The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a resolution of the lek paradox
Abstract
Genetic benefits in the shape of 'good genes' have been invoked to explain costly female choice in the absence of direct fitness benefits. Little genetic variance in fitness traits is expected, however, because directional selection tends to drive beneficial alleles to fixation. There seems to be little potential, therefore, for female choice to result in genetic benefits, giving rise to the 'lek paradox'. Nevertheless, evidence shows that genetic variance persists despite directional selection and genetic benefits of female choice are frequently reported. A theoretical solution to the lek paradox has been proposed on the basis of two assumptions: that traits are condition-dependent, and that condition shows high genetic variance. The observed genetic variability in sexual traits will be accounted for, because a proportion of the genetic variance in condition will be captured and expressed in the trait. Here we report results from experiments showing that male courtship rate in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus is a condition-dependent trait that is preferred by females. More importantly, male condition has high genetic variance and is genetically correlated with courtship rate. Our results thereby represent a significant step towards a resolution of the lek paradox.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus far, no studies have addressed how genetic diversity might be maintained over time for BSF in light of the lekking paradox (Kotiaho et al. 2001).”
From Beyond the Black Box: Reproductive Strategies of the Black Soldier Fly as a Model for Bridging Evolutionary Biology and Applied Entomology (2026) · cites this paper as Kotiaho et al. 2001
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Andersson, M. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207278 · Cited by 7,911
Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.
Houle, D. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/130.1.195 · Cited by 1,969
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, J. H., & Falconer, D. S. (1960) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342481 · Cited by 1,812
Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects
(1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-108750-0.x5001-0 · Cited by 1,694
The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.
H., A. B., & Fisher, R. A. (1931) · Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2341823 · Cited by 1,620
The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0207 · Cited by 1,461
The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek
Kirkpatrick, M., & Ryan, M. J. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350033a0 · Cited by 1,315
Evolutionary quantitative genetics
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5054 · Cited by 1,307
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pomiankowski, A. N. The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 5, 136–184 (1988).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolution of mate choice and mating biases
Kokko, H., Brooks, R. C., Jennions, M. D., & Morley, J. I. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2235 · Cited by 957
Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes
Pigliucci, M. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00428.x · Cited by 831
Cotton, S., Fowler, K., & Pomiankowski, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2688 · Cited by 625
On the resolution of the lek paradox
Kotiaho, J. S., LeBas, N. R., Puurtinen, M., & Tomkins, J. L. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.012 · Cited by 619
Self-citationGenic capture and resolving the lek paradox
Tomkins, J. L., Radwan, J., Kotiaho, J. S., & Tregenza, T. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.029 · Cited by 581
Self-citationThe sexual selection continuum
Kokko, H., Brooks, R. C., McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2020 · Cited by 492
High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young
Hunt, J., Brooks, R. C., Jennions, M. D., Smith, M. J., Bentsen, C. L., & Bussière, L. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03084 · Cited by 467
Female Mate Choice as a Condition‐Dependent Life‐History Trait
Hunt, J., Brooks, R. C., & Jennions, M. D. (2005) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/430672 · Cited by 265
Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating
Kvarnemo, C., & Simmons, L. W. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0042 · Cited by 256
Self-citationBlows, M. W., Chenoweth, S. F., & Hine, E. (2004) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/381941 · Cited by 254
Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice
Roberts, S. C., & Gosling, L. M. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1231 · Cited by 244
Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction
Kokko, H., & Brooks, R. C. (2003) · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · Cited by 217
Condition dependence of pheromones and immune function in the grain beetle Tenebrio molitor
Rantala, M. J., Kortet, R., Kotiaho, J. S., Vainikka, A., & Suhonen, J. (2003) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00764.x · Cited by 202
Self-citationSimmons, L. W., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01474.x · Cited by 191
Self-citationDirect selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response
Hall, M. D., Lindholm, A. K., & Brooks, R. C. (2004) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-4-1 · Cited by 187
Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris
Scheuber, H., Jacot, A., & Brinkhof, M. W. G. (2003) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2083 · Cited by 161
Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review
Weissing, F. J., Edelaar, P., & van Doorn, G. S. (2011) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1125-7 · Cited by 160
Russell Bonduriansky, A., & Rowe, L. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00901.x · Cited by 153
Holzer, B. (2003) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/14.3.353 · Cited by 153
Simmons, L. W., & García–González, F. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00479.x · Cited by 152
Self-citationInterspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens
Tynkkynen, K., Rantala, M. J., & Suhonen, J. (2004) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00733.x · Cited by 149
Reproductive skew and selection on female ornamentation in social species
Rubenstein, D. R., & Lovette, I. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08614 · Cited by 145
Petfield, D., Chenoweth, S. F., Rundle, H. D., & Blows, M. W. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409378102 · Cited by 143
Kotiaho, J. S., & Simmons, L. W. (2003) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1910(03)00117-3 · Cited by 141
Self-citationTHE ROLES OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION DURING ADAPTATION TO A NOVEL ENVIRONMENT
Rundle, H. D., Chenoweth, S. F., & Blows, M. W. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01859.x · Cited by 141
Genetic Tools for Studying Adaptation and the Evolution of Behavior
Boake, C. R. B., Arnold, S. J., Breden, F. J., Meffert, L. M., Ritchie, M. G., Taylor, B. J., Wolf, J. B., & Moore, A. J. (2002) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/342902 · Cited by 138
META-ANALYSIS SUGGESTS CHOOSY FEMALES GET SEXY SONS MORE THAN “GOOD GENES”
Prokop, Z. M., Michalczyk, Ł., Drobniak, S. M., Herdegen‐Radwan, M., & Radwan, J. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01654.x · Cited by 129
Pyysiäinen, I. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001 · Cited by 129
Quantitative genetic evidence that males trade attractiveness for ejaculate quality in guppies
Evans, J. P. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0826 · Cited by 127
Recombination and the divergence of hybridizing species.
Ortíz-Barrientos, D., Reiland, J., Hey, J., & Noor, M. A. F. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 127
Modelling for Field Biologists and Other Interesting People
Kokko, H. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811388 · Cited by 126
The Genetics of Speciation by Reinforcement
Ortíz-Barrientos, D., Counterman, B. A., & Noor, M. A. F. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020416 · Cited by 126
Friedl, T. W. P., & Klump, G. M. (2005) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.017 · Cited by 124
Male age, mating status and nuptial gift quality in a bushcricket
Wedell, N., & Ritchie, M. G. (2004) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.007 · Cited by 120
Brooks, R. C. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 115
Hine, E., Chenoweth, S. F., & Blows, M. W. (2004) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01627.x · Cited by 113
GENETIC BENEFITS OF A FEMALE MATING PREFERENCE IN GRAY TREE FROGS ARE CONTEXT-DEPENDENT
Welch, A. M. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00299.x · Cited by 113
Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm
Kotiaho, J. S., & Puurtinen, M. (2007) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01286.x · Cited by 112
Self-citationFemale preference for multiple condition–dependent components of a sexually selected signal
Scheuber, H., Jacot, A., & Brinkhof, M. W. G. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2907 · Cited by 111
Evolutionary Response to Sexual Selection in Male Genital Morphology
Simmons, L. W., House, C. M., Hunt, J., & García–González, F. (2009) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.056 · Cited by 110
Self-citationKotiaho, J. S., Simmons, L. W., Hunt, J., & Tomkins, J. L. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/375173 · Cited by 110
Self-citationThe Depletion of Genetic Variance by Sexual Selection
Homrigh, A. V., Higgie, M., McGuigan, K., & Blows, M. W. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.055 · Cited by 102
Recombination and the Divergence of Hybridizing Species
Ortíz-Barrientos, D., Reiland, J., Hey, J., & Noor, M. A. F. (2002) · Genetica · doi:10.1023/a:1021296829109 · Cited by 129
Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms
Radwan, J. (2007) · Genetica · doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9203-0 · Cited by 99
Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice
Chenoweth, S. F., & Blows, M. W. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1924 · Cited by 99
Brooks, R. C. (2002) · Genetica · doi:10.1023/a:1021228308636 · Cited by 99
Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress
Bussière, L. F., Hunt, J., Stölting, K. N., Jennions, M. D., & Brooks, R. C. (2007) · Genetica · doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9220-z · Cited by 96
Martínez‐Ruiz, C., & Knell, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12601 · Cited by 95
Components of phenotypic variation in avian ornamental and non-ornamental feathers
Cuervo, J. J., & Møller, A. P. (2001) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1011913804309 · Cited by 94
Kotiaho, J. S. (2002) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/13.6.791 · Cited by 94
Self-citationThe effect of past condition on a multicomponent sexual signal
Scheuber, H., Jacot, A., & Brinkhof, M. W. G. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2449 · Cited by 93
Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair
Janif, Z. J., Brooks, R. C., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2014) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0958 · Cited by 90
Miller, L. K., & Brooks, R. C. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00951.x · Cited by 89
Meta-analysis reveals that animal sexual signalling behaviour is honest and resource based
Dougherty, L. R. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01409-z · Cited by 81
GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION BY SEXUAL CONFLICT
Hayashi, T. I., Vose, M. D., & Sergey Gavrilets, B. (2007) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00059.x · Cited by 86
Reichard, M., Bryja, J., Ondračková, M., Dávidová, M., Kaniewska, P., & Smith, C. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02534.x · Cited by 84
Garant, D., Sheldon, B. C., & Gustafsson, L. (2004) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01685.x · Cited by 83
LEKKING BEHAVIOR OF ANASTREPHA FRATERCULUS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)
Segura, D. F., Petit‐Marty, N., Sciurano, R. B., Vera, M. T., Calcagno, G., Allinghi, A., Gómez-Cendra, P., Cladera, J. L., & Vilardi, J. C. (2007) · Florida Entomologist · doi:10.1653/0015-4040(2007)90[154:lboafd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 80
The effect of sexual selection on adaptation and extinction under increasing temperatures
Parrett, J. M., & Knell, R. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0303 · Cited by 79
Hunt, J., & Simmons, L. W. (2002) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00442.x · Cited by 80
Self-citationThe Effects of Inbreeding on Male Courtship Behaviour and Coloration in Guppies
Mariette, M., Kelley, J. L., Brooks, R., & Evans, J. P. (2006) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01236.x · Cited by 78
Rodrı́guez, R. L., & Greenfield, M. D. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00338.x · Cited by 78
The locus of sexual selection: moving sexual selection studies into the post‐genomics era
Wilkinson, G. S., Breden, F. J., Mank, J. E., Ritchie, M. G., Higginson, A. D., Radwan, J., Jaquiéry, J., Salzburger, W., Arriero, E., Barribeau, S. M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12621 · Cited by 77
Schizophrenia as one extreme of a sexually selected fitness indicator
Shaner, A. L., Miller, G. F., & Mintz, J. (2003) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.014 · Cited by 75
Copulatory courtship signals male genetic quality in cucumber beetles
Tallamy, D. W., Darlington, M. B., Pesek, J., & Powell, B. E. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2198 · Cited by 74
Roulin, A., & Bize, P. (2006) · Journal of Ethology · doi:10.1007/s10164-006-0006-z · Cited by 74
Pizzari, T. (2003) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arg048 · Cited by 74
A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects
Miller, C. W., & Moore, A. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0413 · Cited by 72
Simmons, L. W., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704871104 · Cited by 70
Self-citationEnvironment‐dependent selection on mate choice in a natural population of birds
Robinson, M. R., van Doorn, G. S., Gustafsson, L., & Qvarnström, A. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01780.x · Cited by 73
FEMALE CHOICE VIA INDICATOR TRAITS EASILY EVOLVES IN THE FACE OF RECOMBINATION AND MIGRATION
Proulx, S. R. (2001) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00755.x · Cited by 69
Sex differences in nutrient‐dependent reproductive ageing
Maklakov, A. A., Hall, M. D., Simpson, S. J., Dessmann, J., Clissold, F. J., Zajitschek, F., Lailvaux, S. P., Raubenheimer, D., Bonduriansky, R., & Brooks, R. C. (2009) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00479.x · Cited by 70
CALLING IS AN HONEST INDICATOR OF PATERNAL GENETIC QUALITY IN POISON FROGS
Forsman, A., & Hagman, M. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01852.x · Cited by 69
Kasumovic, M. M., Hall, M. D., & Brooks, R. C. (2012) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.230 · Cited by 68
Songs versus colours versus horns: what explains the diversity of sexually selected traits?
Wiens, J. J., & Tuschhoff, E. J. (2020) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12593 · Cited by 70
Female ornamentation and directional male mate preference in the rock sparrow
Griggio, M., Devigili, A., Hoi, H., & Pilastro, A. (2009) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arp099 · Cited by 67
Candolin, U. (2004) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00470.x · Cited by 67
Inbreeding, energy use and condition
Ketola, T., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2009) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01689.x · Cited by 65
Self-citationSire coloration influences offspring survival under predation risk in the moorfrog
Sheldon, B. C., Arponen, H., Laurila, A., Crochet, P., & Merilä, J. (2003) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00606.x · Cited by 63
Ritchie, M. G., Saarikettu, M., & Hoikkala, A. (2005) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.018 · Cited by 61
Ornamental bill color rapidly signals changing condition
Rosenthal, M. F., Murphy, T. G., Darling, N. E., & Tarvin, K. A. (2012) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-048x.2012.05774.x · Cited by 61
GENIC CAPTURE AND THE GENETIC BASIS OF SEXUALLY SELECTED TRAITS IN THE ZEBRA FINCH
Birkhead, T. R., Pellatt, E. J., Matthews, I. M., Roddis, N. J., Hunter, F. M., McPhie, F., & Castillo‐Juárez, H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01873.x · Cited by 60
Danielson‐François, A., Kelly, J. K., & Greenfield, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01006.x · Cited by 59
Beyond species recognition: somatic state affects long-distance sex pheromone communication
Chemnitz, J., Jentschke, P. C., Ayasse, M., & Steiger, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0832 · Cited by 58
Heritability of three condition surrogates in the yellow dung fly
Blanckenhorn, W. U. (2003) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arg052 · Cited by 58
Individual differences in developmental plasticity: A role for early androgens?
Giudice, M. D., Barrett, E. S., Belsky, J., Hartman, S., Martel, M. M., Sangenstedt, S., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2018) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.02.025 · Cited by 59
SEXUAL SELECTION CAN REMOVE AN EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED MUTATION LOAD
Almbro, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2013) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12238 · Cited by 57
Self-citationCondition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song
Brandt, L. S. E., & Greenfield, M. D. (2004) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00716.x · Cited by 57
The ecological causes and consequences of hard and soft selection
Bell, D. A., Kovach, R. P., Robinson, Z. L., Whiteley, A. R., & Reed, T. E. (2021) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13754 · Cited by 59
Radwan, J., Unrug, J., Snigorska, K., & Gawrońska, K. (2004) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00646.x · Cited by 56
Conceptual framework for assessment and management of ecosystem impacts of climate change
Prato, T. (2008) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.09.002 · Cited by 53
Mills, S. C., Alatalo, R. V., Koskela, E., Mappes, J., Mappes, T., & Oksanen, T. A. (2007) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00145.x · Cited by 52
Sinclair, B. J., Bretman, A. J., Tregenza, T., Tomkins, J. L., & Hosken, D. J. (2010) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.2010.00765.x · Cited by 49
Self-citationOn the evolution of heightened condition dependence of male sexual displays
Gosden, T. P., & Chenoweth, S. F. (2011) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02205.x · Cited by 47
Alexandra, P., & Roff, D. A. (2014) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12483 · Cited by 47
Russell Bonduriansky, A., Mallet, M. A., Arbuthnott, D., Pawlowsky‐Glahn, V., Egozcue, J. J., & Rundle, H. D. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12412 · Cited by 47
Drnevich, J. M., Reedy, M. M., Ruedi, E. A., Rodriguez‐Zas, S. L., & Hughes, K. A. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2880 · Cited by 47
Lewin, R. A. (2001) · Perspectives in biology and medicine · doi:10.1353/pbm.2001.0067 · Cited by 46
Condition Dependence of a Multicomponent Sexual Display Trait in Drosophila serrata
Delcourt, M., & Rundle, H. D. (2011) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/659949 · Cited by 45
Modality interactions alter the shape of acoustic mate preference functions in gray treefrogs
Reichert, M. S., & Höbel, G. (2015) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12750 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Kotiaho, J. S., Simmons, L. W., & Tomkins, J. L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kotiaho, Janne S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 410
- Issue
- 6829
- Pages
- 684-686
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1624004185
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 24.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Keywords
- lek paradox, female mate choice, good genes, genetic variance, directional selection, male condition, Onthophagus taurus, dung beetles, genetic correlation, sexual selection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Coleoptera, Courtship, Biological Evolution, Female, Food, Male, Models, Biological, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Genetic Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review