Cited by 430Language and cultural evolutionLinguistics and language evolutionPacific and Southeast Asian Studies

Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion

Open access
Gray, Russell D., Jordan, Fiona M.·2000·Nature

Abstract

Languages, like molecules, document evolutionary history. Darwin observed that evolutionary change in languages greatly resembled the processes of biological evolution: inheritance from a common ancestor and convergent evolution operate in both. Despite many suggestions, few attempts have been made to apply the phylogenetic methods used in biology to linguistic data. Here we report a parsimony analysis of a large language data set. We use this analysis to test competing hypotheses--the "express-train" and the "entangled-bank" models--for the colonization of the Pacific by Austronesian-speaking peoples. The parsimony analysis of a matrix of 77 Austronesian languages with 5,185 lexical items produced a single most-parsimonious tree. The express-train model was converted into an ordered geographical character and mapped onto the language tree. We found that the topology of the language tree was highly compatible with the express-train model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35016575

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Linguistic evidence supports the Express-train hypothesis, according to which Polynesian ancestors moved rapidly from Eastern Asia into the Pacific without significant admixture with Melanesians.

    “Furthermore, linguistic evidence (Gray and Jordan 2000) is usually interpreted to support the ''Express-train'' hypothesis (Diamond 1988), according to which Polynesian ancestors moved rapidly from Eastern Asia into the Pacific without significant admixture with Melanesians”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, R. D., & Jordan, F. M.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Gray, Russell D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2000-06-29
Volume
405
Issue
6790
Pages
1052-1055
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1662043995
Cited by
430
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
307.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Maryland Sea Grant, University of Maryland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Keywords
Austronesian languages, language phylogeny, Austronesian expansion, lexical evolution, language divergence, parsimony analysis
MeSH terms
Archaeology, Asia, Australia, Biological Evolution, Humans, Language, Models, Biological, Pacific Islands, Phylogeny, Polynesia, Population Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review