Cited by 47Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and PerformanceStress and Burnout Research

Organizational belongingness mediates the relationship between sources of stress and posttrauma outcomes in firefighters

Armstrong, Deanne, Shakespeare-Finch, Jane, Shochet, Ian·2016·Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

Abstract

RATIONALE: Previous research with emergency service workers has examined the relationship between operational and organizational stress and negative indicators of mental health, and generally found that organizational stress is more strongly related to pathology than operational stress. METHOD: The current study aimed to create and test a model predicting both posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and posttraumatic growth (PTG) simultaneously in a sample of firefighters (N = 250). RESULTS: The results found that the model demonstrated good fit for the data. In contrast to previous research operational stress was directly related to PTSD symptoms, whereas organizational stress was not. Organizational stress was indirectly related to PTG, through the mediating role of organizational belongingness. CONCLUSION: This research identified organizational belongingness as a good target for psychosocial interventions aimed at promoting positive adaptation following the experience of trauma in emergency services. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0000083

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has supported the use of the operational and organizational constructs in a wide variety of PSP occupations, including police, firefighters, paramedics, and corrections.

    “Previous research has supported the use of the operational and organizational constructs in a wide variety of PSP occupations, including police [13,28,29], firefighters [30], paramedics [31], and corrections [32].”
  • The PSQ-Org and PSQ-Op items are not specific to policing and can apply to other PSP professionals; the scales have been used successfully with a wide range of PSP.

    “Despite the scale titles, none of the items are specific to policing, such that each item can apply to other PSP professionals; indeed, the scales have been used successfully with a wide range of PSP [28,29,30,31,32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, D., Shakespeare-Finch, J., & Shochet, I.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
Published
2016
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
343-347
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2342799410
Cited by
47
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
firefighters, operational stress, organizational stress, post-traumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic growth, mediating effect, emergency workers, occupational injuries, psychosocial interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Humans, Male, Occupational Diseases, Personnel Loyalty, Social Identification, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Firefighters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review