Cited by 220Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsProtist diversity and phylogenyPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis

Chlorophyll b and phycobilins in the common ancestor of cyanobacteria and chloroplasts

Tomitani, Akiko, Okada, Kiyotaka, Miyashita, Hideaki, Matthijs, Hans C. P., Ohno, Terufumi, Tanaka, Ayumi·1999·Nature

Abstract

Photosynthetic organisms have a variety of accessory pigments, on which their classification has been based. Despite this variation, it is generally accepted that all chloroplasts are derived from a single cyanobacterial ancestor. How the pigment diversity has arisen is the key to revealing their evolutionary history. Prochlorophytes are prokaryotes which perform oxygenic photosynthesis using chlorophyll b, like land plants and green algae (Chlorophyta), and were proposed to be the ancestors of chlorophyte chloroplasts. However, three known prochlorophytes (Prochloron didemni, Prochlorothrix hollandica and Prochlorococcus marinus) have been shown to be not the specific ancestors of chloroplasts, but only diverged members of the cyanobacteria, which contain phycobilins but lack chlorophyll b. Consequently it has been proposed that the ability to synthesize chlorophyll b developed independently several times in prochlorophytes and in the ancestor of chlorophytes. Here we have isolated the chlorophyll b synthesis genes (chlorophyll a oxygenase) from two prochlorophytes and from major groups of chlorophytes. Phylogenetic analyses show that these genes share a common evolutionary origin. This indicates that the progenitors of oxygenic photosynthetic bacteria, including the ancestor of chloroplasts, had both chlorophyll b and phycobilins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/22101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomitani, A., Okada, K., Miyashita, H., Matthijs, H. C. P., Ohno, T., & Tanaka, A.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tomitani, Akiko
Venue
Nature
Published
1999-07
Volume
400
Issue
6740
Pages
159-162
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2172173039
Cited by
220
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Keywords
chlorophyll b, phycobilins, prochlorophytes, chloroplast origin, accessory pigments, oxygenic photosynthesis, Prochlorothrix hollandica, Prochlorococcus marinus, gene evolution, photosynthetic pigments
MeSH terms
Cyanobacteria, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Chlorophyll, Chloroplasts, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxygenases, Phycocyanin, Phylogeny, Pyrroles, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Arabidopsis, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Evolution, Molecular, Prochloron, Prochlorothrix, Tetrapyrroles, Phycobilins, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review