Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Trichromatic color vision with only two spectrally distinct photopigments

Neitz, J., Neitz, M., He, J. C., Shevell, S. K.·1999·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Protanomaly is a common, X-linked abnormality of color vision. Like people with normal color vision, protanomalous observers are trichromatic, but their ability to discriminate colors in the red-green part of the spectrum is reduced because the photopigments that mediate discrimination in this range are abnormally similar. Whereas normal subjects have pigments whose wavelengths of peak sensitivity differ by about 30 nm, the peak wavelengths for protanomalous observers are thought to differ by only a few nanometers. We found, however, that although this difference occurred in some protanomalous subjects, others had pigments whose peak wavelengths were identical. Genetic and psychophysical results from the latter class indicated that limited red-green discrimination can be achieved with pigments that have the same peak wavelength sensitivity and that differ only in optical density. A single amino acid substitution was correlated with trichromacy in these subjects, suggesting that differences in pigment sequence may regulate the optical density of the cone.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/13185

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Dartnall, H. J., Bowmaker, J. K. & Mollon, J. D. Human visual pigments: microspectrophotometric results from the eye of seven persons. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 220, 115–130 ( 1983). · DOI
  2. Merbs, S. L. & Nathans, J. Absorption spectra of the hybrid pigments responsible for anomalous color vision. Science 258, 464–466 (1992). · DOI
  3. Oprian, D. D., Asenjo, A. B., Lee, N. & Pelletier, S. L. Design, chemical synthesis, and expression of genes for the three human color vision pigments. Biochemistry 30, 11367– 11372 (1991). · DOI
  4. Mollon, J. D. "Tho' she kneel'd in that place where they grew..." The uses and origins of primate colour vision. J. Exp. Biol. 146, 21–38 (1989). · DOI
  5. Nathans, J., Thomas, D. & Hogness, D. S. Molecular genetics of human color vision: The genes encoding blue, green, and red pigments. Science 232 , 193–202 (1986). · DOI
  6. Neitz, J., Neitz, M. & Jacobs, G. H. More than three different cone pigments among people with normal color vision. Vision Res. 33, 117–122 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Winderickx, J. et al. Polymorphism in red photopigment underlies variation in colour matching. Nature 356, 431– 433 (1992). · DOI
  8. Nathans, J., Piantanida, T. P., Eddy, R. L., Shows, T. B. & Hogness, D. S. Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision. Science 232, 203–210 (1986). · DOI
  9. Asenjo, A. B., Rim, J. & Oprian, D. D. Molecular determinants of human red/green color discrimination. Neuron 12, 1131–1138 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ibbotson, R. E., Hunt, D. M., Bowmaker, J. K. & Mollon, J. D. Sequence divergence and copy number of the middle- and long-wave photopigment genes in Old World monkey. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 247, 145–154 (1992). · DOI
  11. Merbs, S. L. & Nathans, J. Role of hydroxyl-bearing amino acids in differentially tuning the absorption spectra of the human red and green cone pigments. Photochem. Photobiol. 58, 706–710 (1993). · DOI
  12. Williams, A. J., Hunt, D. M., Bowmaker, J. K. & Mollon, J. D. The polymorphic photopigments of the marmoset: spectral tuning and genetic basis. EMBO J. 11, 2039– 2045 (1992). · DOI
  13. Neitz, M., Neitz, J. & Jacobs, G. H. Analysis of fusion gene and encoded photopigment of colour-blind humans. Nature 342, 679– 682 (1989). · DOI
  14. Neitz, J., Neitz, M. & Kainz, P. M. Visual pigment gene structure and the severity of human color vision defects. Science 274, 801– 804 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Neitz, M., Neitz, J. & Jacobs, G. H. Genetic basis of photopigment variations in human dichromats. Vision Res. 35, 2095–2103 (1995). · DOI
  16. Neitz, M. & Neitz, J. Numbers and ratios of visual pigment genes for normal red–green color vision. Science 267, 1013–1016 (1995). · DOI
  17. Neitz, M. & Neitz, J. in Color Vision: Perspectives from Different Disciplines (eds. Backhaus, W. G. K., Kliegl, R. & Werner, J. S.) 101–119 (de Gruyter, New York, 1998). · DOI
  18. Shevell, S. K. & He, J. C. in Colour Vision Deficiencies XIII (ed. Cavonius, C. R.) 45–58 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997). · DOI
  19. He, J.C. & Shevell, S. K. Variation in color matching and discrimination among deuteranomalous trichromats: theoretical implications of small differences in photopigments. Vision Res. 35, 2579–2588 (1995). · DOI
  20. Shevell, S. K. & He, J. C. The visual photopigments of simple deuteranomalous trichromats inferred from color matching. Vision Res. 37, 1115–1127 (1997). · DOI
  21. Strutt, J. W. Experiments on colour. Nature 25, 64– 66 (1881). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Neitz, J., Neitz, M., He, J. C., & Shevell, S. K.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
1999-10
Volume
2
Issue
10
Pages
884-888
ISSN
  • 1097-6256
  • 1546-1726
Cited by
64
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review