Cited by 99Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Social identity and socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting: The effects of group membership.

Coman, Alin, Hirst, William·2015·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

In a conversation, speakers and listeners will often influence each other's memories, and in doing so, promote the formation of a shared, or collective, memory. One means by which a mnemonic consensus emerges is through socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting (SSRIF). When listeners attend to the speakers' selective retrieval of previously encountered events, they forget unmentioned but related information more than they forget unrelated, unmentioned previously studied information. As a consequence, both speaker and listeners come to remember-and forget-the event in a similar way. SSRIF appears to be dependent on listeners concurrently retrieving the information with the speaker. We asked here whether such concurrent retrieval is a function of group membership, thereby underscoring the connection between a basic mnemonic mechanism-retrieval-induced forgetting-and a social function of communicative interaction-building a shared representation. In Experiment 1, Princeton students listening to a speaker selectively recall previously studied material showed SSRIF when the speaker was identified as a fellow Princeton student, but not when he or she was identified as a Yale student. In Experiment 2, activating a common student identity before the listening task triggered concurrent retrieval in Princeton students when listening to both Princeton and Yale speakers. Thus, similar patterns of selective forgetting are more likely to occur between speakers and listeners if they bel…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xge0000077

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social-influence processes in social interactions impact the degree to which people's cognitive representations become aligned.

    “Second, social-influence processes manifested in social interactions impact the degree to which people’s cognitive representations become aligned (Coman & Hirst, 2015).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Coman & Hirst, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coman, A., & Hirst, W.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • The New School (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2015-08
Volume
144
Issue
4
Pages
717-722
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2181504996
Cited by
99
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Princeton University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
retrieval-induced forgetting, group membership, social identity, shared memory, selective forgetting, group identity, conversation, shared representations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Communication, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Recall, Social Identification, Students, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review