The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why some colors appear more memorable than others: A model combining categories and particulars in color working memory.
Open accessAbstract
Categorization with basic color terms is an intuitive and universal aspect of color perception. Yet research on visual working memory capacity has largely assumed that only continuous estimates within color space are relevant to memory. As a result, the influence of color categories on working memory remains unknown. We propose a dual content model of color representation in which color matches to objects that are either present (perception) or absent (memory) integrate category representations along with estimates of specific values on a continuous scale ("particulars"). We develop and test the model through 4 experiments. In a first experiment pair, participants reproduce a color target, both with and without a delay, using a recently influential estimation paradigm. In a second experiment pair, we use standard methods in color perception to identify boundary and focal colors in the stimulus set. The main results are that responses drawn from working memory are significantly biased away from category boundaries and toward category centers. Importantly, the same pattern of results is present without a memory delay. The proposed dual content model parsimoniously explains these results, and it should replace prevailing single content models in studies of visual working memory. More broadly, the model and the results demonstrate how the main consequence of visual working memory maintenance is the amplification of category related biases and stimulus-specific variability that originate in perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Anderson, D. E., & Awh, E. (2012) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0292-1 · Cited by 32
RetractedBrainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 19,702
A feature-integration theory of attention.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 · Cited by 12,366
Color Science, Concepts and Methods. Quantitative Data and Formulas
Wright, W. D. (1967) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/18/10/010 · Cited by 3,540
Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution
Collier, G. A., Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1973) · Language · doi:10.2307/412128 · Cited by 2,816
Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.
Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.95.1.15 · Cited by 2,257
Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution.
Morrill, W. T., Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1971) · Man · doi:10.2307/2798490 · Cited by 2,173
Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory
Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06860 · Cited by 1,622
Changing concepts of working memory
Ma, W. J., Husain, M., & Bays, P. M. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3655 · Cited by 1,135
Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006 · Cited by 1,102
Cited by
The Distributed Nature of Working Memory
Christophel, T. B., Klink, P. C., Spitzer, B., Roelfsema, P. R., & Haynes, J.-D. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.007 · Cited by 882
Quilty-Dunn, J., Porot, N., & Mandelbaum, E. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002849 · Cited by 205
Visual working memory in aphantasia: Retained accuracy and capacity with a different strategy
Keogh, R., Wicken, M., & Pearson, J. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.07.012 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Bae, G.-Y., Olkkonen, M., Allred, S. R., & Flombaum, J. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 744-763
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2187123262
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 22.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why some colors appear more memorable than others: A model combining categories and particulars in color working memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/xge0000076
- The paper
- Bae, G.-Y., Olkkonen, M., Allred, S. R., & Flombaum, J. I. (2015). Why some colors appear more memorable than others: A model combining categories and particulars in color working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.