Cited by 317Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEthics in Business and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.

Open access

Everett, Jim A. C., Pizarro, David A., Crockett, M. J.·2016·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

DOI 10.1037/xge0000165

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Moral judgments play a critical role in motivating and enforcing human cooperation, and research on the proximate mechanisms of moral judgments highlights the importance of intuitive, automatic processes in forming such judgments. Intuitive moral judgments often share characteristics with deontological theories in normative ethics, which argue that certain acts (such as killing) are absolutely wrong, regardless of their consequences. Why do moral intuitions typically follow deontological prescriptions, as opposed to those of other ethical theories? Here, we test a functional explanation for this phenomenon by investigating whether agents who express deontological moral judgments are more valued as social partners. Across 5 studies, we show that people who make characteristically deontological judgments are preferred as social partners, perceived as more moral and trustworthy, and are trusted more in economic games. These findings provide empirical support for a partner choice account of moral intuitions whereby typically deontological judgments confer an adaptive function by increasing a person's likelihood of being chosen as a cooperation partner. Therefore, deontological moral intuitions may represent an evolutionarily prescribed prior that was selected for through partner choice mechanisms. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xge0000165

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 · Cited by 37,615
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
11. Reasons and Persons
Parfit, D. (1986) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/019824908x.001.0001 · Cited by 5,803
An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062872 · Cited by 4,561
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant, I., & Korsgaard, C. M. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809590.004 · Cited by 3,775
Passions within reason: the strategic role of the emotions
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-4535 · Cited by 2,971
Morals by Agreement
Gauthier, D. (1987) · doi:10.1093/0198249926.001.0001 · Cited by 1,933
Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05631 · Cited by 1,545

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 315

Cooperation as a signal of time preferences
Lie-Panis, J., & André, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.2266 · Cited by 19
How Much Is Enough? The Relationship Between Prosocial Effort and Moral Character Judgments
Berry, Z., & Lucas, B. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221135954 · Cited by 19
Sensorimotor communication fosters trust and generosity: The role of effort and signal utility
McEllin, L. S., & Michael, J. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105066 · Cited by 20
The Benefits and Costs of a Rose-Colored Hindsight
Kappes, A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.009 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
The effects of individual moral inclinations on group moral conformity
Marton-Alper, I. Z., Sobeh, A., & Shamay‐Tsoory, S. (2022) · Current Research in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100078 · Cited by 19
Justice at the Forefront: Cultivating felt accountability towards Artificial Intelligence among healthcare professionals
Wang, W., Wang, Y., Chen, L., Ma, R., & Zhang, M. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116717 · Cited by 25
Moralization of Rationality Can Stimulate Sharing of Hostile and False News on Social Media, but Intellectual Humility Inhibits it
Marie, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2024) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2024.2363542 · Cited by 22
(Mis)perceiving cooperativeness
Rossetti, C. S. L., Hilbe, C., & Hauser, O. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.020 · Cited by 17
Being good to look good: Self‐reported moral character predicts moral double standards among reputation‐seeking individuals
Dong, M., Kupfer, T. R., Yuan, S., & van Prooijen, J. (2022) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12608 · Cited by 16
The Effects of Social Perception on Moral Judgment
Jin, W. Y., & Peng, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557216 · Cited by 21
Breaking Taboos in Fair Machine Learning: An Experimental Study
Nyarko, J., Goel, S., & Sommers, R. (2021) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3465416.3483291 · Cited by 15
Moral impressions and presumed moral choices: Perceptions of how moral exemplars resolve moral dilemmas
Gawronski, B. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104265 · Cited by 17
Partner in crime: Beneficial cooperation overcomes children’s aversion to antisocial others
Myślińska‐Szarek, K., Bocian, K., Baryła, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2020) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13038 · Cited by 15
Hadza hunter–gatherers with greater exposure to other cultures share more with generous campmates
Smith, K. M., Mabulla, I. A., & Apicella, C. L. (2022) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2022.0157 · Cited by 14
Deontologists are not always trusted over utilitarians: revisiting inferences of trustworthiness from moral judgments
Bostyn, D. H., Chandrashekar, S. P., & Roets, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27943-3 · Cited by 16
People are curious about immoral and morally ambiguous others
Wylie, J., & Gantman, A. P. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30312-9 · Cited by 15
What Is the Right Question for Moral Psychology to Answer? Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018)
Białek, M., Turpin, M. H., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618815171 · Cited by 14
Commitment and impersonation: A reputation-based theory of principled behaviorPreprint
Singh, M., & Hoffman, M. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ua57r · Cited by 24
Helping behavior is non-zero-sum: Helper and recipient autobiographical accounts of help
Ent, M. R., Sjåstad, H., von Hippel, W., & Baumeister, R. F. (2020) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.02.004 · Cited by 14
The role of episodic simulation in motivating commonplace harms
Morris, A., O’Connor, B. B., & Cushman, F. A. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105104 · Cited by 16
Rationalization and Reflection Differentially Modulate Prior Attitudes Toward the Purity Domain
Hannikainen, I. R., & Rosas, A. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12747 · Cited by 12
Are Highly Public Service–Motivated Individuals Immune to Common Causes of Unethical Behavior? Calibrating the Moderating Role of Group Pressure and Competition for Economic Resources
Ripoll, G., Hernández, E., & Ballart, X. (2022) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2022.2127806 · Cited by 12
On the Highway to Hell: Slippery Slope Perceptions in Judgments of Moral Character
Anderson, R. A., Ruisch, B. C., & Pizarro, D. A. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221143022 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Contractualist tendencies and reasoning in moral judgment and decision making
Pargneux, A. L., Nick Chater, A., & Zeitoun, H. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105838 · Cited by 13
Consequentialist Motives for Punishment Signal Trustworthiness
Dhaliwal, N. A., Skarlicki, D. P., Hoegg, J., & Daniels, M. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04664-5 · Cited by 11
Hadza hunter-gatherers are not deontologists and do not prefer deontologists as social partners
Smith, K. M., & Apicella, C. L. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104314 · Cited by 13
Moral conformity in a digital world: Human and nonhuman agents as a source of social pressure for judgments of moral character
Bocian, K., Gonidis, L., & Everett, J. A. C. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298293 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Beyond Trolleyology: The CNI Model of Moral-Dilemma Responses
Gawronski, B., & Ng, N. L. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683241234114 · Cited by 15
Social context during moral decision-making impacts males more than females
Pilcher, J. J., & Smith, P. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397069 · Cited by 18
The utilitarian scientist: The humanization of scientists in moral dilemmas
Sosa, N. E., & Morrison, K. R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103818 · Cited by 12
A pull versus push framework for reputation
Jordan, J. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.06.005 · Cited by 14
The power of justifications to repair human-robot trust, even under moral disagreement
Phillips, E. K., & Malle, B. F. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17983-2 · Cited by 10
A Model of Trust
Bellucci, G. (2022) · Games · doi:10.3390/g13030039 · Cited by 13
Taking the moral high ground: Deontological and absolutist moral dilemma judgments convey self-righteousness
Weiß, A., Burgmer, P., Rom, S. C., & Conway, P. J. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104505 · Cited by 12
To help or punish in the face of unfairness: men and women prefer mutually-beneficial strategies over punishment in a sexual selection context
Ferguson, E., Quigley, E., Powell, G., Stewart, L., Harrison, F., & Tallentire, H. (2019) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.181441 · Cited by 10
Moderators of the Liking Bias in Judgments of Moral Character
Bocian, K., Baryła, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211013272 · Cited by 10
The psychology of partner choicePreprint
Martin, J. W., Young, L., & McAuliffe, K. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/weqhz · Cited by 11
How morality signals, benefits, binds, and teaches
Carnes, N. C., Allmon, B., Alva, J. R., Cousar, K. A., & Varnam, Z. D. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104313 · Cited by 13
Trust in Moral Machines: How automation, morality, and media framing drive cross-cultural adoption of autonomous vehicles
Teychenié, T., Cloarec, J., & Meyer‐Waarden, L. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103428 · Cited by 11
Physical Attractiveness Biases Judgments Pertaining to the Moral Domain of Purity
Klebl, C., Rhee, J. J.-S., Greenaway, K. H., Luo, Y., & Bastian, B. B. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211064452 · Cited by 13
Penitence congruity effect: even murderers are seen as less immoral when expressing guilt and deontological beliefs
Paruzel‐Czachura, M., & Białek, M. (2022) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2022.2077944 · Cited by 9
Severity and deservedness determine signalled trustworthiness in third party punishment
Salcedo, J. C., & Jiménez‐Leal, W. (2023) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12687 · Cited by 9
Having a stake in the future and perceived population density influence intergenerational cooperation
Chang, C., Kristensen, N. P., Nghiem, T. P. L., Tan, C. L. Y., & Carrasco, L. R. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.210206 · Cited by 9
Trustors’ disregard for trustees deciding quickly or slowly in three experiments with time constraints
Cabrales, A., Espín, A. M., Kujal, P., & Rassenti, S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15420-2 · Cited by 9
Children avoid inefficient but fair partners in a cooperative game
Prétôt, L., González, G. T., & McAuliffe, K. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65452-9 · Cited by 9
When is it acceptable to break the rules? Knowledge representation of moral judgements based on empirical data
Awad, E., Levine, S., Loreggia, A., Mattei, N., Rahwan, I., Rossi, F., Talamadupula, K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Max Kleiman-weiner, A. (2024) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-024-09667-4 · Cited by 25
Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas
Bostyn, D. H., keersmaecker, J. D., Assche, J. V., & Roets, A. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01676-9 · Cited by 8
Extortion, intuition, and the dark side of reciprocity
Bernhard, R. M., & Cushman, F. A. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105215 · Cited by 10
The boundary conditions of the liking bias in moral character judgments
Bocian, K., Myślińska‐Szarek, K., Miazek, K., Baryła, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22147-7 · Cited by 9
Humans feel too special for machines to score their morals
Purcell, Z. A., & Bonnefon, J. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad179 · Cited by 10
Moral judgement and decision-making: theoretical predictions and null results
Hertz, U., Jia, F., & Francis, K. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34899-x · Cited by 8
Worrying About Leadership: Is It a Liability or an Advantage for Leadership of Women and Men?
Karakulak, A., Başkurt, A. B., Koseoglu, G., & Aycan, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.675522 · Cited by 7
Earnings Management and the Role of Moral Values in Investing
Brandon, R. G., Sohn, M., Tanner, C., & Wagner, A. F. (2023) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2023.2291408 · Cited by 7
Kant be Compared: People High in Social Comparison Orientation Make Fewer—Not More—Deontological Decisions in Sacrificial Dilemmas
Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620947294 · Cited by 9
Are the folk utilitarian about animals?
Kahane, G., & Caviola, L. (2022) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-022-01833-2 · Cited by 9
Persuasive Messages for Improving Adherence to COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors: Randomized Online Experiment
Mourali, M., Benham, J. L., Lang, R., Fullerton, M. M., Boucher, J.-C., Cornelson, K., Oxoby, R. J., Constantinescu, C., Tang, T., Marshall, D. A., et al. (2022) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/41328 · Cited by 7
The prominence effect in health-care priority setting
Persson, E., Erlandsson, A., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2022) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500009463 · Cited by 7
Research on the influence and mechanism of human–vehicle moral matching on trust in autonomous vehicles
Chen, N., Zu, Y., & Song, J. H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071872 · Cited by 9
Seeking evidence and explanation signals religious and scientific commitments
Gill, M., & Lombrozo, T. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105496 · Cited by 8
Punitive but discerning: Reputation can fuel ambiguously-deserved punishment, but does not erode sensitivity to nuancePreprint
Jordan, J., & Kteily, N. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/97nhj · Cited by 7
Moral decision making in adolescents: The effects of peer attachment, interpersonal affect, and gender
Koenig, S., & Gao, Y. (2022) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12015 · Cited by 9
Navigating uncertainty in human social decision‐making: Consequences and coping strategies
Li, T., Li, S., Li, B., Zhang, Z., Luo, Y., & Feng, C. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12756 · Cited by 8
Synchrony Influences Estimates of Cooperation in a Public-Goods Game
McEllin, L. S., & Sebanz, N. (2024) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976231223410 · Cited by 6
Moral behavior in games: A review and call for additional research
Clarkson, E. M. (2021) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100912 · Cited by 8
Moral paragons, but crummy friends: The case of snitching.
Berry, Z., Silver, I., & Shaw, A. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000501 · Cited by 8
Do People Believe That They Are More Deontological Than Others?
Li, M., & Rao, L. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218823040 · Cited by 11
Ends versus Means: Kantians, Utilitarians, and Moral Decisions
Bénabou, R., Falk, A., & Henkel, L. (2024) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w32073 · Cited by 7
The impact of moral judgment on bystanders’ interpersonal trust: the mediating role of trustworthiness
Zhang, Z., Cai, X., Gao, W., Zhang, Z., & Qi, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440768 · Cited by 6
Lay beliefs in moral expertise
Schmittat, S. M., & Burgmer, P. (2020) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2020.1719053 · Cited by 5
Why are concerned parties legitimized superiorly in NIMBY problems: Effects of the maximin principle and moral foundations on the right to decide on a high-level radioactive waste storage facility
Nonami, H., Sakamoto, G., Ohtomo, S., Tashiro, Y., & Aoki, T. (2021) · THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY · doi:10.2130/jjesp.2103 · Cited by 5
Differences in moral judgment predict behavior in a Covid triage game scenario
Clarkson, E. M., Jasper, J. D., & Gugle, B. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111671 · Cited by 5
The Relative Effectiveness of Positive and Negative Gossip in Promoting Prosocial Giving: The Examination of the Valence of Gossip Content and Reputational Consequences
Imada, H. (2023) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12473 · Cited by 6
Vaccine Nationalism Counterintuitively Erodes Public Trust in Leaders
Colombatto, C., Everett, J. A. C., Senn, J., Maréchal, M. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2023) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976231204699 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
When Your Friend is My Friend: How Loyalty Prompts Support for Indirect Ties in Moral Dilemmas
Berry, Z., & Hildreth, J. A. D. (2024) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.18003 · Cited by 5
Ethics and Security Automata
Welsh, S. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315168951 · Cited by 5
Earnings Management and the Role of Moral Values in InvestingPreprint
Gibson, R., Sohn, M., Tanner, C., & Wagner, A. F. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2912795 · Cited by 5
Carving Stories at their Natural JointsPreprint
Dubourg, E., Thouzeau, V., Beuchot, T., Bonard, C., Boyer, P., Chevallier, C., Clasen, M., Boon-Falleur, M., Fiorio, G., Fitouchi, L., et al. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/me6bz · Cited by 12
Can AI Model the Complexities of Human Moral Decision-making? A Qualitative Study of Kidney Allocation Decisions
Keswani, V., Conitzer, V., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P., Nguyen, B. K., Heidari, H., & Borg, J. S. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714167 · Cited by 8
Costly Displays in a Digital World: Signalling Trustworthiness on Social Media
Reimann, R. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2150990 · Cited by 4
Are rules meant to be broken? When and why consistent rule-following undermines versus enhances trust
White, M., Levine, E. E., & Kristal, A. C. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104552 · Cited by 4
Consequences of agreement versus disagreement on physical disgust: How do people perceive the cleanliness and morality of someone who expresses inappropriate disgust
Katzir, M., Hoffmann, M., & Liberman, N. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2631 · Cited by 4
Most people do not “value the struggle”: Tempted agents are judged as less virtuous than those who were never tempted
McManus, R. M., Fong, H. P., Max Kleiman-weiner, A., & Young, L. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104615 · Cited by 4
Religion as a natural laboratory for understanding human behavior
Moon, J. W. (2024) · Archive for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1177/00846724241255131 · Cited by 8
Moral Metaphysics, Moral Psychology, and the Cognitive Sciences
Railton, P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190639679.003.0004 · Cited by 4
“Bana göre” Ahlak: Sıradan İnsanın Ahlakı Kavramsallaştırması
Cesur, S., Tepe, B., Piyale, Z. E., Sunar, D. G., & Biten, A. F. (2020) · Türk Psikoloji Yazıları · doi:10.31828/tpy1301996120200219m000021 · Cited by 7
Contingencies of self-worth and the strength of deontological and utilitarian inclinations
Macko, A. (2020) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2020.1860882 · Cited by 4
If You Don’t Believe in God, Do You at Least Believe in Aristotle? Evaluations of Religious Outgroup Members Hinge upon Moral Perceptions
Mallinas, S. R., & Conway, P. J. (2021) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2021.1916240 · Cited by 4
The Puzzle of Evaluating Moral Cognition in Artificial Agents
Reinecke, M. G., Mao, Y., Kunesch, M., Duéñez‐Guzmán, E. A., Haas, J., & Leibo, J. Z. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13315 · Cited by 7
Trust and Learning
Bellucci, G., & Dreher, J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.011 · Cited by 4
The Role of Morality in Social Cognition
Ray, J. L., Mende‐Siedlecki, P., Gantman, A. P., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_28 · Cited by 5
The role of episodic simulation in motivating commonplace harmsPreprint
Morris, A., O’Connor, B. B., & Cushman, F. A. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/avrj5 · Cited by 4
Neuroscience of Moral Decision Making
Hu, Y., Gao, X., Yu, H., He, Z., & Zhou, X. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819641-0.00151-1 · Cited by 5
Moral dilemmas and trust in leaders during a global health crisisPreprint
Everett, J. A. C., Colombatto, C., Awad, E., Boggio, P. S., Bos, B., Brady, W. J., Chawla, M., Chituc, V., Chung, D., Drupp, M. A., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mzswb · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Reputational and cooperative benefits of third-party compensationPreprint
Patil, I., Dhaliwal, N. A., & Cushman, F. A. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/c3bsj · Cited by 6
Mapping universal and culturally specific moral brain: An SDM meta-analysis of neural correlates in shame and guilt across East Asian and Western contexts
Chen, T., Qiu, Y., Gan, R., Du, Y., Zhang, Y., Lin, S. T., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106200 · Cited by 4
Moral-dilemma judgments by individuals and groups: Are many heads really more utilitarian than one?
Rokosz, M., Białek, M., Stefańczyk, M., & Gawronski, B. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106053 · Cited by 4
Some moral benefits of ignorance
Licon, J. A. (2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2042230 · Cited by 3
Investing to gain others’ trust: Cognitive abstraction increases prosocial behavior and trust received from others
van Houwelingen, G., & van Dijke, M. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284500 · Cited by 5
Thinking About Reasons for One’s Choices Increases Sensitivity to Moral Norms in Moral-Dilemma Judgments
Ng, N. L., Luke, D. M., & Gawronski, B. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231180760 · Cited by 5
Maximin principle, emotional aversion, and integrative judgment in the NIMBY context, including social dilemma and moral dilemma: The roles of the amygdala, angular gyrus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Nonami, H., Oba, K., Tashiro, Y., Aoki, T., & Ohtomo, S. (2023) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2023.2280060 · Cited by 3

Authors: Everett, J. A. C., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J.
Affiliations: University of Oxford (GB)
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author: Everett, Jim A. C.
ORCID: Everett, Jim A. C.
Pizarro, David A.
Crockett, M. J.
Venue: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 2016
Volume: 145
Issue: 6
Pages: 772-787
ISSN: 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
1939-2222
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000165
OpenAlex: W3121353240
Cited by: 317
References: 49
Citations by year: 2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 8
FWCI: 17.01
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
doi.org
Locations: Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Oxford University Press
Topics: Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords: moral intuitions, trustworthiness, cooperation, moral perception, normative ethics
MeSH terms: Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Morals, Social Desirability, Intuition, Ethical Theory, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks