hate speech
Megersa, T., & Minaye, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2023.1276245 · Cited by 5
Demoulin, S., & Stinglhamber, F. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12721 · Cited by 4
Smith, K. A., Boehne, S. D., Boley, B. B., & D’Angelo, G. J. (2024) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165241277347 · Cited by 4
“The predictive power of dominance motivation toward group-based hierarchy is strongly supported in the literature (Dhont et al., 2016, Kteily et al., 2016, Sibley & Duckitt, 2010).”
Jenkins, T. A., Pendlebury, H., & Smith, S. L. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70017 · Cited by 4
“Meta-dehumanization refers to an individual's perception that they, or a group they belong to, are seen as less than human by others (Bastian & Haslam, 2010; Kteily et al., 2016).”
Obedient Authoritarians or Lay Darwinists?
Bilewicz, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190685942.003.0002 · Cited by 5
Haji, R., McKeown, S., Matthews, A., & Platten, S. (2020) · Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology · doi:10.1037/pac0000501 · Cited by 4
Deceptive (De)humanization: How Lying About Perceived Outgroups is Revealed in Language
Markowitz, D. M. (2022) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x221117497 · Cited by 4
“…is important to note that prior work suggests dehumanization is often linked to negative feelings toward an outgroup (Bruneau, Jacoby, et al., 2018; Kteily et al., 2015, 2016; Kteily & Bruneau, 2017), and therefore this interaction effect may indicate one’s general negativity toward a target group…”
BackgroundLobato, R. M., Rodríguez-López, Á., García-Coll, J., Moyano, M., & Sainz, M. (2022) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2022.2137164 · Cited by 5
“In this vein, previous research identi fi es that people hold stronger negative feelings towards several types of o ff enders, such as sexual (Kernsmith et al., 2009; Shackley et al., 2014) or terrorist o ff enders (Kteily et al., 2016).”
Fontesse, S., Chevallereau, T., Stinglhamber, F., Demoulin, S., Fiorito, A. M., Chatard, A., Jaafari, N., & Maurage, P. (2023) · Journal of Addictive Diseases · doi:10.1080/10550887.2023.2292303 · Cited by 4
“15,18 Such consequences have also been reported in SAUD, 13 metadehumaniza-tion thus constituting a key variable in this disorder.”
Lelieveld, G., Noordewier, M. K., Doolaard, F. T., & van Dijk, E. (2024) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100182 · Cited by 4
Hamel, J., Villieux, A., Montalan, B., & Scrima, F. (2024) · Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations · doi:10.1016/j.pto.2024.01.001 · Cited by 4
Hodges, S. D., Kezer, M., Hall, J. A., & Vorauer, J. D. (2024) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence12020013 · Cited by 4
“…colleagues’ work (e.g., Vorauer and Kumhyr 2001; Vorauer et al. 1998, 2009) vividly illustrates the possible pitfalls of exaggerated negative metaperceptions— or other metaperceptual errors (Vorauer and Sakamoto 2006)—in intergroup exchanges (see also Bergsieker et al. 2010; Kteily et al. 2016).”
BackgroundHui, M. M. C., & Kung, K. T. F. (2025) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.70070 · Cited by 3
“Dehu-manization independently predicts hostility after controlling for prejudice (Goff et al. 2008; Kteily et al. 2015, 2016).”
Intergroup Meta-Respect Perceptions in a Context of Conflict
Nasie, M. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15111474 · Cited by 3
“In Kteily et al.’s (2016) study, American participants who learned that Muslims humanize Americans (meta-humanization through Ascent Dehumanization scale) humanized Muslims in turn.”
Sharing community life after a civil war: Intergroup contact and social distance
Alvarez, S. L., Sabogal, L. C. B., & Wolff, J. (2025) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/07388942251382732 · Cited by 3
“In extreme cases, othering can result in a dehumanization of outgroup members (Delgado Rodríguez et al., 2012; Kteily et al., 2016; Vaes et al., 2003).”
The Emergence of Belief Attribution and Dehumanization Are Associated
Zhou, W., & Hare, B. A. (2026) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.70165 · Cited by 3
Self-dehumanisation in voice hearers: the end of a continuum
O’Brien-Venus, B., Jenkins, T. A., & Chadwick, P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1173380 · Cited by 3
“Meta-dehumanisation is the perception of being dehumanised by others, for instance, believing that others perceive you, or a group you belong to, as lacking essentially or uniquely human characteristics (5, 6), and self-dehumanisation is the self-perception of being less than human (7).”
BackgroundSainz, M., Jiménez‐Moya, G., & Lobato, R. M. (2024) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1177/02134748231221465 · Cited by 3
“Sin embargo, somos conscientes de que la deshumanización del exogrupo produce un ciclo vicioso de meta-deshumanización intergrupal que erosiona la cohesión social (Kteily et al., 2016).”
İnsanın İnsana Ettiği: İnsandışılaştırma
Açıkgöz, B. (2024) · Çalışma ve Toplum · doi:10.54752/ct.1517551 · Cited by 3
Capozza, D., Colledani, D., & Falvo, R. (2024) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13060 · Cited by 5
Kim, S. Y., Nguyen, N. P., & Shigemoto, Y. (2025) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2025.2454701 · Cited by 3
Intergroup Conflict and Dehumanization
Haslam, N. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108894357.018 · Cited by 3
Blatant Dehumanization is Not Influenced by Dual Identity Labels: Evidence from the Canadian Context
Galang, C. M., Ku, M., & Obhi, S. S. (2021) · International Journal of Psychological Studies · doi:10.5539/ijps.v13n4p62 · Cited by 3
“For example, Kteily et al. (2016) showed that meta-dehumanization (i.e., knowing that one is being dehumanized by an outgroup) leads to reciprocal dehumanization; Kteily & Bruneau (2017) found that blatant dehumanization of Mexican immigrants and Muslims predicted support for Republican policies…”
BackgroundPica, G., & Fino, E. (2022) · International journal of psychological research · doi:10.21500/20112084.5695 · Cited by 3
“For example, Kteily et al. (2016) showed that individuals’ perceptions of being dehumanized by someone belonging to an assumed outgroup led those individuals to reciprocate the dehumanizing treatment and even to support violent and aggressive collective actions.”
BackgroundThe Telerobot Contact Hypothesis
Peled, A., Leinonen, T., & Hasler, B. S. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22015-9_5 · Cited by 3
Fontesse, S., Creupelandt, C., Bollen, Z., Pabst, A., & Maurage, P. (2023) · Alcohol · doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2023.09.007 · Cited by 3
COVID-19 Threat and Populism: The Mediation Effect of Epistemic and Significance Motivations
Molinario, E., Cicco, G. D., Sensales, G., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2024) · Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44073-1_4 · Cited by 6
Wuestenenk, N., van Tubergen, F., Stark, T., & Ellemers, N. (2024) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241259919 · Cited by 3
“Moreover, correcting for incorrect perceptions of how “others” see “you” (second-order beliefs) also reduces intergroup hostility (Kteily et al., 2016; Lees & Cikara, 2020).”
Norms of equality reduce prejudice towards migrants, but only among conservatives
Long, F., Pliskin, R., & Scheepers, D. T. (2024) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.2836 · Cited by 3
The Words of (Non-)Humanity: Sexist Slurs Elicit Self-Dehumanization in Women
Cervone, C., Lucarini, A., Casara, B. G. S., Filippi, S., Scatolon, A., & Bettinsoli, M. L. (2024) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x241292308 · Cited by 3
“In studies 2 and 3, we also predicted that the link between derogatory language and self-dehumanization may be mediated by meta-dehumanization, that is the perception that one is dehumanized by others (Kteily et al., 2016).”
Leidner, B., & Ginges, J. (2017) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12133 · Cited by 3
Constructing Intercultural Selves: Bridging Cultural Conflict Through Dialectical Engagement
Marginean, D., Derian, S. L., LaTorre, J., & Mascolo, M. F. (2019) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-019-00528-9 · Cited by 3
Lobato, R. M., & Sainz, M. (2021) · Studia Psychologica · doi:10.31577/sp.2021.03.827 · Cited by 3
Illusion of political tolerancePreprint
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Najle, M. B., & Gervais, W. M. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7bbba · Cited by 3
Proof of ID: Building Access and Personhood in the Social Service Ecosystem Through Exchange
Pierce, M. E. (2023) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/07439156231190310 · Cited by 3
“Prior research in intergroup relations has shown that experiencing dehumanization negatively impacts the victim ’ s well-being and identity (Bastian and Haslam 2011; Kteily, Hodson, and Bruneau 2016).”
BackgroundNshom, E. (2024) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101981 · Cited by 2
Lee, H., Kim, S., & Choi, E. (2025) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302251341808 · Cited by 2
“Although several studies have investigated the consequences of discrimination perceived by the majority (Barlow et al., 2012; Kteily et al., 2016; Leach et al., 2007), most have focused on racial or regional conflicts.”
Aligning source, appeal, and brand: Resolving the disclosure–effect dilemma in AIGC advertising
Gu, C., Li, X., & Xiang, Q. (2026) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2026.101598 · Cited by 3
The role of metadehumanization in explaining sacred conflict
Hartley, S., Percaya, A. P., & Fincher, K. M. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221099449 · Cited by 2
Guvensoy, I., Bağci, S. Ç., Turner, R. N., & Stathi, S. (2025) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302251315063 · Cited by 2
“While previous research has examined different types of metaperceptions in the literature such as meta-dehumanization (Kteily et al., 2016), meta-beliefs (e.g., Adra et al., 2020), and misper-ceived polarization (Lees & Cikara, 2021; also known as false polarization, Fernbach & van Boven, 2022), we…”
InfluentialDefusing political animosity in the United States with a cooperative online quiz game
Woodley, L., DeFilippis, E., Ravi, S., & Greene, J. D. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02225-2 · Cited by 2
Lutterbach, S., & Beelmann, A. (2025) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.10019 · Cited by 2
Quest for Significance and Violent Extremism
Molinario, E., Webber, D. J., Jaśko, K., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009407892.009 · Cited by 2
Effective to a fault: Organizational structure predicts attitudes toward minority organizations
Fath, S. B., Proudfoot, D., & Kay, A. C. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.003 · Cited by 2
Lane, D. S., Saleem, M., & Noor, M. (2019) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2019.1584570 · Cited by 2
“Empathy is generally considered a crucial component of successful intergroup reconciliation (Nadler & Liviatan, 2006), but in our studies its specific function appears to have been to counteract pre-existing perceptions ofMuslims as untrustworthy or incapable of experiencing uniquely human emotions (Kteily et al., 201…”
BackgroundTogether from Afar: Introducing a Diary Contact Technique for Improving Intergroup Relations
Jackson, J. C., Gelfand, M. J., Ayub, N., & Wheeler, J. (2019) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1353/bsp.2019.0002 · Cited by 2
Phillips, N. J., & Cromwell, A. (2020) · Journal of Peace Education · doi:10.1080/17400201.2020.1782181 · Cited by 2
“These ‘categories’ hold stereotypes, and the stereotypes for both minority youth and police officers have frequently been dehumanizing (Kelman 2004; Kteily, Hodson, and Bruneau 2016).”
The Potential of Telepresence Robots for Intergroup Contact
Peled, A., Leinonen, T., & Hasler, B. S. (2020) · International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications (CHIRA) · doi:10.5220/0010148102100217 · Cited by 2
“, seeing an outgroup member as non-human or less than human) is both a marker and a driver of intergroup conflict (Haslam, 2006; Kteily et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDittmann, A. G., Kteily, N., & Bruneau, E. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104056 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCognitive and neural bases of decision-making causing civilian casualties during intergroup conflict
Han, X., Zhou, S., Fahoum, N., Wu, T., Gao, T., Shamay‐Tsoory, S., Gelfand, M. J., Wu, X., & Han, S. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2
Werth, L., Seibt, B., & Mayer, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53899-9_5 · Cited by 2
The social evolution of distant othering and the racialized otherPreprint
Grell‐Brisk, M., Anderson, E. N., & Chase-Dunn, C. K. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/f7at8 · Cited by 2
Livingstone, A., Bedford, S. L., Afyouni, A., Vu, N., Kapantai, I., Makanju, D., Chayinska, M., González, R., Carozzi, P. J., Contreras, C., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5u7pa · Cited by 2
Addressing Online Political HostilityPreprint
Rasmussen, J. S. (2023) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/745px · Cited by 2
Rasset, P., Montalan, B., & Mange, J. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295617 · Cited by 1
“Regardless, people with FD feel dehumanized (i.e., metadehumanization [35]), which may lead them to perceive themselves as diminished human beings (i.e., self-dehumanization [36]).”
BackgroundRadicalization and Mental Health
Rosa, C. D., Fiorillo, A., VECCHIO, V. D., Catapano, P., Guadagno, D., Volpicelli, A., & Sampogna, G. (2024) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70165-8_13 · Cited by 1
Brown, E. R., Phills, C. E., & Veilleux, C. J. (2025) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2025.1376013 · Cited by 1
Things We Do, Costs We Yet Don’t Know: Social Sharing as a Catalyst of Service Sabotage
Xu, E., Ouyang, K., Huang, X., Shaw, J. D., & Lam, L. W. (2025) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1017/mor.2025.19 · Cited by 1
“Drawing on shared reality theory (Hardin & Conley, 2001; Hardin & Higgins, 1996) and recent developments in research on moral disengagement (Goff et al., 2008; Kteily et al., 2016), we highlight the important role of social sharing in shaping this relationship.”
Hsueh, T., Park, H. J., Veldman, J., & Kachanoff, F. J. (2025) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2025.2571544 · Cited by 1
“We assessed group members’ perception that their group is (dis)liked by other groups with a five-item scale adapted from Kteily et al. (2016) in Study 1a (α = .89).”
Reciprocal escalation of violent extremism: Experimental and longitudinal evidence from Denmark
Obaidi, M., Bergh, R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf338 · Cited by 1
“…that can produce reciprocal escalation, such as the extent to which one group’s negativity or perceptions of another group’s beliefs (i.e. meta-perceptions (23)) lead that group to display greater intergroup hostility (24, 25), they do not directly investigate the iterative escalation of conflict.”
From faces to faceless: visual framing of migrant children in British media
Çetin, C. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2594672 · Cited by 1
“…while others are anonymized, reflects long-standing intergroup dynamics (Struch and Schwartz 1989) and has measurable effects on both public attitudes and self-perceptions among marginalised groups (Kteily, Hodson, and Bruneau 2016; Ongenaert, Joye, and Machin 2023; Yang et al. 2015).”
Poppi, F. I. M. (2025) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405904.2025.2607009 · Cited by 1
Tausen, B. M., Alder, K., Asfaw, B., Parlane, T., & Ma, M. (2025) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.70012 · Cited by 1
Moreno-Gata, S., Rodríguez‐Torres, R., Betancor, V., & Pérez, A. R. (2026) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.70040 · Cited by 1
Segado-Boj, F., Quevedo, J. M., González-Aguilar, J.-M., & Jimeno, T. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1712927 · Cited by 3
Zohar, Y., Rozmann, N., & Gilat, S. (2026) · Israel Affairs · doi:10.1080/13537121.2026.2623507 · Cited by 1
‘They're eating our pets!’: When disgust and perceived cruelty combine to heighten prejudice
Kimel, S. Y., Kunst, J. R., Uenal, F., & Kim, V. (2026) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.70063 · Cited by 1
Dehumanization among children: Conceptualizations, measures and empirical findings
Khanjanian, M., Pouretemad, H., & Karimzadeh, O. (2026) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2026.101692 · Cited by 1
Dragojević, M., & Gasiorek, J. (2026) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x261439294 · Cited by 1
“…metastereotypes as a potentially important — and relatively accessible — target of future interventions aimed at reducing language-based prejudice and discrimination (for examples of metastereotype-based interventions for nonlinguistic groups, see Lees & Cikara, 2020; Kteily et al., 2016).”
When virtues are weaponized: Moral superiority aggravates outgroup dehumanization
Zhang, Z., & Chen, Z. (2026) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70140 · Cited by 2
“Previously, because the two aspects of dehumanization are strongly associated with each other (e.g., Crawford et al., 2013; Kteily et al., 2016, Study 5), numerous scholars have examined status in relation to dehumanization as an integrated construct encompassing both animalistic and mechanistic…”
Ideological differences in moral concern reflect circle expansion, not inversion
Law, K. F., Bae, S., Young, L., & Syropoulos, S. (2026) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70158 · Cited by 1
“…as globalization and the transition from tight kinship-based societies to more loosely connected ones have contributed to a historical broadening of the moral horizon, shifting concern away from parochialism and toward greater universalism (Enke, 2019; Kirkland et al., 2023; Kteily et al., 2016).”
Rasul, M. E., Hameiri, B., Hacohen, G., Malovicki-Yaffe, N., & Moore‐Berg, S. L. (2026) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70172 · Cited by 2
“…as perceptions of how much outgroup members dislike the ingroup (Moore-Berg, Ankori-Karlinsky, et al., 2020; Moore-Berg & Hameiri, 2024), while meta-dehumanization can be conceptualized as perceptions of how evolved or civilized outgroup members view the in-group (Kteily et al., 2015, 2016).”
Diponegoro, A. M., & Mujidin, M. (2018) · ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (ACPCH) · doi:10.2991/acpch-17.2018.1 · Cited by 1
Holden, M. A., Metcalf, B., Lawford, B. J., Hinman, R. S., Boyd, M., Button, K., Collins, N. J., Cottrell, E., Henrotin, Y. E., Larsen, J. B., et al. (2022) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2022.02.541 · Cited by 1
Monsters and the moral psychology of the “other”
Monteiro, B., West, B., & Pizarro, D. A. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-85667-6.00001-3 · Cited by 1
Missing a beam in thine own eye: Motivated perceptions of collective narcissism
Baba, J., Cichocka, A. K., & Cisłak, A. (2023) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231208398 · Cited by 1
“As past work showed that expecting an outgroup’s negative perception was associated with hostility toward that outgroup (Vorauer et al., 1998, 2000; see also Kteily & Bruneau, 2017; Kteily et al., 2016), future efforts should be turned to minimizing national narcissists’ perceptual biases.”
Górska, P., Bulska, D., & Górski, M. (2025) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.10282 · Cited by 1
Navigating the Threat Landscape
Obaidi, M., Kunst, J. R., & Myftari, K. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009407892.020 · Cited by 1
The Role of Dehumanization in Violent Extremism
Hodson, G., & Kteily, N. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009407892.021 · Cited by 1
Self-citationViolent Extremism and the Moral Landscape
Wig, T., & Obaidi, M. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009407892.012 · Cited by 1
El-Hout, M., & Salomon, K. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221098009 · Cited by 1
“Participants were asked to read a fabricated article (adapted from Kteily et al., 2016) purportedly written by the Pew Research Center that contained quotes from the American public who were surveyed on immigrants in the US.”
MethodTogether from afar: Introducing a Diary Contact Technique for Improving Intergroup Relations
Jackson, J. C., Gelfand, M. J., Ayub, N., & Wheeler, J. (2019) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1177/237946151900500103 · Cited by 1
Spatola, N., Marchesi, S., & Wykowska, A. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qaw3t · Cited by 1
Sainz, M. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/wscda · Cited by 1
How People Justify Online Political HostilityPreprint
Rasmussen, J. S. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/r3y5u · Cited by 1
Geflüchtete und wir – sozialpsychologische Perspektiven
Wagner, U. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-15741-8_10
Kruglanski, A. W., Webber, D. J., & Köehler, D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190851095.003.0006
Kruglanski, A. W., Webber, D. J., & Köehler, D. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190851095.003.0007
Cognitive and neural bases of decision-making causing civilian casualties during intergroup conflictPreprint
Han, X., Zhou, S., Fahoum, N., Wu, T., Gao, T., Shamay-Tsoory, S., Gelfand, M. J., Wu, X., & Han, S. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.04.411280
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0007
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0009
Metadata
- Authors
- Kteily, N., Hodson, G., & Bruneau, E.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Brock University (CA)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 343-370
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2296577595
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 64.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repository.upenn.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- intergroup aggression, intergroup conflict, outgroup prejudice, Arab-Muslim relations, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Roma, ISIS, Iran
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aggression, Female, Group Processes, Romani People, Humans, Hungary, Islam, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, United States, Arabs, Dehumanization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review