The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Substance use and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A meta-analysis examining substance use as a risk factor for intimate partner violence found that there was a stronger link between substance use and violence perpetration among men than among women (Cafferky et al., 2018).”
From Police-Identified Psychological Distress, Substance Use, and Physical Violence Among Male Intimate Partner Stalkers (2025) · cites this paper as Cafferky et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“History of IPV is commonly comorbid with alcohol use disorder (AUD) (Cafferky et al., 2018; Duke et al., 2018; Leonard & Quigley, 2017; Parrott & Eckhardt, 2018).”
From Negative Urgency, Emotion Regulation, and Intimate Partner Violence Severity in High Risk Couples with Alcohol Use Disorders. (2026) · cites this paper as Cafferky et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Indeed, researchers suggest a cumulative effect, meaning with each additional risk factor (DV, MH, SA) that mothers experience, their young children display increasing behavioral challenges (Cafferky et al., 2018;Whitaker et al., 2006).”
From A survey of mothers' experiences of shared parenting and domestic violence (2023) · cites this paper as Cafferky et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Exposure to physical, sexual, and emotional trauma is also common among women with substance use conditions [10].”
From Mindful moms: acceptability and impact of co-designed and digitally delivered video meditations for pregnant and parenting women with opioid use disorder (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spencer, C. M., & Stith, S. (2018) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838018781101 · Cited by 289
Self-citationAlcohol and the Risk of Injury
Chikritzhs, T. N., & Livingston, M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13082777 · Cited by 204
Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: A meta-analysis
Spencer, C. M., Stith, S., & Cafferky, B. M. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.009 · Cited by 135
Self-citationSpencer, C. M., Stith, S., & Cafferky, B. M. (2020) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838020925776 · Cited by 126
“…specific risk markers including relationship factors (Stith et al., 2008), mental health risk markers (Spencer et al., 2019), psychiatric disorders as risk markers (Oram et al., 2014), substance use risk markers (Cafferky et al., 2018), and family of origin risk markers (Smith-Marek et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationShirley‐Beavan, S., Roig, A., Burke-Shyne, N., Daniels, C., & Csák, R. (2020) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-020-00429-5 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Cafferky, B. M., Mendez, M., Anderson, J. R., & Stith, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Loma Linda University (US)
- Kansas State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychology of Violence
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-131
- ISSN
- 2152-081X (ISSN-L)
- 2152-0828
- OpenAlex
- W2519150694
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 14.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Violence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- substance use, intimate partner violence, alcohol consumption, drug use, domestic violence, relationship violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review