Cited by 85Advanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

Soft X-ray imaging with a normal incidence mirror

Underwood, James H., Barbee, Troy W.·1981·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/294429a0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Underwood, J. H., & Barbee, T. W.
Affiliations
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1981-12
Volume
294
Issue
5840
Pages
429-431
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2021742853
Cited by
85
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 18 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Keywords
soft X-ray imaging, tungsten/carbon multilayers, concave mirror, X-ray diffraction, X-ray reflectivity, silicon substrate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review