A survey of mothers' experiences of shared parenting and domestic violence
Open accessAbstract
This cross‐sectional survey reports on the experiences and impact of mothers in shared parenting arrangements and their young children ages 0–4 years across three provinces in Canada (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario). The purpose of the study was to explore shared parenting arrangements in the context of domestic violence, and we sought to recruit mothers from a range of experiences regarding reported violence in their relationships with their ex‐partners. The online survey consisted of standardized tools to measure child development, depression, substance use, and anxiety, extent and severity of domestic violence, and coparenting. Recruiting during the pandemic was challenging, which required various recruitment strategies. The total sample included 84 mothers who completed questionnaires. Findings show that while mothers experienced various forms of domestic violence in shared parenting arrangements, experiences of coercive control were most evident. Implications are identified and discussed in relation to parenting plans, shared parenting and all forms of domestic violence including coercive control.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This cross-sectional Canadian survey of 84 mothers in shared parenting with children aged 0–4 found that every respondent reported at least one domestic violence/coercive control indicator, with coercive control most evident. Child development and maternal mental health/substance use measures did not differ significantly by reported domestic violence in this sample, while co-parenting quality was lower among mothers with higher HITS scores.
Key findings
- All 84 mothers endorsed at least one of seven DV/CC items; 82% endorsed three or more and 32% endorsed all seven. Specific indicators included 50% physically hurt, 97.6% insulted or talked down to, 66.7% threatened with harm, 81% screamed or cursed at, 53.6% stalked, 71.4% excessive texting, and 69% restricted finances.
- Child development: among 39 children aged 0–2, 62% met age-expected milestones, 13% warranted monitoring, and 26% warranted referral; for ages 3–4, 4–14% warranted referral across subscales. No significant ASQ differences were found by any DV/CC variable.
- Maternal mental health: 20% scored in the moderate anxiety range, 13% severe anxiety, and 61% above the depression cutoff; no significant differences in anxiety or depression by DV, and no relationship between substance use and DV, anxiety, or depression.
- Shared parenting/co-parenting: above the HITS cutoff, 76.5% of other parents had 0–40% parenting time versus 23.5% with 41% or more; below the cutoff, the split was 54.5% versus 45.5% (p < .05). Higher HITS scores were associated with lower CoPAFS total and subscale scores; mothers with shared custody scored higher on CoPAFS than those without (mean ranks 50.81 vs. 38.12, p = .023). No child development differences were found by shared parenting time.
Methods
- Cross-sectional online survey in Alberta, Manitoba, and Ontario; mothers in shared parenting arrangements with at least one child aged 0–4 were recruited, and 84 completed questionnaires. Recruitment was originally planned face-to-face at courts and community agencies but shifted during the pandemic to Facebook and community partners.
- Measures included the ASQ-3/ASQ:SE-2 for child development, CESD for depression, BAI for anxiety, HITS plus three added items (stalking, excessive texting, financial restriction) for domestic violence/coercive control, and CoPAFS-27 for co-parenting.
- Analysis used descriptive and bivariate statistics in SPSS, including independent samples t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests.
Limitations
- Stated: the cross-sectional, non-random sample may not represent all women in similar situations; preliminary results need a larger sample; further research should compare women not reporting domestic violence; children’s outcomes were measured indirectly by mothers rather than direct observation; some free-text demographic responses were uninterpretable; the sample was too small for factor analysis; and HITS is a screening tool despite good predictive validity.
- Evident from the text: because all participants endorsed at least one DV/CC item, the study could not compare a true DV-absent group despite aiming to recruit varied experiences; the self-report and cross-sectional design also limit causal inference.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
9 of 73 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Without a provision to consider domestic violence, the friendly parent provision worked against survivors of violence attempting to protect themselves and their children.
“Without a provision to consider domestic violence, the provision that requires courts to consider the level of support each parent provided the other parent (known as the friendly parent provision) worked against survivors of violence who were attempting to protect themselves and their children from the abuse (Archer-Kuhn, 2016;Jaffe, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Archer-Kuhn, 2016
The Domestic violence section (page unavailable) says the friendly-parent provision can disadvantage abused mothers who restrict contact to protect their children, potentially costing them custody. It does not establish the separate legal claim that there was no provision to consider domestic violence. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Jaffe, 2014 source
- Interpretationcitation
The study's findings on children's developmental outcomes support previous studies that raise similar concerns about developmental outcomes, behaviour regulation and neurological impacts of domestic violence on young children.
“These findings support previous studies (Udo et al., 2016;Easterbrooks et al., 2018) which raise similar concerns about the developmental outcomes, behavior regulation, and neurological impacts of domestic violence behaviors on young children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Udo et al., 2016 source
The Discussion reports an association between maternal intimate partner violence and language and neurological delay in infants and toddlers. The Introduction also discusses behavioral problems in children of abused women, but this study did not assess behavior regulation; its measured outcomes were language and neurological development. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Easterbrooks et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
When mothers scored above HITS cut-off, 76.5% of other parents had 0-40% parenting time and 23.5% had 41%+ (chi-square=4.41, p<0.05).
“This is in contrast to when mothers scored above the cut-off for the HITS, where 76.5% (n = 39) of the other parents had 0%-40% parenting time, and only 23.5% (n = 12) of the other parents had 41% or more (j 2 [1, N = 84] = 4.41, p < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference in child development scores between mothers who reported shared parenting time and those who did not.
“There were, however, no significant differences on child development scores when comparing mothers who reported shared parenting time and those who did not share parenting time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mean HITS score was significantly higher for mothers who reported other parent had 0-40% parenting time (M=12.6, SD=4.3) compared to 41%+ (M=10.5, SD=4.4; t=2.04, p<.05).
“The mean score on the HITS was significantly higher (representing more indicators of DV) for the mothers who reported that the other parent had 0%-40% parenting time (M = 12.6; SD = 4.3), compared to 41% or more parenting time (M = 10.5;SD = 4.4; t[82] = 2.04, p < .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
71.4% reported receiving excessive texts from a former partner.
“A total of 50% of the respondents indicated they had been physically hurt by a partner at least once; 97.6% reported being insulted or talked down to; two-thirds of the respondents have been threatened with harm; 81% reported being screamed or cursed at; more than half of respondents have been stalked by a former partner; 71.4% reported receiving excessive texts from a former partner; and more”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
The added indicator of physical violence reveals higher total DV scores than situations without physical violence.
“The added indicator of physical violence seems to reveal higher total DV scores than situations where physical violence was not an indicator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
When the Hurt item was dichotomized as yes/no, its relationship with the CoPAFS was statistically significant in the same direction (U = 581.00, p = 0.007).
“When the 'Hurt' item was dichotomized as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No relationship between substance use and domestic violence, anxiety, or depression total scores.
“Using the Mann Whitney U test to analyze the current sample, there was no relationship between substance use (when dichotomized as never/7+ days in the past year) and domestic violence, anxiety, or depression total scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mothers who reported being insulted, threatened, screamed at, stalked, excessively texted, or having finances restricted had significantly higher DV total scores than those who did not.
“The same is true for being insulted (t[2.597]= À8.9, p < 0.01), threatened (t[82] = À8.0,p < 0.001), screamed at (t[50.158] = À11.8,p < 0.001), stalked (t[82] = À8.6,p < 0.001), excessively texted (t[59.860]= À8.1, p < 0.001), and having finances restricted (t[82] = À7.1, p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
Two-thirds (66.7%) were threatened with harm.
“A total of 50% of the respondents indicated they had been physically hurt by a partner at least once; 97.6% reported being insulted or talked down to; two-thirds of the respondents have been threatened with harm; 81% reported being screamed or cursed at; more than half of respondents have been stalked by a former partner; 71.4% reported receiving excessive texts from a former partner; and more”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
The null finding for ASQ scores holds regardless of how frequency was dichotomized.
“The same finding is true regardless of how the frequency was dichotomized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE-2) is a valid measure of child development for this population.
- Findingown data
No differences on anxiety or depression scores for the remaining six DV/CC descriptors.
“The same is true for the remaining six domestic violence/coercive control descriptors (insulted, threatened, screamed at, stalked, texted excessively, and access to finances restricted).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
81% reported being screamed or cursed at.
“A total of 50% of the respondents indicated they had been physically hurt by a partner at least once; 97.6% reported being insulted or talked down to; two-thirds of the respondents have been threatened with harm; 81% reported being screamed or cursed at; more than half of respondents have been stalked by a former partner; 71.4% reported receiving excessive texts from a former partner; and more”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
All participants (100%) experienced at least one or two indicators of domestic violence.
“100% experienced at least one or two indicators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
50% of respondents indicated they had been physically hurt by a partner at least once.
“A total of 50% of the respondents indicated they had been physically hurt by a partner at least once; 97.6% reported being insulted or talked down to; two-thirds of the respondents have been threatened with harm; 81% reported being screamed or cursed at; more than half of respondents have been stalked by a former partner; 71.4% reported receiving excessive texts from a former partner; and more”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
No significant differences were found in ASQ total scores for any of the seven DV/CC variables.
“Using independent samples t-test, no significant differences were noted in ASQ total scores for any of the seven domestic violence/coercive control variables (dichotomized as Yes/No).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE-2) is a valid measure of child development for this population.
- Findingown data
The majority of participants experienced three or more indicators of coercive control.
“the majority experienced three or more indicators of CC”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All 84 participants endorsed at least one of the seven DV/CC survey items.
“Based on the completion of the HITS and additional three questions that captured various forms of domestic violence (hurt, insult, threat, scream, stalk, excessive text, restrict finances), all 84 participants (100%) endorsed at least one of the seven domestic violence/coercive control (DV/CC) survey items, with many endorsing several of the DV/CC survey items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
97.6% reported being insulted or talked down to.
“A total of 50% of the respondents indicated they had been physically hurt by a partner at least once; 97.6% reported being insulted or talked down to; two-thirds of the respondents have been threatened with harm; 81% reported being screamed or cursed at; more than half of respondents have been stalked by a former partner; 71.4% reported receiving excessive texts from a former partner; and more”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
Mothers who reported shared custody (n = 29) scored significantly higher on the CoPAFS than mothers who did not share custody (n = 55), with mean ranks of 50.81 versus 38.12 (U = 1038.50, p = 0.023).
“Mothers who reported having shared custody (n = 29) scored significantly higher on the CoPAFS (mean rank = 50.81)than mothers who did not share custody (n = 55; mean rank = 38.12;U = 1038.50,p = 0.023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Half of the mothers in the study reported experiencing physical violence.
“Although half of the mothers reported experiencing physical violence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mothers who scored below the HITS cut-off (less experience of domestic violence) scored significantly higher on the CoPAFS than mothers who scored above the cut-off, with mean ranks of 55.09 versus 34.35 (U = 426.00, p < 0.001).
“Using the Mann Whitney U test, we found that mothers who scored below the cut-off on the HITS (i.e., less experience of DV; mean rank = 55.09)scored significantly higher on the CoPAFS (see Table 7) than mothers who scored above the cut-off (mean rank = 34.35;U = 426.00,p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All participants in the study reported experiencing behaviours indicative of domestic violence.
“Importantly, we have learned from this study that all participants reported experiencing behaviors indicative of domestic violence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant relationships between HITS cut-off and anxiety or depression cut-off scores.
“Additionally, using Crosstabs (Chi-square statistic), there were no significant relationships between the HITS cut-off and anxiety or depression cut-off scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The frequency of mothers' domestic violence experience did not impact child development scores in this sample.
“The frequency with which mothers experienced domestic violence did not have an impact on child development scores in this sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE-2) is a valid measure of child development for this population.
- Findingown data
Two-thirds reported no history of child protection involvement for either party.
“Two-thirds reported no history of child protection involvement for either party.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One-third of participants experienced all seven indicators, that is, both physical violence and coercive control.
“One-third of participants experienced all seven (physical violence and coercive control)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All participants experienced controlling and emotional/psychologically violent behaviours falling within the six indicators the study identified.
“controlling and emotional/psychologically violent behaviors that fall within the six indicators that we have identified.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“in our sample, all mothers who experienced domestic violence in shared parenting arrangements experienced a variety of forms of violence and not limited to physical violence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
The percentage of mothers reporting DV/CC indicators was higher for those with other parent having 0-40% parenting time compared to 40%+ for all indicators except stalking.
“The percentage of mothers who reported experiencing the DV/CC indicators was higher for those who indicated the other parent had 0%-40% parenting time compared to 40% or more parenting time; this was true for all DV/CC indicators except stalking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An indicator of physical harm is correlated with higher scores of coercive controlling behaviors for both the 7 indicators and the 4 indicators of DV/CC.
“An indicator of physical harm seems to be correlated with the higher scores of coercive controlling behaviors for both the 7 indicators and for the 4 indicators of DV/CC (see Table 4) for indicator frequencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
- Findingown data
There was little difference in the experiences of coercive control between women whose children spent less than 40% of their time with each parent and those whose children spent more than 40% of their time with each parent.
“Our findings show that there is not a lot of difference between the experiences of coercive control for women who have parenting arrangements where children spend less than 40% of their time with each parent compared to those where children spend more than 40% of their time with each parent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study's findings provide no evidence that children's developmental concern and mothers' reports of domestic violence are associated.
“however, we do not have evidence (from the findings) to suggest that these two variables are associated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A further 13% of the children aged 0-2 in the study required developmental monitoring.
“another 13% required developmental monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
26% of the children aged 0-2 in the study were reported by their mothers to be showing signs of not meeting developmental milestones.
“a number of children (26%), ages 0-2 in this study, were reported by their mothers to be showing signs of not meeting developmental milestones”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There is a higher risk of the co-occurrence of domestic violence and child maltreatment.
“Further, although we do not intend to suggest that men who have been violent with their partner cannot provide care to their children, we do know that there is a higher risk of the co-occurrence of domestic violence and child maltreatment (Chan et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chan et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In the majority of cases in the Department of Justice Canada review, children were in the primary residency of one parent and had contact with the other.
“In the majority of the cases, the children were in the primary residency of one of the parents and had contact with the other parent (Bala, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bala, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Disclosing coercive control has been subject to a lawsuit or professional misconduct.
“Disclosing coercive control until now has been subject to a lawsuit or professional misconduct (Sowter, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sowter, 2021 source
- Premisecitation
The friendly parent provision placed mothers at risk of losing primary care if they attempted to address violence.
“This friendly parent provision specifically placed mothers at risk of losing primary care of their children if they also attempted to address the violence (Mosoff et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mosoff et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Previously, differentiating domestic violence in families has not been performed during recruitment across studies.
“Previously, differentiating domestic violence in families has not been performed during the recruitment process across studies (Jevne & Andenaes, 2015;Koch & Pincolini-Ford, 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jevne & Andenaes, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Koch & Pincolini-Ford, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductcitation
A cut-off score of 10.5 on HITS reliably differentiates victims of abuse in a community sample.
“A cut-off score of 10.5 has been shown to reliably differentiate victims of abuse in a community sample (Sherin et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sherin et al., 1998
- Premisecitation
Birnbaum et al. (2016) found that shared parenting is ordered more routinely for young children, in nearly half (48%) of cases for children under five.
“Examining 1000 Ontario court files (2010-2015), Birnbaum et al. (2016), demonstrate that shared parenting is ordered more routinely for young children; in nearly half of the time (48%) for children under the age of five.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Birnbaum et al. (2016)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Mothers in shared parenting arrangements in this sample had not been screened out despite the presence of coercive control.
“Results show that mothers in shared parenting arrangements have not been screened out despite the coercive control (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Leading experts have identified concerns with shared parenting in cases of domestic violence.
“This is noteworthy given leading experts in the field of domestic violence have identified concerns with shared parenting in cases of domestic violence (Jaffe, 2014;Jaffe et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jaffe, 2014 source
- cites Jaffe et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 37
- May combine two claims. 45
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationJaffe et al. (2008) reference Kelly and Johnson (2008) and suggest various forms of domestic violence: abusive-controlling violent relationships, conflict-instigated violence, violent resistance, and separation-instigated violence.
“Jaffe et al. (2008) reference the work of Kelly and Johnson (2008) and suggest that there are various forms of domestic violence: abusive-controlling violent relationships (also known as coercive controlling violence); conflictinstigated violence; violent resistance; and, separation-instigated violence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCoercive control may be exercised to obtain information about the mother's activities or to hurt mothers by restricting contact with their children.
“Coercive control may continue to be exercised by the perpetrator to obtain information about the mother's activities (Callaghan et al., 2015;Holt, 2017) or hurt mothers by restricting contact between mothers and their children (Holt, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Callaghan et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Holt, 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncreased externalized behaviors are noted when young children (2-4 years) are exposed to domestic violence.
“Increased externalized behaviors are also noted when young children (2-4 years) are exposed to domestic violence (Manning et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Manning et al., 2014 source
The Results (Maternal Sensitivity as a Moderator of Links Between IPV and Child Adjustment; page not provided) report increased externalizing behavior with greater interparental violence, but only when maternal sensitivity was low. The Method (Participants; page not provided) describes toddlers with a mean initial age of 26 months, followed over two years. The claim omits the protective role of maternal sensitivity and presents the association as applying generally to exposed young children. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFace-to-face recruitment is considered critical for effective recruitment of mothers who have experienced domestic violence.
“Face-to-face recruitment has long been considered critical in developing effective recruitment strategies for mothers who have experienced domestic violence (Bender, 2017;Dichter et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bender, 2017 source
- cites Dichter et al., 2019 source
The Strategy II section describes face-to-face recruitment in clinic waiting rooms, and the Discussion identifies advantages of direct contact with researchers. But the paper studies women experiencing intimate partner violence, not specifically mothers, and does not call face-to-face contact critical: the Recruitment and Enrollment Results report that 29.0% were recruited in clinic, compared with 63.3% by direct mail. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe CESD has good internal consistency reliability and has been used with survivors of domestic violence, with Cronbach's α > 0.90 in community samples.
“The CESD, a 20-item scale to measure symptoms of depression, has been used in depression epidemiology in Community Mental Health Assessment Surveys, has good internal consistency reliability, and has been used to assess levels of depression in cross-cultural studies with survivors of domestic violence (Li & Hicks, 2008) with Cronbach's α > 0.90 in community samples (Koziol-McLain et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Li & Hicks, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Koziol-McLain et al., 2015 source
The Methods/Design > Outcomes passage reports strong psychometric properties, including Cronbach’s α > 0.90 in community samples, for the CESD-R. It distinguishes the CESD-R from the original CESD, so it does not directly establish that reliability figure for the CESD named in the citing sentence. The cross-cultural use claim is attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Sweden, approximately one-third of children 0-5 years in divorced families spend time in shared parenting arrangements, and parents valued these arrangements as a means to continue and strengthen children's relationships with both parents.
“Authors of a recent qualitative study out of Sweden, where approximately one-third of children 0-5 years in divorced families spend their time in shared parenting arrangements, reported that parents valued shared parenting arrangements as a means to continue and strengthen children's relationships with both parents (Fransson et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Fransson et al., 2016 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo quantitative studies in the US reported negative outcomes for children in situations of domestic violence, including short and long-term emotional and developmental outcomes and neurological impacts.
“In the United States, two quantitative studies reported similar negative outcomes for children in situations of domestic violence including short and long-term emotional and developmental outcomes (Udo et al., 2016) and neurological impacts (Easterbrooks et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Udo et al., 2016 source
The Results (Bivariate and Multivariate Analyses; page unavailable) report higher risks of language and neurological delay among infants and toddlers whose mothers experienced moderate or high IPV, supporting the developmental-outcomes portion. The Introduction discusses emotional problems in children of abused women, but this study did not measure emotional outcomes or establish long-term outcomes. The citing sentence assigns neurological impacts to Easterbrooks et al., not to Udo et al. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Easterbrooks et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMothers in shared parenting arrangements experienced various forms of domestic violence, with coercive control being the most evident.
“Findings show that while mothers experienced various forms of domestic violence in shared parenting arrangements, experiences of coercive control were most evident.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe study's total sample comprised 84 mothers who completed the questionnaires.
“The total sample included 84 mothers who completed questionnaires.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe relationship between the HITS and each of the five CoPAFS subscales was statistically significant, with mothers who scored lower on the HITS (less domestic violence) scoring higher on the subscales: Communication (U = 490.50, p = 0.001), Respect (U = 485.00, p = 0.001), Trust (U = 508.50, p = 0.002), Animosity (U = 462.00, p < 0.001) and Valuing the Other Parent (U = 619.00, p = 0.032).
“The relationship between the HITS and each of the CoPAFS subscales was also statistically significant, whereby mothers who scored lower on the HITS (less experience of DV) scored higher on the CoPAFS subscales (Table 3):”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen mothers scored below HITS cut-off, 54.5% of other parents had 0-40% parenting time and 45.5% had 41%+.
“When mothers scored below the cut-off for the HITS (representing fewer indicators of DV), 54.5% (n = 18) of the other parents had 0%-40% parenting time, and 45.5% (n = 15) had 41% or more parenting time; a nearly equal split between groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataWhen the frequency of individual domestic violence items was dichotomized as never/rarely versus more often, six of the seven items were significantly related to the CoPAFS total score, while the Hurt item was not significant.
“Not only was the HITS total score significantly correlated with the CoPAFS, but so too were the individual DV items when the frequency was dichotomized as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data71% of mothers identified as Caucasian/white and 14% as racialized.
“Most of the mothers (71%; n = 60) identified as 400 FAMILY COURT REVIEW Caucasian/white, while 14% (n = 12) identified as racialized (non-white).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMothers who reported ever being physically hurt had significantly higher DV total scores than those who had never been physically hurt (t[82]=-9.8, p<0.001).
“When considering the survey data from all seven DV/CC indicators there were a few mothers who had low DV total scores, meaning a score of 8-10, suggesting only a few incidences of DV/CC behaviors (See Table 3 for DV total score frequencies), whereas, mothers who indicated ever being physically hurt by a partner had significantly higher DV total scores compared to mothers who had never been”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data67% separated, 19% divorced, 9.5% never married/not in relationship.
“The mothers identified as being separated (67%; n = 56) or divorced (19%; n = 16) from the other party, while 9.5% (n = 8) were never married to and were not currently in a relationship with the other party.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf 51 mothers above HITS cut-off, custody arrangements were: 15 sole custody, 12 joint legal with child in mother's care, 11 joint physical, 1 joint legal with child in father's care, 1 split, 11 other.
“Of the 51 mothers who scored above the cut-off on the HITS (more indicators of DV), 15 had sole custody of the child, 12 had joint legal custody with the child in the mother's care, 11 had joint physical custody, 1 had joint legal custody with the child in the father's care, 1 had split custody, and 11 reported another type of arrangement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMore than half (53.6%) were stalked by a former partner.
“A total of 50% of the respondents indicated they had been physically hurt by a partner at least once; 97.6% reported being insulted or talked down to; two-thirds of the respondents have been threatened with harm; 81% reported being screamed or cursed at; more than half of respondents have been stalked by a former partner; 71.4% reported receiving excessive texts from a former partner; and more”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMore than two-thirds (69%) had access to finances restricted by a partner.
“A total of 50% of the respondents indicated they had been physically hurt by a partner at least once; 97.6% reported being insulted or talked down to; two-thirds of the respondents have been threatened with harm; 81% reported being screamed or cursed at; more than half of respondents have been stalked by a former partner; 71.4% reported receiving excessive texts from a former partner; and more”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sample distribution was 44% Ontario, 42% Alberta, and 13% Manitoba.
“A total of 44% (n = 38) of the sample was from Ontario, 42% (n = 35) from Alberta, and 13% (n = 11) from Manitoba.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were 100 children aged 0-4; 49 aged 0-2 and 51 aged 3-4.
“Altogether, there were 100 children aged 0-4; 49 were aged 0-2, and 51 were aged 3-4 (See Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChildren aged 3-4 were meeting milestones in most cases, with only 4-14% warranting referral.
“The children aged 3-4 were assessed by their mothers to be meeting milestones in most cases, with only 4%-14% of children warranting a referral for professional assessment (scored across five subscales and reported in a range).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE-2) is a valid measure of child development for this population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data63% of participants were aged 26-35, 11% 21-25, 14% 36-40, and 11% 41-50.
“Nearly two-thirds of the participants were between the ages of 26 and 35 (63%; n = 53), with the remaining ranging from 21 to 25 (11%; n = 9), 36 to 40 (14%; n = 12), and 41 to 50 (11%; n = 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data84 mothers answered all four sections of the survey.
“Of the mothers who participated in the survey, 84 answered all four sections; demographics, domestic violence and mental health, shared parenting, child development, and having at least one child aged 0-4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMothers who reported ever being physically hurt had a HITS mean total score above the cut-off (M=15.3, SD=2.7), significantly higher than those never physically hurt (M=8.5, SD=2.9; t[82]=-11.2, p<0.001).
“Additionally, the survey data on the four DV/CC indicators from the HITS screening tool (standard cut-off of 10.5) show that the mothers who reported ever being physically hurt by a partner had a HITS mean total score above the cut-off (M = 15.3;SD = 2.7), and this was significantly higher than the mothers who reported never being physically hurt and had a mean total score below the cut-off (M = 8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data88% had some post-secondary education, 70% college diploma or university degree, 58% earning over $40,000, 64% employed full or part-time.
“The majority have some post-secondary education (88%; n = 74), while 70% have a college diploma or university degree, with 58% (n = 49) earning over $40,000 annually, employed full or part-time (64%; n = 54).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf 39 children aged 0-2, 62% were meeting age-expected milestones, 13% may benefit from monitoring, and 26% warranted referral.
“Of the 39 children aged 0-2, mothers of 24 (62%) of the children reported the child was meeting age-expected milestones, as assessed by the ASQ:SE-2, while 5 children (13%) may benefit from monitoring of development, and a further 10 children (26%) warranted a referral for a professional assessment of their development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE-2) is a valid measure of child development for this population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data82% of participants identified three or more of the seven DV/CC items, and 32% experienced all seven.
“For example, 69 (82%) participants identified three or more of the seven items, whereas nearly one-third (32%) of participants experienced all seven items of DV/CC (see Figures 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data38% of the children aged 0-2 were showing signs of developmental concern and their mothers had reported at least one form of domestic violence.
“While we can state that 38% of the children aged 0-2 were showing signs of developmental concern and their mothers had reported at least one form of DV”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCanadian legislation provides both parents the right to participate in their children's upbringing post separation and divorce and supports regular and meaningful contact.
“Currently Canadian legislation provides both parents the right to participate in their children's upbringing post separation and divorce (Divorce Act, 1986) and supports regular and meaningful contact between both parents and the children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Divorce Act, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA mother's mental health is raised as a question of her capacity to care for children, which is a risk factor for children.
“A mother's mental health is raised as a question of her capacity to care for children (Hughes et al., 2015;Qu, 2004); a risk factor for children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hughes et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Qu, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationViolence does not end with separation and may escalate, and there is a lack of outcome studies on differential parenting arrangements in the context of domestic violence.
“Jaffe (2014) reports that violence does not end with separation and may escalate and notes a lack of outcome studies on differential parenting arrangements in the context of domestic violence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaffe (2014) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a context of violence, mothers can be held to a higher standard than fathers in protecting children and can be constructed as unfit parents.
“Within a context of violence, mothers can be held to a higher standard than fathers in protecting their children from the systems that are designed to protect them and can be constructed as an unfit parent, regardless of cultural context (Boyd, 2017;Hughes et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Boyd, 2017 source
- cites Hughes et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe presumption of shared parenting as the ideal parenting plan has become a dominant policy debate underpinning legal judgments and service delivery, with advocacy pressures.
“The presumption of shared parenting as the ideal parenting plan has become a dominant parenting plan policy debate that underpins legal judgments and service delivery, with pressures from advocacy groups to move to a presumption of shared parenting for each case involved in the courts (Bala et al., 2017;Statistics Canada, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bala et al., 2017 source
- cites Statistics Canada, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe intent of coercive control behaviors is to punish and instill fear in the woman.
“The intent of these patterned acts is to punish and instill fear in the woman (Stark, 2007(Stark, , 2009)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Department of Justice Canada court file review found that 75% of parenting plan arrangements included shared decision making by both parents, 20% had mothers as primary decision makers, and 3% had fathers as primary decision makers.
“For example, the Department of Justice Canada court file review found that 75% of parenting plan arrangements included shared decision making by both parents and an additional 20% of 396 FAMILY COURT REVIEW cases where the mothers were the primary decision makers, and 3% wherein fathers were the primary decision makers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe family law system may judge mothers for not protecting children from violence and question their motivation, which can result in loss of parenting time when safety concerns are expressed.
“Additionally, the family law system may judge mothers for not protecting children from violence, and question the mother's motivation to keep their children safe (Boyd, 2017;Hughes et al., 2015) which can result in the loss of parenting time when a mother expresses safety concerns to professionals (Jevne & Andenaes, 2015;Mosoff et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Boyd, 2017 source
- cites Hughes et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Jevne & Andenaes, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDomestic violence is gaining acceptance across many jurisdictions as more than just physical violence.
“Domestic violence, also known as intimate partner violence (IPV), is gaining acceptance across many jurisdictions as more than just physical violence (Elizabeth, 2015), for example, in New Zealand (Elizabeth, 2017), Australia (Douglas, 2018), UK (Barnett, 2015), Hungary (Galátai et al., 2019), Canada (Fotheringham et al., 2013), and in the United States (Gutowski & Goodman, 2020;Walker, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA Department of Justice Canada review of court files from 2010-2012 found that only 21% of files included children sharing at least 40% of their time with both parents.
“While there has been a steady increase in shared parenting plans in recent years, a review of court files between 2010 and 2012 by the Department of Justice Canada found that only 21% of the files included children sharing at least 40% of their time with both parents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Canada, shared parenting plans typically involve at least 40% of the time with both parents and are related to child support guidelines.
“While there remains no consensus about the breakdown of time to define shared parenting, parenting plans typically involve at least 40% of the time with both parents in Canada and are related to child support guidelines (Bala et al., 2017;Bala, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bala et al., 2017 source
- cites Bala, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCustody stalking and paper abuse have been identified as other forms of coercive controlling behavior.
“More recently, 'custody stalking' (Elizabeth, 2017) and 'paper abuse' (Miller & Manzer, 2021) have been identified as other forms of coercive controlling behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHardesty and Ganong (2006) introduced the idea that domestic violence might include physical violence only, physical violence with coercive controlling behaviors, or coercive controlling behaviors alone.
“Earlier research in the United States, Hardesty and Ganong (2006) introduced the idea that domestic violence might include physical violence only, physical violence with coercive controlling behaviors, or coercive controlling behaviors alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hardesty and Ganong (2006) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome studies document general benefits to families in shared parenting arrangements, especially when separated parents get along and focus on children's needs.
“Some of these studies document general benefits to families in shared parenting arrangements (Bauserman, 2002(Bauserman, , 2012;;Trinder, 2010), especially when separated parents can get along with one another and can focus on the needs of the children (Jaffe, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOngoing and cumulative effects of coercive control impact mothers and can result in risk of child neglect in young children.
“It is the ongoing and cumulative effects of coercive control behaviors that impact the mothers (Galátai, et al., 2019) and can result in the risk of child neglect in young children (Nicklas & Mackenzie, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Galátai, et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Nicklas & Mackenzie, 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCoercive control can instill fear without physical violence, continue after relationship ends, and include emotional, psychological, financial, sexual, and spiritual harms.
“Coercive control can instill fear without physical violence and continue after the relationship ends (Crossman et al., 2015), and can include emotional, psychological, financial, sexual abuse, and spiritual harms (Fotheringham et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Crossman et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Fotheringham et al., 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKatz (2015) found that controlling behaviors, isolation, restricting activities and parenting time may impact children's social skills, confidence, and development.
“In the UK, Katz (2015) found that controlling behaviors, isolation from family/friends, restricting activities and parenting time may impact children's social skills, confidence, and development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Katz (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWith each additional risk factor (DV, MH, SA) that mothers experience, their young children display increasing behavioral challenges.
“Indeed, researchers suggest a cumulative effect, meaning with each additional risk factor (DV, MH, SA) that mothers experience, their young children display increasing behavioral challenges (Cafferky et al., 2018;Whitaker et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFemale survivors of domestic violence have three to five times higher rates of developing depression and substance abuse challenges.
“The Canadian Women's Foundation (2011) reported that female survivors of domestic violence have three to five times higher rates of developing depression and substance abuse challenges, and in North America, links have been made between domestic violence (DV), mental health (MH) and substance abuse (SA) (Briere & Jordan, 2004;Dillon et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Canadian Women's Foundation (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAcross jurisdictions, the percentage of time with each parent in shared parenting ranges from 25% to 50%.
“The percentage of time with each parent ranges from 25% to 50% across jurisdictions (Bauserman, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bauserman, 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenHITS has been empirically validated and is the only known tool that measures predictive validity.
“HITS has been empirically validated and is the only known tool that measures predictive validity, which is important as a risk tool for potential future violence in the context of parenting plan arrangements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe BAI has good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.92) and is considered accurate for anxiety in adults over 17, and is recommended for survivors of domestic violence.
“The BAI is a 21-item multiple-choice self-report inventory with good reliability, Cronbach's α = 0.92, and is considered to be an accurate measure of anxiety in adults over the age of 17 (Beck et al., 1988); it is recommended for use with survivors of domestic violence (Satyanarayana & Chandra, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Beck et al., 1988 source
- cites Satyanarayana & Chandra, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChildren under 10 in high-conflict parenting situations were least satisfied with shared parenting, and children under four showed negative impacts such as higher irritability and distressed parent-child interactions.
“Children, under the age of 10 and in high-conflict parenting situations, were least satisfied with shared parenting arrangements while children under the age of four reflected negative impacts from shared parenting arrangements, such as higher irritability and distressed parent-child interactions (McIntosh & Chisholm, 2008;McIntosh et al., 2010;Trinder, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites McIntosh & Chisholm, 2008 source
- cites McIntosh et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Trinder, 2010
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA US report on exposure to domestic violence for children ages one and two noted an impact on behavior regulation.
“Additionally, a report from the USA on exposure to domestic violence for children ages one and two years noted an impact on the effect of behavior regulation (Easterbrooks et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Easterbrooks et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe HITS is a 4-item domestic violence screening tool that assesses both male and female victims and demonstrates good internal consistency and validity.
“To measure the extent and severity of domestic violence, we used the HITS (Hurt-Insult-Threaten-Scream), which is a 4-item domestic violence screening tool that assesses both male and female victims and demonstrates good internal consistency and validity (Sherin et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sherin et al., 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationDifferentiated interventions are required for each type of risk factor.
“This is important because of the differentiated interventions that are required for each type of risk factor (Easterbrooks et al., 2018), and is the reason for our clear distinction during participant recruitment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Easterbrooks et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch on shared parenting has primarily synthesized studies on parental conflict and satisfaction, with a lack of outcome studies on effects of domestic violence on young children.
“Research on shared parenting has primarily been a synthesis of studies examining the level of parental conflict (high/low) on children's and parents' satisfaction with the parenting arrangements (Nielsen, 2013(Nielsen, , 2018) ) with a lack of outcome studies to understand the effects of domestic violence on young children (Jaffe, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study received approval from university ethics review boards.
“We received approval from the university ethics review boards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationChildren's outcomes were measured indirectly through mothers' reports rather than direct observation, which may influence the results given previously reported differences in cross-informant consistency.
“Children's impact was measured indirectly by mothers rather than through direct observation and this may influence these results given the previously reported differences in cross-informant consistency (Romano, Weegar, Babchishin, & Saini, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Romano, Weegar, Babchishin, & Saini, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBill C-78 was enacted in March 2021 and contains specific language including coercive control in the best interests of the child doctrine.
“This is particularly time-sensitive as Bill C-78 was enacted in March 2021 with specific language to include coercive control in the best interests of the child doctrine (Sowter, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sowter, 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe results are preliminary and require further exploration with a larger sample before definitive statements can be made or results generalised.
“Preliminary results require further exploration with a larger sample to make definitive statements and to generalize results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningNot all participants answered every question, and because some survey questions allowed free-text entry some responses were uninterpretable, so some demographic responses do not sum to the total sample.
“Also, not all participants answered every question, and because some questions in the survey allowed for entry of free text, some responses were uninterpretable (e.g.,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe sample was smaller than the authors would have liked, which limited their ability to complete a factor analysis.
“Our sample was smaller than we would have liked and limited our ability to complete a factor analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAlthough the HITS screening tool has good predictive validity, it is a screening tool, which limits its use.
“Finally, although the HITS screening tool has good predictive validity, it should be noted that it is a screening tool.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe CoPAFS scale has been shown to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98).
“The scale has been shown to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98; Saini et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saini et al., 2019 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe HITS was chosen because of its predictive validity for domestic violence.
“We chose the HITS because of the predictive validity of DV”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe results are based on a cross-sectional, non-random sample of women's experiences of domestic violence and shared parenting and may not be representative of all women in similar situations.
“The results are based on a cross-section and non-random sampling of women's experiences of domestic violence and shared parenting and these results may not be representative of all women in similar situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The indicators that determine the success of shared parenting arrangements are little known, particularly for families with children under four, domestic violence, and mental health/addiction concerns.
“This shift to joint legal decisions and shared parenting comes with little knowledge about the indicators that determine the success of shared parenting arrangements, particularly, in families where children are under the age of four and families in which domestic violence is occurring and where concerns of mental health and addictions can also be present.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is known about domestic violence, high conflict, and families with children ages four and under in shared parenting arrangements.
“Researchers across developed countries report on shared parenting arrangements but little is known about the following three areas: domestic violence, high conflict, and families with children ages four and under.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing study designs and methodologies fail to account for different family formations, demographic factors, the presence of domestic violence, and the co-occurrence of addictions and mental health challenges.
“While some research has brought attention to the challenges of shared parenting for young children, these study designs and methodologies fail to account for different family formations, demographic factors, the presence of domestic violence, and the co-occurrence of addictions and mental health challenges.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The three additional non-standardized items (stalking, excessive texting, restricting access to finances) adequately capture coercive control.
“We added three additional (non-standardized) items including stalking, excessive texting, and restricting access to finances, also rated on”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE-2) is a valid measure of child development for this population.
“Child development was measured using the Ages & Stages”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a lack of studies that separate out domestic violence in shared parenting arrangements.
“Given the lack of studies separating out domestic violence in shared parenting arrangements, this research provides some direction for further study.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The number of family court orders for shared parenting in Canada is increasing.
“combined with the increasing number of orders made in family court in Canada for shared parenting.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Two different counts are given for children aged 0-2
MinorThe findings first report 49 children aged 0-2, but the developmental-results section describes 39 children in that age group. The text does not identify the latter as a subset.
“Of the 39 children aged 0-2, mothers of 24 (62%) of the children reported the child was meeting age-expected milestones”
“Altogether, there were 100 children aged 0-4; 49 were aged 0-2, and 51 were aged 3-4 (See Table 1).”
The example compares the same exposure group with itself
MinorThe example says children whose mothers were never physically hurt were compared with children whose mothers were never physically hurt. That conflicts with the preceding description of a Yes/No comparison for this variable.
“For example, the mean ASQ scores of children of mothers who indicated they had never been physically hurt, compared to mean ASQ scores of children of mothers who indicated never being physically hurt were not significantly different.”
“Using independent samples t-test, no significant differences were noted in ASQ total scores for any of the seven domestic violence/coercive control variables (dichotomized as Yes/No).”
Stated CoPAFS maximum exceeds its item-based maximum
MinorA 27-item scale with each item rated on a five-point scale can total at most 135, not 228.
Reported 228 · recomputed 135
“Co-Parenting Across Family Structures (CoPAFS-27; Saini et al., 2019) scale.The CoPAFS assesses five core dimensions of co-parenting: respect, trust, communication, animosity, and valuing the other parent.Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with a possible total score ranging from 29 to 228”
Cites
An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.893 · Cited by 14,407 · see citing works
Coercive Control: The Entrapment Of Women In Personal Life
Stark, E. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195154276.001.0001 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works
Mental and Physical Health and Intimate Partner Violence against Women: A Review of the Literature
Dillon, G., Hussain, R., Loxton, D., & Rahman, S. (2013) · International Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.1155/2013/313909 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x · Cited by 801 · see citing works
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Substance use and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review.
Cafferky, B. M., Mendez, M., Anderson, J. R., & Stith, S. M. (2018) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/vio0000074 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Briere, J., & Jordan, C. E. (2004) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260504269682 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review.
Bauserman, R. (2002) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.91 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Beyond “Witnessing”: Children’s Experiences of Coercive Control in Domestic Violence and Abuse
Callaghan, J. E. M., Alexander, J. H., Sixsmith, J., & Fellin, L. C. (2018) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260515618946 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Jaffe, P. G., Johnston, J. R., Crooks, C. V., & Bala, N. (2008) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00216.x · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Katz, E. (2016) · Child Abuse Review · doi:10.1002/car.2422 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition
Squires, J., & Bricker, D. D. (2009) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t11523-000 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Legal systems abuse and coercive control
Douglas, H. (2018) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1748895817728380 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Whitaker, R. C., Orzol, S. M., & Kahn, R. S. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.551 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
How women make custody decisions and manage co-parenting with abusive former husbands
Hardesty, J. L., & Ganong, L. H. (2006) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407506065983 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Crossman, K. A., Hardesty, J. L., & Raffaelli, M. (2016) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801215604744 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Li, Z., & Hicks, M. H.-R. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.007 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Chan, K. L., Chen, Q., & Chen, M. (2019) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838019841601 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Bauserman, R. (2012) · Journal of Divorce & Remarriage · doi:10.1080/10502556.2012.682901 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Custody Stalking: A Mechanism of Coercively Controlling Mothers Following Separation
Elizabeth, V. (2017) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-017-9349-9 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Cautionary notes on the shared care of children in conflicted parental separation
McIntosh, J., & Chisholm, R. (2008) · Journal of Family Studies · doi:10.5172/jfs.327.14.1.37 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Ethics, Methods, and Measures in Intimate Partner Violence Research: The Current State of the Field
Bender, A. K. (2017) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801216658977 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Manning, L. G., Davies, P. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12279 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Nielsen, L. (2018) · Journal of Divorce & Remarriage · doi:10.1080/10502556.2018.1454204 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Domestic Violence and the Paradox of Post-Separation Mothering
Holt, S. (2017) · British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw162 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Rethinking Custody Evaluation in Cases Involving Domestic Violence
Stark, E. (2009) · Journal of Child Custody · doi:10.1080/15379410903084707 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Romano, E., Weegar, K., Babchishin, L. K., et al. (2016) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/vio0000086 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationKoziol-McLain, J., Vandal, A. C., Nada-Raja, S., Wilson, D., Glass, N. E., Eden, K. B., McLean, C., Dobbs, T., & Case, J. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1395-0 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Mothers’ Narratives of Their Involvement With Child Welfare Services
Hughes, J., Chau, S., & Vokrri, L. (2016) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/0886109915574579 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationMiller, S. L., & Manzer, J. L. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260518791599 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Udo, I. E., Sharps, P., Bronner, Y., & Hossain, M. B. (2016) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-016-1940-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Nicklas, E., & Mackenzie, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-012-9491-8 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Galántai, J., Ligeti, A. S., & Wirth, J. (2019) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-019-00066-y · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Archer‐Kuhn, B., Beltrano, N. R., Hughes, J., Saini, M., & Tam, D. M. Y. (2021) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1941647 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationEasterbrooks, M. A., Katz, R. C., Kotake, C., Stelmach, N. P., & Chaudhuri, J. H. (2015) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260515614562 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Why should they live more with one of us when they are children to us both?
Fransson, E., Sarkadi, A., Hjern, A., & Bergström, M. (2016) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.05.011 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy
Bala, N., Birnbaum, R., Poitras, K., Saini, M., Cyr, F., & LeClair, S. (2017) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/fcre.12301 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationParents in high‐conflict custodial cases: negotiating shared care across households
Jevne, K. S., & Andenæs, A. (2017) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/cfs.12240 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Dichter, M. E., Sorrentino, A. E., Haywood, T. N., Tuepker, A., Newell, S., Cusack, M., & True, G. (2019) · Women's Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2019.03.007 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
(2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Fotheringham, S., Dunbar, J., & Hensley, D. (2013) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-013-9511-3 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A pilot study to assess Coparenting Across Family Structures (CoPAFS)
Saini, M., Pruett, M. K., Alschech, J., & Sushchyk, A. R. (2019) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01370-3 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationA Presumption Against Shared Parenting for Family Court Litigants
Jaffe, P. (2014) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/fcre.12081 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
(2015) · New Zealand sociology · Cited by 19 · see citing works
‘Like Gold Dust These Days’: Domestic Violence Fact-Finding Hearings in Child Contact Cases
Barnett, A. (2015) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-015-9278-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Family Law Reform in (Neoliberal) Context: British Columbia's New Family Law Act
Treloar, R., & Boyd, S. B. (2014) · International Journal of Law Policy and the Family · doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebt017 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Children's Living Arrangements after Parental Separation
Qu, L. (2004) · Family matters · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Should mental health assessments be integral to domestic violence research?
Satyanarayana, V. A., & Chandra, P. S. (2009) · Indian Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.20529/ijme.2009.004 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Nonjudicial Influence on Family Violence Court Cases
Walker, L. E. (2020) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764220956688 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
(2016) · Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationStill Gendered After All This Time: Care and Autonomy in Child Custody Debates 1
Boyd, S. B. (2017) · Ethics, Law and Society · doi:10.4324/9781315094342-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Birnbaum R., 2016, Shared parenting: Ontario case law and social science research, Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 35, 139
- Center for Human Resource Research, 2000, NLS handbook
- 10.1007/s10896-018-00063-1 · DOI
- Koch D., 2006, Parenting coordination in domestic violence cases, Juvenile and Family Justice Today, 15, 16
- McIntosh J., 2010, Parenting Plan Evaluations. Applied Research for the Family Court, 155
- 10.1177/10886260518791599 · DOI
- Mosoff J., 2017, Intersecting challenges: Mothers and child protection law in BC, University of British Columbia law Review, 50, 435
- Nielsen L., 2013, Shared residential custody: Review of the research, Part 1 and 2, American Journal of Family Law, 27, 123
- Squires J., 2015, Ages & Stages Questionnaires®: Social‐Emotional, Second Edition (ASQ®:SE‐2): A Parent‐Completed Child Monitoring System for Social‐Emotional Behaviors
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Countering Arguments Against Parental Alienation as A Form of Family Violence and Child Abuse
Kruk, E., & Harman, J. J. (2024) · American Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/01926187.2024.2396279 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…of family violence when shared parenting arrangements are ordered after divorce, including physical violence as well as coercive control (Meier, 2020) and feminist scholars have found that screening of family violence is often overlooked in family law disputes (Archer-Kuhn et al., 2023).”
Pilinszki, A., Bata, E., Demjén, A., Gervai, J., & Danis, I. (2025) · European Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.5708/ejmh.20.2025.0037 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tutty, L. M., Nixon, K., Ateah, C. A., & Radtke, H. L. (2025) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-025-00857-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Tam, D. M. Y., Archer-Kuhn, B., Beltrano, N. R., Trudgill, D. I. N., & Bozalioglu, T. M. S. (2025) · Race and Justice · doi:10.1177/21533687251356285
Self-citationLux, G., Beltrano, N. R., & Archer-Kuhn, B. (2024) · Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development · doi:10.1080/26904586.2024.2431696 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Archer‐Kuhn, B., Saini, M., Hughes, J., Tam, D., & Trudgill, D. I. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- University of Windsor (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Archer‐Kuhn, Beth
- Venue
- Family Court Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-02
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 395-412
- ISSN
- 1531-2445 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-1617
- OpenAlex
- W4322764587
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Family Court Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
- Keywords
- shared parenting, domestic violence, maternal experience, coercive control, parenting plans, child development, depression, anxiety, substance use, young children, postpartum depression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-29.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-29.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review