Cited by 292Climate Change Communication and PerceptionScience and Science EducationClimate Change Policy and Economics

Defeating the merchants of doubt

Oreskes, Naomi, Conway, Erik M.·2010·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/465686a

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Producing evidence of harm will be substantially more difficult if companies have a heavy hand in the production, funding, and communication of research.

    “Producing such evidence will be substantially more difficult if companies have a heavy hand in the production, funding, and communication of research (155, 156).”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [156]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-06
Volume
465
Issue
7299
Pages
686-687
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2063608708
Cited by
292
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
17.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change skepticism, climate science communication, history of science, science and politics, public understanding of science, science advocacy
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Communication, Human Activities, Public Opinion, Research Personnel, Consensus, Uncertainty, Trust, Global Warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review