Cited by 145Erythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentHormonal and reproductive studiesEstrogen and related hormone effects

Mechanism of Testosterone Action in Erythropoiesis

MIRAND, EDWIN A., GORDON, ALBERT S., WENIG, JEFFREY·1965·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/206270a0

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MIRAND, E. A., GORDON, A. S., & WENIG, J.
Affiliations
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1965-04
Volume
206
Issue
4981
Pages
270-272
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2095110446
Cited by
145
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
testosterone, erythropoiesis, erythropoietin, androgen action
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood, Erythropoiesis, Iron, Iron Isotopes, Rabbits, Rodentia, Testosterone, Mice, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review