The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.
Open accessAbstract
Although the act of dehumanizing an outgroup is a pervasive and potent intergroup process that drives discrimination and conflict, no formal research has examined the consequences of being dehumanized by an outgroup-that is, "metadehumanization." Across 10 studies (N = 3,440) involving several real-world conflicts spanning 3 continents, we provide the first empirical evidence that metadehumanization (a) plays a central role in outgroup aggression that is (b) mediated by outgroup dehumanization, and (c) distinct from metaprejudice. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrate experimentally that Americans who learn that Arabs (Study 1a) or Muslims (Study 1b) blatantly dehumanize Americans are more likely to dehumanize that outgroup in return; by contrast, experimentally increasing outgroup dehumanization did not increase metadehumanization (Study 1c). Using correlational data, Study 2 documents indirect effects of metadehumanization on Americans' support for aggressive policies toward Arabs (e.g., torture) via Arab dehumanization. In the context of Hungarians and ethnic minority Roma, Study 3 shows that the pathway for Hungarians from metadehumanization to aggression through outgroup dehumanization holds controlling for outgroup prejudice. Study 4 examines Israelis' metaperceptions with respect to Palestinians, showing that: (a) feeling dehumanized (i.e., metadehumanization) is distinct from feeling disliked (i.e., metaprejudice), and (b) metadehumanization uniquely influences aggression through outgroup dehumanization, controlling for metaprejudice. Studies 5a and 5b explore Americans' metaperceptions regarding ISIS and Iran. We document a dehumanization-specific pathway from metadehumanization to aggressive attitudes and behavior that is distinct from the path from metaprejudice through prejudice to aggression. In Study 6, American participants learning that Muslims humanize Americans (i.e., metahumanization) humanize Muslims in turn. Finally, Study 7 experimentally contrasts metadehumanization and metahumanization primes, and shows that resulting differences in outgroup dehumanization are mediated by (a) perceived identity threat, and (b) a general desire to reciprocate the outgroup's perceptions of the ingroup. In summary, our research outlines how and why metadehumanization contributes to cycles of ongoing violence and animosity, providing direction for future research and policy. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,701
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996
Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 · Cited by 4,872
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?
Brewer, M. B. (1999) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126 · Cited by 3,494
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 6×
“…inmates as numbers, and sick individuals as “patients” may involve attributing them fewer traits unique to humans and central to our nature, reflecting a subtle denial of what it means to be fully human (e.g., Haslam, 2006; Waytz, Schroeder, & Epley, 2014; see also Bain, Vaes, & Leyens, 2014).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialJost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x · Cited by 2,883
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 · Cited by 2,714
Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364 · Cited by 2,680
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135 · Cited by 2,623
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bruneau, E., Jacoby, N., Kteily, N., Ligouri, L., & Saxe, R. (under review). Denying humanity: Denying humanity: The distinct neural correlates of blatant dehumanization. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Enyedi Zs., Erős F. & Fábián Z. (2001). Tekintélyelvűség és előítélet: Újabb magyarországi vizsgálatok. In Hunyadi Gy. & Nguyen Luu Lan Anh (Eds.) Sztereotípia-kutatás. Hagyományok és irányok (391-402). Budapest: Eötvös Kiadó.
- Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. (in press). The Nature of Social Dominance Orientation: Introducing the Social Dominance Orientation-7 Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
- Miranda, M., Gourveia-Pereira, M., & Vaes, J. (2014). When in Rome…Identification and acculturation strategies among minority members moderate the dehumanization of the majority outgroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44 (4), 327-336.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–376 of 376
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0010
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0003
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0005
Monroe, A. E., & Plant, E. A. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q8y45
Hunt, D. (2021) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7152-1.ch015
Delić, A., & Begić, S. (2021) · In medias res · doi:10.46640/imr.10.19.10
JUSTIÇA RESTAURATIVA: COVID-19 E SAÚDE MENTAL
Blood, R. L. P. Y., Filho, N. A. S., & Blood, M. R. Y. (2021) · Publicatio UEPG Ciencias Sociais Aplicadas · doi:10.5212/publicatioci.soc.v.29.2021.18272
Shackleford, C. M., Pasek, M. H., Vishkin, A., & Ginges, J. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kfypt
Diéguez, S. (2017) · Cerveau & Psycho · doi:10.3917/cerpsy.090.0094
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0001
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0002
Diversifying Perspectives in Political Psychology
Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.040
Peacebuilding More Successfully?
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0011
Adults and Children Blatantly Dehumanize OutgroupsPreprint
Zhou, W., & Hare, B. A. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-116610/v1
Hulbert, I. G. (2020) · doi:10.17760/d20394161
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0006
Jaśko, K., Webber, D. J., Molinario, E., Kruglanski, A. W., & Touchton-Leonard, K. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9qagp
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0004
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0008
Civitillo, S., Ialuna, F., Lieck, D., & Jugert, P. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ac2r4
Brik, T., Livingstone, A., Chayinska, M., & Bliznyuk, E. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u3z79
Loyal to a fault: Mistaken reputational pressures fuel partisan endorsement of winning at all costsPreprint
Dorison, C. A., & Kteily, N. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/27xyp
Self-citationTHE FACTORS OF INFRAHUMANIZATION OF RUSSIANS AND BELARUSIANS IN UKRAINIANS' PERCEPTION
Бондар, О. М., & Vinogradov, A. G. (2022) · Ukrainian Psychological Journal · doi:10.17721/upj.2022.2(18).1
The role of intergroup interaction in dehumanizing another person: experimental researchPreprint
Berks, E. A. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/x2egp
Sankaran, S. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3934402/v1
Efficacious methods of restraining COVID-19 through behavioral public policy
Управителев, А. А. (2023) · Journal of the New Economic Association · doi:10.31737/22212264_2023_4_203-222
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.002.0003
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.002.0006
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.002.0004
دور التجرد التنظيمي من الإنسانية كمتغير وسيط في العلاقة بين التنمر الوظيفي ودوران العمل
صالح, ص. أ. ف. م. (2024) · المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج · doi:10.21608/edusohag.2024.294758.1488
Impact of economic inequality on national stereotypes and dehumanization
Álamo-Hernández, A., Betancor, V., & Pérez, A. R. (2024) · Psychology Society & Education · doi:10.21071/pse.v16i2.17069
“In this study, we confirmed this hypothesis with responses to the Blatant Dehumanization Scale (Kteily et al., 2016) as participants attributed more humanity to countries with low inequality (Loughnan et al., 2014; Sainz et al., 2019).”
ResultHlushko, Y. R., Корніцька, В., & Vinogradov, A. G. (2024) · Ukrainian Psychological Journal · doi:10.17721/upj.2024.1(21).1
Malle, B., & Robbins, P. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108894357.015
Who considers migrants' competent traits important? The role of political ideology
Long, F., Ye, Z., & Liu, G. (2025) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113134
Balaghi, D., Cusick, K. M., Forbes-Dyczkowski, K., Harp, M., & Matanos, K. (2025) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/00221678251321194 · Cited by 1
Facing humanness: Facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanityPreprint
Deska, J. C., Lloyd, E. P., & Hugenberg, K. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5ak6b_v1
Who considers migrants' competence important? The role of political ideology
Long, F., Ye, Z., & Liu, G. (2025) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113272
Anderson, K., Flores‐Robles, G., & Wout, D. A. (2025) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506251348006
“Concerns about being perceived negatively could lead individuals to have negative perceptions of, less interest in befriending outgroup members, and increased dehu-manization of interaction partners (Doosje & Haslam, 2005; Kteily et al., 2016; Landry et al., 2023; Wout et al., 2014).”
Existential Isolation and Dehumanizing Self-PerceptionsPreprint
Espinosa, M., Bui, T., Tran, B. H. L., & Cox, C. R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5406300
Obaidi, M., & Kunst, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009407892.014
Obaidi, M., & Kunst, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009407892.005
Are sisters doing it for themselves? Feminists’ concern for issues that affect women and menPreprint
Chalmers, J., & Sutton, R. M. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7810239/v1
Racial differences in spontaneous usage of shared humanity appeals
Katzarska-Miller, I. I., & Reysen, S. (2025) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2025.2599123
Dehumanization as a Bridge Between Relationship Modes and Meaning in Life
Wang, J., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251396592
“Dehumanization not only directly hinders our well-being but also escalates social exclusion and aggression, forming a vicious cycle (Haslam, 2022; Haslam & Loughnan, 2014; Kteily et al., 2016); it thus threatens our very sense of self and sociality.”
Toprakkiran, S., Schachter, A., & Lai, C. K. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5934372
Understanding dehumanization: The role of agency and communionPreprint
Goldenberg, A., & Formanowicz, M. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
The metadehumanization induction task: a new paradigm to measure dehumanization feelings
Fontesse, S., Laniepce, A., & Maurage, P. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08510-7
“…without directly eliciting such feelings, manipulated metadehumanization at the participants’ ingroup level rather than at the individual level (Kteily et al., 2016 ; Borinca et al., 2021, 2024, 2025) or gave negative feedbacks to participants without directly and specifically manipulating…”
InfluentialBello, D. M., Lorenzo, M., Buraschi, D., & Delgado, N. (2026) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2026.102369
Bermúdez, G. (2026) · Psychoanalytic Perspectives · doi:10.1080/1551806x.2026.2590406
“…temperature of the field (Bermúdez, 2018): The more individuals and groups feel dehumanized or micro-dehumanized (Boulanger, 2012; Peskin, 2012), the more they resort to self-dehumanization, splitting, shaming, and From a Group Turn to a Field Turn retaliatory silencing (Kteily et al., 2015, 2016).”
Existential isolation and incel traits: Implications for men's well-being
Espinosa, M., & Cox, C. R. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.113723
Validation of the Korean version of the Self-Dehumanization Scale
Khosbayar, K., & Seo, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1754166
Doroszuk, M., Rupar, M., & Kossowska, M. (2026) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.70033
Prati, F., Cayir, B., Assche, J. V., & Rubini, M. (2026) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.70056
Ginges, J., Pasek, M. H., Vishkin, A., & Shackleford, C. M. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Bruneau, E., Moore-Berg, S., & Hameiri, B. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Self-citationTakes one to open many: A field study assessing a representative contact InterventionPreprint
Malovicki-Yaffe, N., Shuman, E., & Hameiri, B. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7459544
Unpacking mentalising through its denial: Integrating the roles of perceptual and contextual cues
Vaes, J., Ruzzante, D., & Biasiotti, C. (2026) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2026.2681343
Corbit, J. D., MacIntosh, T., & Muhammad, S. (2026) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.70236
“However, these benefits come at a cost: the same processes that enhance within-group cooperation can also foster antisocial behavior, dehumanization, and greater tolerance for the suffering of out-group members (Allport 1954 ; Buttelmann and Böhm 2014 ; Cikara et al. 2014 ; Kteily et al. 2016 ).”
Khorram‐Manesh, A., Cauwer, H. D., Barten, D. G., & Goniewicz, K. (2026) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-026-01226-8
Klein, N. D., & Hugenberg, K. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0351086
“Withholding humanity from others excludes them from the moral community facilitating harmful treatment [1–3].”
Humanizing the frontlines: individuating connections reduce customer mistreatment
Trinh, E. N., & Cunningham, J. L. (2026) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2026.104510
Post-Genocide Social Dynamics and Intergroup Trust
Moideen, R. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6486-5.ch009
When AI usage inspires or exhausts: Cognitive and motivational pathways to workplace well-being
Zhang, W., Qiu, T., & Gao, J. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09854-4
“…employees with a fixed mindset are less likely to adapt positively to new skill demands and more likely to interpret AI usage as involving replacement risk, loss of control, or status threat, thereby strengthening threat appraisals (Hong et al., 1999; Kteily et al., 2016 ; Złotowski et al., 2017 ).”
Perceived rivalry in intergroup conflict
Reinhard, D. A., Gianiodis, P. T., Hirschberger, G., & Leidner, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1875356
Nshom, E., Khalimzoda, I., & Shaymardanov, M. (2026) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc16080257
Tabri, N., Boutros, I., & Wohl, M. J. A. (2026) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.70108
The vicious cycle: Effect of sexual objectification on women's retaliatory dehumanization of men
Hu, B., Huang, Z., Huang, M., & Teng, F. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.114071
Bridging the Political Divide: Meta-Humanization and Moral Emotions Shape Partisan Reconciliation
Pavetich, M., & Stathi, S. (2026) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672261481208
Liu, C.-J., Han, S., & Hao, F. (2026) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2026.2733007
Hui, M. M. C., & Kung, K. T. F. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16101743
Guvensoy, I., Bağci, S. Ç., & Stathi, S. (2026) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.70102
Dierckx, K., & Hiel, A. V. (2026) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2026.102507
Metadata
- Authors
- Kteily, N., Hodson, G., & Bruneau, E.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Brock University (CA)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 343-370
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2296577595
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 64.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repository.upenn.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- intergroup aggression, intergroup conflict, outgroup prejudice, Arab-Muslim relations, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Roma, ISIS, Iran
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aggression, Female, Group Processes, Romani People, Humans, Hungary, Islam, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, United States, Arabs, Dehumanization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review