Cited by 46Opinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceComplex Network Analysis TechniquesMemory, History, Trauma, Identity

Bridge ties bind collective memories

Open access
Momennejad, Ida, Duker, Ajua, Coman, Alin·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

From families to nations, what binds individuals in social groups is, to a large degree, their shared beliefs, norms, and memories. These emergent outcomes are thought to occur because communication among individuals results in community-wide synchronization. Here, we use experimental manipulations in lab-created networks to investigate how the temporal dynamics of conversations shape the formation of collective memories. We show that when individuals that bridge between clusters (i.e., bridge ties) communicate early on in a series of networked interactions, the network reaches higher mnemonic convergence compared to when individuals first interact within clusters (i.e., cluster ties). This effect, we show, is due to the tradeoffs between initial information diversity and accumulated overlap over time. Our approach provides a framework to analyze and design interventions in social networks that optimize information sharing and diminish the likelihood of information bubbles and polarization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-09452-y

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Communities composed of more interconnected subgroups converge faster on the same information if they interact soon after exposure to a public event, compared with communities of less interconnected subgroups.

    “A burgeoning literature shows that communities composed of more interconnected subgroups converge faster on the same information if they interact soon after exposure to a public event, compared with communities of less interconnected subgroups (Momennejad et al., 2019).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Momennejad et al., 2019

    The Introduction reports prior research finding greater memory convergence in networks whose clusters are more highly connected, and the Results find greater convergence when bridge ties converse first. But this study held network connectivity constant and compared conversation order, not more- versus less-interconnected communities; it measured the degree of convergence, not whether communities converged faster. The public-event example in the Introduction is illustrative rather than the event tested. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Momennejad, I., Duker, A., & Coman, A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Momennejad, Ida
  • Coman, Alin
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-04-05
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1578-1578
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2934602793
Cited by
45
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1748285)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Keywords
collective memory, social networks, information sharing, information bubbles, polarization, information diversity, network synchronization, social learning
MeSH terms
Communication, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Memory, Social Behavior, Information Dissemination, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review