The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wing bone stresses in free flying bats and the evolution of skeletal design for flight
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological materials: Functional adaptations and bioinspired designs
Chen, P.-Y., McKittrick, J., & Meyers, M. A. (2012) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.001 · Cited by 766
De Margerie, E., Sanchez, S., Cubo, J., & Castanet, J. (2005) · The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1002/ar.a.20141 · Cited by 146
Cross sectional geometry of the forelimb skeleton and flight mode in pelecaniform birds
Simons, E. L. R., Hieronymus, T. L., & O'Connor, P. M. (2011) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.10963 · Cited by 55
Bennett, M. B. (2008) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.06.011 · Cited by 38
Self-citationWing bone laminarity is not an adaptation for torsional resistance in bats
Lee, A. H., & Simons, E. L. R. (2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.823 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Swartz, S. M., Bennett, M. B., & Carrier, D. R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 359
- Issue
- 6397
- Pages
- 726-729
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2040851406
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wing bone stresses in free flying bats and the evolution of skeletal design for flight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/359726a0
- The paper
- Swartz, S. M., Bennett, M. B., & Carrier, D. R. (1992). Wing bone stresses in free flying bats and the evolution of skeletal design for flight. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/359726a0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
