Cited by 104Behavioral and Psychological StudiesEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Brief teacher training improves student behavior and student–teacher relationships in middle school.

Open access
Duong, Mylien T., Pullmann, Michael D., Buntain-Ricklefs, Joanne, Lee, Kristine, Benjamin, Katherine S., Nguyen, Lillian, Cook, Clayton R.·2019·School Psychology

Abstract

Despite research demonstrating the importance of student-teacher relationships for student functioning, little is known about strategies to enhance such relationships, particularly in secondary school. The current study examined effects of a professional development for middle school teachers on the Establish-Maintain-Restore (EMR) approach. EMR aims to enhance teachers' skills in cultivating relationships with students and involves brief training (3 hr) and ongoing implementation supports. In a randomized controlled trial, 20 teachers and 190 students were assigned to EMR or control. Observers rated academically engaged time and disruptive behavior, and teachers reported on relationship quality. Multilevel models showed that EMR resulted in significant improvements in student-teacher relationships (Hedge's g = .61, 95% CI [0.21, 1.02]), academically engaged time ( g = .81, 95% CI [0.01, 1.63]), and disruptive behavior ( g = 1.07, 95% CI [0.01, 2.16]). Results indicate potential promise for EMR. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/spq0000296

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. R. Cook et al. (2018) and Duong et al. (2019) found that training for a cohort of willing teachers improved teacher-student relationships, reduced student misbehavior, and improved student attention in class.

    “Via sophisticated, randomized controlled trials, C. R. Cook et al. (2018) and Duong et al. (2019) find that training for a cohort of willing teachers not only improved teacher-student relationships, but also reduced student misbehavior and improved student attention in class.”

    From Fostering Belonging, Transforming Schools: The Impact of Restorative Practices (2023) · cites this paper as Duong et al. (2019)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duong, M. T., Pullmann, M. D., Buntain-Ricklefs, J., Lee, K., Benjamin, K. S., Nguyen, L., & Cook, C. R.
Venue
School Psychology
Published
2019-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
212-221
ISSN
  • 2578-4218 (ISSN-L)
  • 2578-4226
OpenAlex
W2903291650
Cited by
104
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • School Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institute of Education Sciences (R305A170458)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
student behavior, teacher-student relationship, junior high school students, classroom management, teacher professional development
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Teacher Training, School Teachers, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Professional Competence, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review