Cited by 112Educational Environments and Student OutcomesBehavioral and Psychological StudiesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Cultivating Positive Teacher–Student Relationships: Preliminary Evaluation of the Establish–Maintain–Restore (EMR) Method

Cook, Clayton R., Coco, Susanna, Zhang, Yanchen, Fiat, Aria E., Duong, Mylien T., Renshaw, Tyler L., Long, Anna C., Frank, Sophia·2018·School Psychology Review

Abstract

Strong teacher–student relationships have long been considered a foundational aspect of a positive school experience. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of the establish–maintain–restore (EMR) method for improving teacher–student relationships and students’ classroom behavior while providing elementary teachers with structured professional development and follow-up support. A matched randomized design with a sample of fourth- and fifth-grade teachers and students was used to investigate whether the EMR method produced significant improvements in teacher–student relationships and student outcomes using hierarchical linear modeling to account for nesting at the classroom level. Results indicated that the EMR method was associated with significant improvements in teacher-reported teacher–student relationships as well as improvements in observed indices of students’ classroom behavior (academic engaged time and disruptive behavior). Findings also revealed that teacher-reported changes in teacher–student relationships were significantly associated with moderate changes in student classroom behavior. The implications of this study for school-based universal prevention and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17105/spr-2017-0025.v47-3

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. R. Cook et al. (2018) and Duong et al. (2019) found that training for a cohort of willing teachers improved teacher-student relationships, reduced student misbehavior, and improved student attention in class.

    “Via sophisticated, randomized controlled trials, C. R. Cook et al. (2018) and Duong et al. (2019) find that training for a cohort of willing teachers not only improved teacher-student relationships, but also reduced student misbehavior and improved student attention in class.”

    From Fostering Belonging, Transforming Schools: The Impact of Restorative Practices (2023) · cites this paper as C. R. Cook et al. (2018)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, C. R., Coco, S., Zhang, Y., Fiat, A. E., Duong, M. T., Renshaw, T. L., Long, A. C., & Frank, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Evidence-Based Treatment Centers of Seattle
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Clayton R.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
226-243
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
OpenAlex
W2900081464
Cited by
112
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
21.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
teacher-student relationship, classroom behavior, primary school teachers, teacher professional development, follow-up support, academic engagement, disruptive behavior, universal prevention, school-based prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review