Cited by 5COVID-19 and Mental HealthFamily Support in IllnessSocial impacts of COVID-19

COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales

Kazak, Anne E., Alderfer, Melissa, Enlow, Paul T., Lewis, Amanda M., Vega, Gabriela, Barakat, Lamia, Kassam-Adams, Nancy, Pai, Ahna +7 more·2021·PsycTESTS Dataset

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/t81511-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interview guide was informed by validated instruments: COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Survey, Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Scale, Food Security Module, and Everyday Discrimination Scale.

    “Interview questions were informed by the COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Survey [19], Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Scale [20], Food Security Module from the US Department of Agriculture [21], and Everyday Discrimination Scale [22].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazak, A. E., Alderfer, M., Enlow, P. T., Lewis, A. M., Vega, G., Barakat, L., Kassam-Adams, N., Pai, A., Canter, K. S., Hildenbrand, A. K., McDonnell, G. A., Price, J., Schultz, C., Sood, E., & Phan, T.-L.
Venue
PsycTESTS Dataset
Published
2021
OpenAlex
W3201194994
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Social impacts of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 exposure, family impact, psychological impact of pandemic, family functioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review