Cited by 9Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Strength in numbers

Open access
Sheng, Morgan, Malinow, Roberto, Huganir, Richard·2013·Nature

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/493482a

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Granger et al. method would dramatically disrupt the composition of synapses and may not reflect the physiological mechanisms underlying LTP expression.

    “This method would dramatically disrupt the composition of synapses and may not reflect the physiological mechanisms underlying LTP expression (Sheng et al., 2013).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Sheng et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]Granger AJ Shi Y Lu W Cerpas M Nicoll RA Nature 2013 493 495 500 23235828 PMC3998843
  2. [2]Anggono V Huganir RL Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 2012 22 461 469 22217700 PMC3392447
  3. [3]Malinow R Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003 358 707 714 12740116 PMC1693162
  4. [5]Opazo P Sainlos M Choquet D Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 2012 22 453 460 22051694
  5. [6]Kim MJ Neuron 2007 56 488 502 17988632
  6. [7]Lee H-K Cell 2003 112 631 643 12628184
  7. [8]Steinberg JP Neuron 2006 49 845 860 16543133
  8. [9]Wu G-Y Malinow R Cline HT Science 1996 274 972 976 8875937
  9. [10]Tomita S Stein V Stocker TJ Nicoll RA Bredt DS Neuron 2005 45 269 277 15664178

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheng, M., Malinow, R., & Huganir, R.
Affiliations
  • Genentech (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sheng, Morgan
  • Malinow, Roberto
  • Huganir, Richard
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-01
Volume
493
Issue
7433
Pages
482-483
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2038372028
Cited by
9
References
10
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG032132)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091119, R01MH049159)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
long-term potentiation, synaptic plasticity, glutamate receptors, hippocampus, learning and memory, glutamatergic synapses, in vitro model
MeSH terms
Animals, Long-Term Potentiation, Protein Subunits, Receptors, Ionotropic Glutamate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review