Cited by 327Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Mental health factors and intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: A meta-analysis.

Spencer, Chelsea, Mallory, Allen B., Cafferky, Bryan M., Kimmes, Jonathan G., Beck, Austin R., Stith, Sandra M.·2019·Psychology of Violence

Abstract

Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to explore the relationship between mental health disorders and symptoms of mental health disorders (depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD], antisocial personality disorder [PD], and borderline PD) and physical intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration and victimization for males and females. Method: Data from 207 studies, yielding 511 effect sizes, were analyzed. The overall strength of each correlate for IPV perpetration and victimization was examined. Moderator analyses were used to compare the strength of correlates for IPV victimization versus perpetration, as well as for males versus females. Results: Depression, anxiety, PTSD, antisocial PD, and borderline PD were all significant correlates for both IPV victimization and perpetration. Anxiety and PTSD were significantly stronger correlates for victimization than for perpetration, and borderline PD and antisocial PD were significantly stronger correlates for perpetration than for victimization. For women, borderline PD was a significantly stronger correlate for IPV perpetration than for victimization, and PTSD was a significantly stronger correlate for IPV victimization than perpetration. Depression was a significantly stronger correlate for IPV victimization for women than for men. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive examination of mental health disorders and their link to IPV perpetration and victimization. The results suggest that clinicians work…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/vio0000156

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous meta-analyses have revealed small to moderate mean correlations between physical or combined IPV and PTSD, depression, anxiety, suicidality, and drug and alcohol use, with the most robust evidence for PTSD and depression.

    “These previous meta-analyses have revealed small to moderate mean correlations between physical or combined IPV and PTSD, depression, anxiety, suicidality, and drug and alcohol use, with the most robust evidence with PTSD and with depression (Devries et al., 2013; Golding, 1999; Spencer et al. 2019; Stith et al., 2004).”
  • Most meta-analyses to date have not focused on psychological IPV and have either solely focused on physical IPV exposure or combined different types of IPV.

    “Most meta-analyses to date have not focused on psychological IPV and have either solely focused on the mental health implications of physical IPV exposure (e.g., Golding, 1999; Spencer et al., 2019; Stith et al., 2004), or have combined different types of IPV (e.g., Beydoun et al., 2012; Devries et al., 2013; Trevillion et al., 2012).”
  • Spencer et al.'s (2019) large meta-analysis found small to moderate correlations between physical IPV and PTSD (r = .34), as well as depression (r = .25).

    “For instance, Spencer et al.’s (2019) large meta-analysis found small to moderate correlations between physical IPV and PTSD (r = .34), as well as depression (r = .25).”
  • The strength of associations of coercive control with PTSD and depression was comparable to those for physical IPV and combined IPV found in previous meta-analyses.

    “Furthermore, the strength of the associations were comparable to those for physical IPV and combined IPV found in previous meta-analyses.”
  • Research has established an association between depression symptoms and IPV victimization and perpetration, but the temporal relationship remains unclear.

    “While research has established an association between depression symptoms and IPV victimization and perpetration (S. Oram et al., 2014; Spencer et al., 2019; K. Trevillion et al., 2012), the temporal relationship between these two experiences remains unclear.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, C., Mallory, A. B., Cafferky, B. M., Kimmes, J. G., Beck, A. R., & Stith, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • Loma Linda University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Psychology of Violence
Published
2019-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 2152-081X (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-0828
OpenAlex
W2770999921
Cited by
327
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Violence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, perpetration, victimization, mental health, psychological factors, domestic violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review