Cited by 182Sport Psychology and PerformanceTeam Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Believing in “us”: Exploring leaders’ capacity to enhance team confidence and performance by building a sense of shared social identity.

Open access
Fransen, Katrien, Haslam, S. Alexander, Steffens, Niklas K., Vanbeselaere, Norbert, De Cuyper, Bert, Boen, Filip·2015·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Abstract

The present study examined the impact of athlete leaders' perceived confidence on their teammates' confidence and performance. Male basketball players (N = 102) participated in groups of 4. To manipulate leaders' team confidence, the appointed athlete leader of each newly formed basketball team (a confederate) expressed either high or low team confidence. The results revealed an effect of team confidence contagion such that team members had greater team confidence when the leader expressed high (rather than low) confidence in the team's success. Second, the present study sought to explain the mechanisms through which this contagion occurs. In line with the social identity approach to leadership, structural equation modeling demonstrated that this effect was partially mediated by team members' increased team identification. Third, findings indicated that when leaders expressed high team confidence, team members' performance increased during the test, but when leaders expressed low confidence, team members' performance decreased. Athlete leaders thus have the capacity to shape team members' confidence--and hence their performance--in both positive and negative ways. In particular, by showing that they believe in "our team," leaders are able not only to make "us" a psychological reality, but also to transform "us" into an effective operational unit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xap0000033

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such leadership gives people a sense of collective self-efficacy and hope.

    “In part, such leadership gives people a sense of collective self-efficacy and hope 201 .”

    From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [201]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that leaders’ expressed confidence in the team increased members’ process-oriented collective efficacy. The section “Leaders’ Confidence as Means of Enhancing Perceived Effectiveness” mentions hope as something leaders express, but does not say that leadership gives team members hope. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov- Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-33.
  3. Van Dick, R. (2001). Identification and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 265-283.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fransen, K., Haslam, S. A., Steffens, N. K., Vanbeselaere, N., De Cuyper, B., & Boen, F.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Published
2015-03
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
89-100
ISSN
  • 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2192
OpenAlex
W1967659849
Cited by
182
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
24.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
team confidence, shared social identity, team identification, team performance, basketball players, leader confidence, team cohesion
MeSH terms
Psychology, Sports, Adolescent, Basketball, Child, Emotions, Humans, Leadership, Male, Motivation, Self Concept, Social Identification, Athletic Performance, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review