Cited by 47Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsChild Abuse and Trauma

Trauma-focused cognitive–behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) for interpersonal trauma in transitional-aged youth

Peters, Wilma, Rice, Simon, Cohen, Judith, Murray, Laura, Schley, Carsten, Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario, Bendall, Sarah·2021·Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following interpersonal trauma in transitional-aged youth (TAY), aged 15 to 25, is highly prevalent; however, evidence-based interventions have rarely been studied. METHOD: A single-group pre-/posttest study was conducted at headspace Sunshine, Melbourne, Australia, evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, safety, tolerability, and potential clinical effectiveness of trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT). RESULTS: An intent-to-treat analysis was conducted for N = 20 participants (65% female, n = 13) who attended a mean of 15 TF-CBT sessions over 25 weeks. At the end of treatment, only 1 of the 16 participants with a baseline PTSD diagnosis still met diagnostic criteria. Significant improvements were also noted for self-report measures of PTSD (d = -.83), anxiety (d = -.74), and depression (d = -.76). A minority of participants reported a brief exacerbation in symptoms of PTSD (n = 8) and anxiety and depression (n = 5) during stabilization and directly before and/or after the trauma-narration phase. However, all symptoms resolved at the end of treatment. The majority of participants (85%, n = 17) rated the intervention as helpful. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the expected temporary symptom exacerbation, the results indicated that TF-CBT was safe, tolerable, and acceptable. Transitional-aged youth is an emerging area of research. With limited research available on this age group to inform evidence-based practice, it is recommended that a randomized controlled trial is conducted to determine if TF-CBT (Cohen et al., 2017) can be effectively translated to this underresearched age group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0001016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, W., Rice, S., Cohen, J., Murray, L., Schley, C., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., & Bendall, S.
Affiliations
  • Orygen (AU)
  • Allegheny General Hospital (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
Published
2021-03
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
313-321
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W3134850890
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, interpersonal trauma, transitional-aged youth, adolescents and young adults, treatment feasibility, symptom exacerbation, anxiety, depression, trauma narration
MeSH terms
Emotional Abuse, Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review