Cited by 60Stress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

A components-based practice and supervision model for reducing compassion fatigue by affecting clinician experience.

Miller, Brian, Sprang, Ginny·2017·Traumatology

Abstract

Published approaches to compassion fatigue in psychotherapists typically emphasize clinician self-care strategies. Implicit in the self-care emphasis is the assumption that trauma therapy encounters are inherently fatiguing, and that recovery occurs during the clinician’s off-duty time. In contrast,

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/trm0000058

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Miller and Sprang (2016) suggest that fatigue is a result of avoiding intense feelings that come up for the counselor as a result of working with traumatized clients.

    “They suggest that fatigue is a result of avoiding intense feelings that come up for the counselor as a result of working with traumatized clients, and encourage counselors to acknowledge and fully allow themselves to experience the feelings that come up during their work.”

    From Counselor Self-care and Mindfulness (2017) · cites this paper as Miller and Sprang 2016

  • Miller and Sprang (2016) assert that working with traumatized clients does not have to be inherently draining, and that recovering from emotionally exhausting encounters with clients does not have to happen outside of the counselling experience.

    “Miller and Sprang (2016) assert that working with traumatized clients does not have to be inherently draining, and that recovering from emotionally exhausting encounters with clients does not have to happen outside of the counselling experience.”

    From Counselor Self-care and Mindfulness (2017) · cites this paper as Miller and Sprang 2016

  • There have been notable exceptions to the theory that counselor self-care is best practice for avoiding burnout.

    “There have been notable exceptions to the theory that counselor self-care is best practice for avoiding burnout.”

    From Counselor Self-care and Mindfulness (2017) · cites this paper as Miller and Sprang 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, B., & Sprang, G.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Traumatology
Published
2017-06
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
153-164
ISSN
1085-9373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2726102767
Cited by
60
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Traumatology An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
compassion fatigue, psychotherapists, clinician experience, supervision models, trauma treatment, clinician self-care, occupational burnout

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review