Because excellencism is more than good enough: On the need to distinguish the pursuit of excellence from the pursuit of perfection.
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
An unresolved and controversial issue in the perfectionism literature is whether perfectionism is beneficial, harmful, or unneeded. The Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (MEP) was recently developed to address this question by distinguishing the pursuit of perfection from the pursuit of excellence (Gaudreau, 2019). In this article, we report the results of the first empirical test of the core assumptions of the MEP. Across 5 studies (total N = 2,157), we tested the conceptual, functional, and developmental distinctiveness of excellencism and perfectionism. In Study 1, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with two samples supported the hypothesized two-factor structure of the newly developed Scale of Perfectionism and Excellencism (SCOPE). Study 2 provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity from scores obtained from the SCOPE, and showed that, over and above excellencism, perfectionism was not associated with additional benefits (e.g., life satisfaction) or harms (e.g., depression). Studies 3-4 focused on the academic achievement of undergraduates and showed that, compared to excellence strivers, perfection strivers more often aimed for perfect A+ grades (Study 3), but in fact achieved worse grades (Study 4). Study 5 adopted a four-wave longitudinal design with undergraduates and showed that excellencism and perfectionism were associated with an upward and a downward spiral of academic development. Overall, the results support the core assumptions of the MEP and show that perfectionism is either unneeded or harmful.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perfectionism and excellencism are significantly associated with correlations ranging from .34 to .51.
“Consequently, perfectionism and excellencism are significantly associated with correlations ranging from .34 to .51 (e.g. Gaudreau et al ., 2022; Goulet-Pelletier et al ., 2022).”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
The Descriptive Statistics sections report significant correlations between excellencism and perfectionism of r = .43 and r = .47 (both p < .001), supporting the association and values within the stated range. Our copy does not establish .34 and .51 as the range endpoints attributed to the cited studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExcellence strivers obtain better academic and creative achievement compared with perfection strivers.
“Studies have found that excellencism rather than perfectionism should be promoted among university students because excellence strivers obtain better academic and creative achievement compared with perfection strivers (e.g. Gaudreau et al ., 2022; Goulet-Pelletier et al ., 2022).”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
The Academic Achievement as a Continuum section reports that excellence strivers earned higher grades than perfection strivers. The Criterion-Related Validity section reports another study’s finding that excellence strivers were more creative, but describes creative thinking rather than creative achievement. This paper therefore supports the academic comparison, not the specific claim about creative achievement. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExcellence strivers have higher academic achievement, creativity, and self-compassion while showing lower fear of failure and need frustration compared with perfection strivers.
“Furthermore, excellence strivers have higher academic achievement, creativity, and self-compassion while showing lower fear of failure and need frustration compared with perfection strivers (Gaudreau et al ., 2022; Goulet-Pelletier et al ., 2022).”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
Perfectionism (but not excellencism) is significantly associated with the cognitive and social expressions of perfectionism known to be closely associated with psychological distress.
“At the empirical level, MEP studies have showed that perfectionism (but not excellencism) is significantly associated with the cognitive (e.g. doubts about actions, concerns over mistakes) and social (e.g. socially prescribed perfectionism, otheroriented perfectionism) expressions of perfectionism known to be closely associated with psychological distress (Gaudreau et al ., 2022).”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
Non-excellence/non-perfection strivers have lower academic achievement and creativity compared with excellence strivers.
“Their academic achievement and creativity are also lower compared with excellence strivers (Gaudreau et al ., 2022; Goulet-Pelletier et al ., 2022).”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
Non-excellence/non-perfection strivers have lower need for achievement, lower life-satisfaction, and make lower goal progress compared with both excellence and perfection strivers.
“studies showed that non-excellence/nonperfection strivers have lower need for achievement and lower life-satisfaction and they make lower goal progress compared with both excellence and perfection strivers (Gaudreau et al ., 2022).”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
Although Gaudreau (2019) formulated testable hypotheses, empirical examples are just starting to appear to orient empirical tests of these novel ideas.
“Although Gaudreau (2019) formulated testable hypotheses, empirical examples are just starting to appear to orient empirical tests of these novel ideas (e.g. Gaudreau et al ., 2022; Goulet-Pelletier et al ., 2022).”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
If excellencism can be associated with desirable outcomes, then too much reduction in excellencism could potentially be costly.
“On the other hand, if we accept that excellencism can be associated with desirable outcomes (e.g. Gaudreau et al ., 2022), then too much reduction in excellencism could potentially be costly.”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
Students entered the intervention with average score on excellencism.
“Consistent with scenario 3b, the students entered the intervention with average score on excellencism.”
From The impact of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism: a reinterpretation through the lens of the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (2024) · cites this paper as Gaudreau et al., 2022
The Descriptive Statistics section reports mean excellencism scores for the paper’s student samples, but not for students entering an intervention. The Design and Measures section describes a longitudinal study, not an intervention; no passage establishes the cited sentence’s baseline claim or its reference to scenario 3b (pages unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 86
Research works printed but not linked: 101
- Antony, M. M., & Swinson, R. P. (2009). When perfect isn't enough: Strategies for coping with perfectionism (2nd ed.). New Harbinger Publications.
- Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41, 1561-1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315591075 · DOI · Paper page
- Atkins, D. C., & Gallop, R. J. (2007). Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: A tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 726-735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.726 · DOI
- Ayearst, L. E., Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2012). Where is multidimensional perfectionism in DSM-5? A question posed to the DSM-5 personality and personality disorders work group. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 458-469. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026354 · DOI
- Barendse, M. T., Oort, F. J., & Timmerman, M. E. (2015). Using exploratory factor analysis to determine the dimensionality of discrete responses. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.934850 · DOI
- Blasberg, J. S., Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., Sherry, S. B., & Chen, C. (2016). The importance of item wording:The distinction between measuring high standards versus measuring perfectionism and why it matters. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34, 702- 717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916653701 · DOI · Paper page
- Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
- Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K., Field, J. G., & Pierce, C. A. (2015). Correlational effect size benchmarks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038047 · DOI · Paper page
- Bovaird, J. A., & Koziol, N. (2012). Measurement models for ordered-categorical indicators. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 495-511).
- Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2018). How to measure self-esteem with one item? validation of the German single-item self-esteem scale (G-SISE). Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9911-x · DOI
- Canning, E. A., LaCosse, J., Kroeper, K. M., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). Feeling like an imposter: The effect of perceived classroom competition on the daily psychological experiences of first-generation college students. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(5), 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619882032 · DOI
- Carraro, N., & Gaudreau, P. (2015). Predicting physical activity outcomes during episodes of academic goal conflict: The differential role of action planning and coping planning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1291-1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215594121 · DOI
- Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040- 3590.7.3.309 · DOI · Paper page
- Covington, M. V., & Müeller, K. J. (2001). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: An approach/avoidance reformulation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009009219144 · DOI
- Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Clara, I. P. (2002). The multidimensional structure of perfectionism in clinically distressed and college student samples. Psychological Assessment, 14, 365- 373. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.14.3.365 · DOI
- Damian, L. E., Stoeber, J., Negru-Subtirica, O., & Băban, A. (2017). On the development of perfectionism: The longitudinal role of academic achievement and academic efficacy. Journal of Personality, 85(4), 565-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12261 · DOI
- DiBartolo, P. M., & Rendón, M. J. (2012). A critical examination of the construct of perfectionism and its relationship to mental health in Asian and African Americans using a cross-cultural framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.007 · DOI
- Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., Holzberger, D., Kunina-Habenicht, O., Kunter, M., & Leutner, D. (2015). Beginning teachers' efficacy and emotional exhaustion: Latent changes, reciprocity, and the influence of professional knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Dunkley, D. M., & Blankstein, K. R. (2000). Self-critical perfectionism, coping, hassles, and current distress: A structural equation modeling approach. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 713-730. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005543529245 · DOI
- Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Endleman, S., Brittain, H., & Vaillancourt, T. (2021). The longitudinal associations between perfectionism and academic achievement across adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 01650254211037400. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254211037400 · DOI
- Feher, A., Smith, M. M., Saklofske, D. H., Plouffe, R. A., Wilson, C. A., & Sherry, S. B. (2019). The Big Three Perfectionism Scale-Short Form (BTPS-SF): Development of a brief self- report measure of multidimensional perfectionism. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919878553 · DOI
- Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2014). "The perils of perfectionism in sports" revisited: Toward a broad understanding of the pressure to be perfect and its impact on athletes and dancers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45(4), 395-407.
- Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2019). Reflections on three decades of research on multidimensional perfectionism: An introduction to the special issue on further advances in the assessment of perfectionism. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(1), 3- 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919881928 · DOI
- Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Blankstein, K. R., & Mosher, S. W. (1995). Perfectionism, life events, and depressive symptoms: A test of a diathesis-stress model. Current Psychology 14, 112-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686885 · DOI
- Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Heisel, M. J. (2014). The destructiveness of perfectionism revisited: Implications for the assessment of suicide risk and the prevention of suicide. Review of General Psychology, 18, 156-172. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000011 · DOI
- Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Nepon, T., & Besser, A. (2018). Perfectionism cognition theory: The cognitive side of perfectionism. In J. Stoeber (Ed.), The Psychology of Perfectionism: Theory, Research, Applications (pp. 89-110). Routledge.
- Flett, G. L., Mara, C. A., Hewitt, P. L., Sirois, F., & Molnar, D. S. (2016). How should discrepancy be assessed in perfectionism research? A psychometric analysis and proposed refinement of the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(7), 718-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916651382 · DOI
- Gaudreau, P. (2012). A methodological note on the interactive and main effects of dualistic personality dimensions: An example using the 2×2 model of perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.022 · DOI
- Gaudreau, P. (2013). The 2 x 2 model of perfectionism: Commenting the critical comments and suggestions of Stoeber (2012). Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 351-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.021 · DOI
- Gaudreau, P. (2019). On the distinction between personal standards perfectionism and excellencism: A theory elaboration and research agenda. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 195-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618797940 · DOI · Paper page
- Gaudreau, P. (2021). Separating the core definitional feature and the signature expressions of dispositional perfectionism: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Personality and Individual Differences, 181, 110975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110975 · DOI · Paper page
- Gaudreau, P., Franche, V., Kljajic, K., & Martinelli, G. (2018). The 2 × 2 model of perfectionism: Assumptions, trends, and potential developments. In J. Stoeber (Ed.), The Psychology of Perfectionism: Theory, Research, Applications (pp. 44-67). Routledge.
- Gaudreau, P., & Thompson, A. (2010). Testing a 2 x 2 model of dispositional perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 532-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.031 · DOI
- Germer, C. K., & Neff, K. D. (2013). Self-compassion in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(8), 856-867. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22021 · DOI · Paper page
- Gotwals, J. K., Stoeber, J., Dunn, J., & Stoll, O. (2012). Are perfectionistic strivings in sport adaptive? A systematic review of confirmatory, contradictory, and mixed evidence. Canadian Psychology, 53, 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030288 · DOI
- Goulet-Pelletier, J.-C., Gaudreau, P., & Cousineau, D. (2021). Is perfectionism a killer of creative thinking? A test of the model of excellencism and perfectionism. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12530 · DOI
- Greenspon, T. S. (2000). "Healthy perfectionism" is an oxymoron! Reflections on the psychology of perfectionism and the sociology of science. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2000-631 · DOI
- Greiff, S., & Heene, M. (2017). Why psychological assessment needs to start worrying about model fit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(5), 313-317. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000450 · DOI
- Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P. I., Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Kellar, I., Benn, Y., & Sheeran, P. (2016). Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta- analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 198-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000025 · DOI · Paper page
- Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! testing! one, two, three -Testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 841-850. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.001 · DOI
- Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117, 32-60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017668 · DOI · Paper page
- Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.60.3.456 · DOI · Paper page
- Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., Sherry, S. B., Habke, M., Parkin, M., Lam, R. W., McMurtry, B., Ediger, E., Fairlie, P., & Stein, M. B. (2003). The interpersonal expression of perfection: Perfectionistic self-presentation and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1303-1325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1303 · DOI · Paper page
- Hewitt, P. L., Habke, A. M., Lee-Baggley, D. L., Sherry, S. B., & Flett, G. L. (2008). The impact of perfectionistic self-presentation on the cognitive, affective, and physiological experience of a clinical interview. Psychiatry, 71(2), 93-122. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2008.71.2.93 · DOI
- Hill, A. P., & Curran, T. (2015). Multidimensional perfectionism and burnout: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315596286 · DOI · Paper page
- Hill, A. P., Mallinson-Howard, S. H., & Jowett, G. E. (2018). Multidimensional perfectionism in sport: A meta-analytical review. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(3), 235-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000125 · DOI
- Hill, A. P., Mallinson-Howard, S. H., Madigan, D. J., & Jowett, G. E. (2020). Perfectionism in sport, dance, and exercise: An extended review and reanalysis. In G. Tennenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (4th ed., pp. 121-157). Wiley.
- Hill, R. W., Huelsman, T. J., Furr, R. M., Kibler, J., Vicente, B. B., & Kennedy, C. (2004). A new measure of perfectionism: The Perfectionism Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_13 · DOI
- Hirsch, J. L., & Clark, M. S. (2019). Multiple paths to belonging that we should study together. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 238-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618803629 · DOI
- Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
- Kehayes, I.-L. L., Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Vidovic, V., & Saklofske, D. H. (2019). Are perfectionism dimensions risk factors for bulimic symptoms? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.022 · DOI
- Kruglanski, A. W., Köpetz, C., Bélanger, J. J., Chun, W. Y., Orehek, E., & Fishbach, A. (2012). Features of multifinality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312453087 · DOI
- Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001063 · DOI · Paper page
- Lang, J. W., & Fries, S. (2006). A revised 10-item version of the Achievement Motives Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.216 · DOI
- Leary, M. R., Patton, K. M., Orlando, A. E., & Wagoner Funk, W. (2000). The impostor phenomenon: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies. Journal of Personality, 68(4), 725-756. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00114 · DOI
- Locke, E. A. (2007). The case for inductive theory building. Journal of Management, 33(6), 867- 890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307307636 · DOI
- Luthar, S., Kumar, N., & Zillmer, N. (2019). High-achieving schools connote risks for adolescents: Problems documented, processes implicated, and directions for interventions. American Psychologist, 75(7), 983-995. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000556 · DOI
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
- Madigan, D. J. (2019). A meta-analysis of perfectionism and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 967-989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019- 09484-2 · DOI
- Marsh, H. W. (1994). Sport motivation orientations: Beware of jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16, 365-380.https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.16.4.365 · DOI
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181-220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700 · DOI
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). Five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 139-153).
- McGuire, W. J. (2004). A perspectivist approach to theory construction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 173-182.
- McNeish, D., An, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2018). The thorny relation between measurement quality and fit index cutoffs in latent variable models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1281286 · DOI
- McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2021). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000425 · DOI · Paper page
- Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4 · DOI · Paper page
- Newport, C. (2007). How to become a straight-A student: The unconventional strategies real college students use to score high while studying less. Three Rivers Press.
- Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 241-301. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082- 989x.5.2.241 · DOI · Paper page
- Osenk, I., Williamson, P., & Wade, T. D. (2020). Does perfectionism or pursuit of excellence contribute to successful learning? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 32(10), 972-983. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000942 · DOI · Paper page
- Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39, 313-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410060 · DOI
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · DOI · Paper page
- Rice, K. G., & Ashby, J. S. (2007). An efficient method for classifying perfectionists. Journal of Counseling Psychology 54, 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.72 · DOI
- Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002 · DOI · Paper page
- Sarkar, S. K., Midi, H., & Rana, S. (2011). Detection of outliers and influential observations in binary logistic regression: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(1), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2011.26.35 · DOI
- Schinka, J. A., & Borum, R. (1994). Readability of normal personality inventories. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6201_9 · DOI
- Schönbrodt, F. D., & Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 725-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.010 · DOI
- Sellbom, M., & Tellegen, A. (2019). Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1428-1441. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000623 · DOI
- Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Integrating behavioral-motive and experiential-requirement perspectives on psychological needs: A two process model. Psychological Review, 118, 552-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024758 · DOI
- Sherry, S. B., Hewitt, P. L., Sherry, D. L., Flett, G. L., & Graham, A. R. (2010). Perfectionism dimensions and research productivity in psychology professors: Implications for understanding the (mal)adaptiveness of perfectionism. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 42, 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020466 · DOI
- Sirois, F. M., & Molnar, D. S. (2016). Conceptualizations of perfectionism, health, and well- being: An introductory overview. In F. Sirois & D. S. Molnar (Eds.), Perfectionism, health, and well-being (pp. 1-24). Springer.
- Smith, M. M., Saklofske, D. H., Stoeber, J., & Sherry, S. B. (2016). The Big Three perfectionism scale: A new measure of perfectionism. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34, 670-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916651539 · DOI
- Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Ge, S. Y. J., Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., & Baggley, D. L. (2021). Multidimensional perfectionism turns 30: A review of known knowns and known unknowns. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000288 · DOI
- Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Ray, C., Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (2021). Is perfectionism a vulnerability factor for depressive symptoms, a complication of depressive symptoms, or both? A meta-analytic test of 67 longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 84, 101982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101982 · DOI
- Sorotzkin, B. (1985). The quest for perfection: Avoiding guilt or avoiding shame? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 22(3), 564-571. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085541 · DOI
- Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Pred, R. S. (1987). Impatience versus achievement strivings in the type A pattern: Differential effects on students' health and academic achievement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 522-528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.72.4.522 · DOI
- Stoeber, J. (2012). The 2×2 model of perfectionism: A critical comment and some suggestions. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 541-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.029 · DOI
- Stoeber, J. (2014). Perfectionism in sport and dance: A double-edged sword. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45(4), 385-394.
- Stoeber, J. (2018a). Comparing two short forms of the Hewitt-Flett Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. Assessment, 25, 578-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659740 · DOI
- Stoeber, J. (2018b). The psychology of perfectionism: An introduction. In J. Stoeber (Ed.), The psychology of perfectionism: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 3-16). Routledge.
- Stricker, J., Buecker, S., Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2019). Multidimensional perfectionism and the big five personality traits: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 33(2), 176-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2186 · DOI
- Stricker, J., Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2019). School satisfaction differentially predicts multidimensional perfectionism one year later. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.014 · DOI
- Terry-Short, L., Glynn Owens, R., Slade, P., & Dewey, M. (1995). Positive and negative perfectionism. Personality & Individual Differences, 18, 663-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)00192-U · DOI
- Travers, L. V., Randall, E. T., Bryant, F. B., Conley, C. S., & Bohnert, A. M. (2015). The cost of perfection with apparent ease: Theoretical foundations and development of the effortless perfectionism scale. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1147-1159. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000109 · DOI
- Turon, H., Carey, M., Boyes, A., Hobden, B., Dilworth, S., & Sanson-Fisher, R. (2019). Agreement between a single-item measure of anxiety and depression and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210111- e0210111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210111 · DOI
- Wade, T. D. (2018). Prevention of perfectionism in youth. In J. Stoeber (Ed.), The Psychology of Perfectionism: Theory, Research, Applications (pp. 265-283). Routledge.
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Sage.
- West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209-231). Guilford.
- Westrick, P. A., Le, H., Robbins, S. B., Radunzel, J. M. R., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). College performance and retention: A meta-analysis of the predictive validities of ACT® scores, high school grades, and SES. Educational Assessment, 20, 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.997614 · DOI
- Wilksch, S. M., Durbridge, M. R., & Wade, T. D. (2008). A preliminary controlled comparison of programs designed to reduce risk of eating disorders targeting perfectionism and media literacy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 47, 937-947. https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181799f4a · DOI
- Authors
- Gaudreau, P., Schellenberg, B. J. I., Gareau, A., Kljajic, K., & Manoni-Millar, S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1117-1145
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4214736673
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2015-0649)
- University of Ottawa
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- perfectionism, academic performance, academic self-concept, life satisfaction, depression, undergraduate students
- MeSH terms
- Perfectionism, Educational Status, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review