Cited by 744Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationAvian ecology and behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/293293a0

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 744

Metadata

Authors
Lee, D. N., & Reddish, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
Nature
Published
1981-09
Volume
293
Issue
5830
Pages
293-294
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2018048272
Cited by
743
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
gannets, Sula bassana, plunge diving, visual control of movement, ecological optics, seabirds, motion perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review