Cited by 243Academic Publishing and Open AccessPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Writing and Publishing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility

Open access

·2013·Nature

DOI 10.1038/496398a

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/496398a

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Still being checked.

Sorted by citations

Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility
Collins, F. S., & Tabak, L. A. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/505612a · Cited by 1,247
Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research
Begley, C. G., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2015) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.114.303819 · Cited by 1,035
Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: A systems neuroscience perspective
Zuo, X., & Xing, X.-X. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009 · Cited by 678
How to measure and evaluate binding affinities
Jarmoskaite, I., AlSadhan, I., Vaidyanathan, P. P., & Herschlag, D. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.57264 · Cited by 514
Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging
Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3818 · Cited by 429
Risk of bias in reports of in vivo research: a focus for improvement
Macleod, M. R., Lawson McLean, A., Kyriakopoulou, A., Serghiou, S., de Wilde, A., Sherratt, N., Hirst, T., Hemblade, R., Bahor, Z., Nunes-Fonseca, C., et al. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273 · Cited by 358
CRED: Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicity data
Moermond, C., Kase, R., Korkaric, M., & Ågerstrand, M. (2015) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.3259 · Cited by 347
Reproduction study using public data of: Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs
Voets, M., Møllersen, K., & Bongo, L. A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217541 · Cited by 348
Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology
Errington, T. M., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.67995 · Cited by 345
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies
Baker, D., Lidster, K., Sottomayor, A., & Amor, S. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001756 · Cited by 305
Threats to Validity in the Design and Conduct of Preclinical Efficacy Studies: A Systematic Review of Guidelines for In Vivo Animal Experiments
Henderson, V. C., Kimmelman, J., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J., & Hackam, D. G. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001489 · Cited by 331
The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature
Bustin, S. A., Benes, V., Garson, J., Hellemans, J., Huggett, J., Kubista, M., Mueller, R., Nolan, T., Pfaffl, M. W., Shipley, G., et al. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2697 · Cited by 281
A resource for cell line authentication, annotation and quality control
Yu, M., Selvaraj, S. K., Liang-Chu, M. M. Y., Aghajani, S., Busse, M., Yuan, J., Lee, G., Peale, F., Klijn, C., Bourgon, R., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14397 · Cited by 225
Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies
Kafkafi, N., Agassi, J., Chesler, E. J., Crabbe, J. C., Crusio, W. E., Eilam, D., Gerlai, R., Golani, I., Gomez-Marin, A., Heller, R., et al. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.003 · Cited by 215
Curation of chemogenomics data
Fourches, D., Muratov, E. N., & Tropsha, A. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1881 · Cited by 200
Pain and laboratory animals: publication practices for better data reproducibility and better animal welfare
Carbone, L., & Austin, J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155001 · Cited by 191
Toward the Geoscience Paper of the Future: Best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance
Gil, Y., David, C. H., Demir, İ., Essawy, B. T., Fulweiler, R. W., Goodall, J. L., Karlstrom, L., Lee, H., Mills, H. J., Oh, J., et al. (2016) · Earth and Space Science · doi:10.1002/2015ea000136 · Cited by 199
ARRIVE has not ARRIVEd: Support for the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments) guidelines does not improve the reporting quality of papers in animal welfare, analgesia or anesthesia
Leung, V., Rousseau-Blass, F., Beauchamp, G., & Pang, D. S. J. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197882 · Cited by 172
Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility
Piccolo, S., & Frampton, M. (2016) · GigaScience · doi:10.1186/s13742-016-0135-4 · Cited by 179
A consensus-based transparency checklist
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., Chambers, C. D., Fisher, A., Gelman, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6 · Cited by 152
Principles of Sound Ecotoxicology
Harris, C. A., Scott, A. P., Johnson, A. C., Panter, G. H., Sheahan, D., Roberts, M., & Sumpter, J. P. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4047507 · Cited by 158
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
Carneiro, C. F. D., Queiroz, V. G. S., Moulin, T. C., Carvalho, C. A. M., Haas, C. B., Rayêe, D., Henshall, D. E., De-Souza, E. A., Amorim, F. E., Boos, F. Z., et al. (2020) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3 · Cited by 146
Editorial: preclinical data reproducibility for R&D - the challenge for neuroscience
Steckler, T. (2015) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/2193-1801-4-1 · Cited by 143
Pattern recognition in chemometrics
Brereton, R. G. (2015) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.06.012 · Cited by 139
Methodological Rigor in Preclinical Cardiovascular Studies: Targets to Enhance Reproducibility and Promote Research Translation
Ramirez, F. D., Motazedian, P., Jung, R. G., Di Santo, P., MacDonald, Z. D., Moreland, R., Simard, T., Clancy, A. A., Russo, J. J., Welch, V. A., et al. (2017) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.117.310628 · Cited by 138
Reproducibility: changing the policies and culture of cell line authentication
Freedman, L. P., Gibson, M. C., Ethier, S. P., Soule, H. R., Neve, R. M., & Reid, Y. A. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3403 · Cited by 136
R Markdown: Integrating A Reproducible Analysis Tool into Introductory Statistics
Baumer, B. S., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., Bray, A. P., Loi, L., & Horton, N. J. (2014) · Technology Innovations in Statistics Education · doi:10.5070/t581020118 · Cited by 136
A checklist is associated with increased quality of reporting preclinical biomedical research: A systematic review
Han, S., Olonisakin, T. F., Pribis, J. P., Zupetic, J., Yoon, J. H., Holleran, K. M., Jeong, K., Shaikh, N., Rubio, D. M., & Lee, J. S. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183591 · Cited by 131
Bringing rigour to translational medicine
Howells, D. W., Sena, E. S., & Macleod, M. R. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.232 · Cited by 130
Irreproducibility in hydrogen storage material research
Broom, D. P., & Hirscher, M. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee01435f · Cited by 130
Biobanking 3.0: Evidence based and customer focused biobanking
Simeon‐Dubach, D., & Watson, P. H. (2014) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.12.018 · Cited by 123
The Experimental Design Assistant
Percie du Sert, N., Bamsey, I., Bate, S. T., Berdoy, M., Clark, R. A., Cuthill, I., Fry, D., Karp, N. A., Macleod, M., Moon, L., et al. (2017) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003779 · Cited by 118
Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: RT-qPCR as a paradigm for the lack of reproducibility in molecular research
Bustin, S., & Nolan, T. (2017) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.12801 · Cited by 113
Reproducibility and Rigor in Animal-Based Research
Macleod, M., & Mohan, S. (2019) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar/ilz015 · Cited by 104
PsychDisclosure.org
LeBel, E. P., Borsboom, D., Giner‐Sorolla, R., Hasselman, F., Peters, K. R., Ratliff, K. A., & Smith, C. T. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613491437 · Cited by 106
Did a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting?
The NPQIP Collaborative group, Study steering committee, Macleod, M., Sena, E., Howells, D., Macleod, M., Sena, E., Howells, D., Kiermer, V., Swaminathan, S., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open Science · doi:10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035 · Cited by 102
Reproducibility of research and preclinical validation: problems and solutions
Pusztai, L., Hatzis, C., & André, F. (2013) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.171 · Cited by 98
Reveal, Don’t Conceal: Transforming Data Visualization to Improve Transparency
Weissgerber, T. L., Winham, S. J., Heinzen, E. P., Milin-Lazovic, J. S., Garcia-Valencia, O., Bukumiric, Z., Savic, M. D., Garovic, V. D., & Milic, N. M. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.037777 · Cited by 101
Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive
Bissell, M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/503333a · Cited by 99
Will It Ever Be FAIR?: Making Archaeological Data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable
Nicholson, C., Kansa, S., Gupta, N., & Fernandez, R. (2023) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2022.40 · Cited by 77
The Increasing Urgency for Standards in Basic Biologic Research
Freedman, L. P., & Inglese, J. (2014) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-0925 · Cited by 89
The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods
Menke, J., Roelandse, M., Ozyurt, B., Martone, M., & Bandrowski, A. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101698 · Cited by 90
Minimum Information Necessary for Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments
Johnson, G. L., Nour, A. M. A., Nolan, T., Huggett, J. F., & Bustin, S. A. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0733-5_2 · Cited by 87
Animal models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A machine-assisted systematic review and meta-analysis
Currie, G. L., Angel-Scott, H. N., Colvin, L., Cramond, F., Hair, K., Khandoker, L., Liao, J., Macleod, M. R., McCann, S., Morland, R., et al. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000243 · Cited by 84
The future of whole-cell modeling
Macklin, D. N., Ruggero, N. A., & Covert, M. W. (2014) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.01.012 · Cited by 86
Reproducing Statistical Results
Stodden, V. (2015) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020127 · Cited by 77
The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciences
Macleod, M., Collings, A. M., Graf, C., Kiermer, V., Mellor, D., Swaminathan, S., Sweet, D., & Vinson, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2103238118 · Cited by 77
Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'
Weissgerber, T. L., Garcia-Valencia, O., Garovic, V. D., Milic, N. M., & Winham, S. J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.36163 · Cited by 76
Big Data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone
Lagoze, C. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714558281 · Cited by 75
Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists
Weissgerber, T. L., Garovic, V. D., Milin-Lazovic, J. S., Winham, S. J., Zoran Obradovic, A., Trzeciakowski, J. P., & Milic, N. M. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002430 · Cited by 73
Fair game? Producing and publishing gambling research
Cassidy, R. (2014) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2014.971420 · Cited by 69
Laboratory environmental factors and pain behavior: the relevance of unknown unknowns to reproducibility and translation
Mogil, J. S. (2017) · Lab Animal · doi:10.1038/laban.1223 · Cited by 71
Current Status and Limitations of Myocardial Infarction Large Animal Models in Cardiovascular Translational Research
Shin, H. S., Shin, H., & Shudo, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.673683 · Cited by 63
Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions
Ware, J. J., & Munafo, M. R. (2014) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12673 · Cited by 64
RIPOSTE: a framework for improving the design and analysis of laboratory-based research
Masca, N. G. D., Hensor, E. M. A., Cornelius, V. R., Buffa, F. M., Marriott, H. M., Eales, J., Messenger, M. P., Anderson, A. E., Boot, C., Bunce, C., et al. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.05519 · Cited by 59
The reproducibility of biomedical research: Sleepers awake!
Bustin, S. A. (2014) · Biomolecular Detection and Quantification · doi:10.1016/j.bdq.2015.01.002 · Cited by 61
Changing the Mindset in Life Sciences Toward Translation: A Consensus
Duda, G. N., Grainger, D. W., Frisk, M. L., Bruckner‐Tuderman, L., Carr, A. J., Dirnagl, U., Einhäupl, K. M., Gottschalk, S. M., Gruskin, E. A., Huber, C., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0599 · Cited by 57
Ten Basic Rules of Antibody Validation
Weller, M. G. (2018) · Analytical Chemistry Insights · doi:10.1177/1177390118757462 · Cited by 55
Randomization Does Not Help Much, Comparability Does
Saint‐Mont, U. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132102 · Cited by 55
Sustainability in Biobanking
Simeon‐Dubach, D., & Henderson, M. K. (2014) · Biopreservation and Biobanking · doi:10.1089/bio.2014.1251 · Cited by 53
Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation
Cashin, A. G., Bagg, M. K., Richards, G. C., Toomey, E. C., McAuley, J. H., & Lee, H. (2020) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111296 · Cited by 59
Benchmark of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis on Measuring Nanoparticle Sizing and Concentration
Maguire, C. M., Sillence, K., Roesslein, M., Hannell, C., Suárez, G., Sauvain, J., Capracotta, S. S., Contal, S., Cambier, S., Yamani, N. E., et al. (2017) · Journal of Micro and Nano-Manufacturing · doi:10.1115/1.4037124 · Cited by 52
A short history of chemometrics: a personal view
Brereton, R. G. (2014) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.2633 · Cited by 52
Transparency in Research involving Animals: The Basel Declaration and new principles for reporting research in BJP manuscripts
McGrath, J. C., McLachlan, E. M., & Zeller, R. (2015) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.12956 · Cited by 52
Quality control of protein reagents for the improvement of research data reproducibility
de Marco, A., Berrow, N. S., Lebendiker, M., García-Alai, M., Knauer, S. H., Mendez, B. L., Matagne, A., Parret, A. H. A., Remans, K., Uebel, S. F. W., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23167-z · Cited by 56
Selective Inference: The Silent Killer of Replicability
Benjamini, Y. (2020) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.fc62b261 · Cited by 54
CiteAb: a searchable antibody database that ranks antibodies by the number of times they have been cited
Helsby, M. A., Leader, P. M., Fenn, J. R., Gülşen, T., Bryant, C., Doughton, G., Sharpe, B. P., Whitley, P. R., Caunt, C. J., James, K., et al. (2014) · BMC Cell Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2121-15-6 · Cited by 47
Irreproducibility of published bioscience research: Diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy
Flier, J. S. (2016) · Molecular Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2016.11.006 · Cited by 45
Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope
du Sert, N. P., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Altman, D. G., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., et al. (2018) · BMJ Open Science · doi:10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002 · Cited by 48
The National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
Moher, D., Avey, M. T., Antes, G., & Altman, D. G. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0284-9 · Cited by 43
Quantifying research waste in ecology
Purgar, M., Klanjšček, T., & Čulina, A. (2022) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01820-0 · Cited by 49
Reproducibility of Results in Preclinical Studies: A Perspective From the Bone Field
Manolagas, S. C., & Kronenberg, H. M. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.2293 · Cited by 43
Late Mitochondrial Origin Is an Artifact
Martin, W. F., Roettger, M., Ku, C., Garg, S. G., Nelson-Sathi, S., & Landan, G. (2017) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evx027 · Cited by 42
Improving Reproducibility in Toxicology
Miller, G. W. (2014) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfu050 · Cited by 46
Guidelines for manuscript submission in the peer-reviewed pharmacological literature
Mullane, K., Enna, S. J., Piette, J. G., & Williams, M. J. (2015) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2015.06.023 · Cited by 42
Current Status of Single Particle Imaging with X-ray Lasers
Sun, Z., Fan, J., Li, H., & Jiang, H. (2018) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app8010132 · Cited by 41
Slide Set: Reproducible Image Analysis and Batch Processing with ImageJ
Nanes, B. A. (2015) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000114351 · Cited by 38
Lost in space: design of experiments and scientific exploration in a Hogarth Universe
Lendrem, D. W., Lendrem, C., Woods, D. C., Rowland‐Jones, R. C., Burke, M. D., Chatfield, M. J., Isaacs, J. D., & Owen, M. R. (2015) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2015.09.015 · Cited by 37
Publishers’ Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility
Hrynaszkiewicz, I. (2019) · Handbook of experimental pharmacology · doi:10.1007/164_2019_290 · Cited by 37
Translational paradigms in pharmacology and drug discovery
Mullane, K., Winquist, R. J., & Williams, M. J. (2013) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2013.10.019 · Cited by 34
Longitudinal Analysis of Image Time Series with Diffeomorphic Deformations: A Computational Framework Based on Stationary Velocity Fields
Hadj-Hamou, M., Lorenzi, M., Ayache, N., & Pennec, X. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00236 · Cited by 32
Transparent reporting for reproducible science
Weissgerber, T. L., Garovic, V. D., Winham, S. J., Milic, N. M., & Prager, E. M. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.23785 · Cited by 33
Reporting research antibody use: how to increase experimental reproducibility
Helsby, M. A., Fenn, J. R., & Chalmers, A. D. (2013) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.2-153.v2 · Cited by 29
Data‐driven glass/ceramic science research: Insights from the glass and ceramic and data science/informatics communities
Guire, E. D., Bartolo, L. M., Brindle, R., Devanathan, R., Dickey, E. C., Fessler, J., French, R. H., Fotheringham, U., Harmer, M. P., Lara‐Curzio, E., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/jace.16677 · Cited by 30
Framework for advancing rigorous research
Koroshetz, W. J., Behrman, S., Brame, C. J., Branchaw, J. L., Brown, E. N., Clark, E. A., Dockterman, D., Elm, J. J., Gay, P. L., Green, K. M., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.55915 · Cited by 28
A Duty to Describe
Brown, S. D., Furrow, D. R., Hill, D. F., Gable, J. C., Porter, L. P., & Jacobs, W. J. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614551749 · Cited by 31
Reproducibility
Boylan, J. E. (2016) · IMA Journal of Management Mathematics · doi:10.1093/imaman/dpw003 · Cited by 28
Retracted
Protocol for a retrospective, controlled cohort study of the impact of a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research on the completeness of reporting study design and execution
Cramond, F., Irvine, C., Liao, J., Howells, D. W., Sena, E. S., Currie, G. L., & Macleod, M. R. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1964-8 · Cited by 30
The elephant in the room: reproducibility in toxicology
Poland, C. A., Miller, M. R., Duffin, R., & Cassee, F. R. (2014) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-014-0042-8 · Cited by 30
Temporospatial shifts within commercial laboratory mouse gut microbiota impact experimental reproducibility
Mandal, R. K., Denny, J. E., Waide, M. L., Li, Q., Bhutiani, N., Anderson, C. D., Baby, B. V., Jala, V. R., Egilmez, N. K., & Schmidt, N. W. (2020) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-020-00810-7 · Cited by 29
The MyD88 rs6853 and TIRAP rs8177374 polymorphic sites are associated with resistance to human pulmonary tuberculosis
Capparelli, R., Chiara, F. D., Matteo, A. D., Medaglia, C., & Iannelli, D. (2013) · Genes and Immunity · doi:10.1038/gene.2013.48 · Cited by 28
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literaturePreprint
Carneiro, C. F. D., Queiroz, V. G. S., Moulin, T. C., de Carvalho, C. A. M., Haas, C. B., Rayêe, D., Henshall, D. E., De‐Souza, E. A., Amorim, F. E., Boos, F. Z., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/581892 · Cited by 28
Psychology Exceptionalism and the Multiple Discovery of the Replication Crisis
Nelson, N. C., Chung, J., Ichikawa, K., & Malik, M. M. (2021) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680211046508 · Cited by 27
Predicting rock type from MWD tunnel data using a reproducible ML-modelling process
Hansen, T. F., Liu, Z., & Tørresen, J. (2024) · Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tust.2024.105843 · Cited by 26
Preclinical data reproducibility for R&D—the challenge for neuroscience
Steckler, T. (2015) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-014-3836-3 · Cited by 25
From methods to monographs: fostering a culture of research quality
Crawford, D. C., Hoye, M. L., & Silberberg, S. D. (2023) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0247-23.2023 · Cited by 25
Bridging the gap between academic research and regulatory health risk assessment of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
Beronius, A., Hanberg, A., Zilliacus, J., & Rudén, C. (2014) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2014.08.005 · Cited by 25
Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability
Katavić, V. (2014) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2014.024 · Cited by 27
Findings of a retrospective, controlled cohort study of the impact of a change in Nature journals' editorial policy for life sciences research on the completeness of reporting study design and executionPreprint
Macleod, M. R., & The NPQIP Collaborative group (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/187245 · Cited by 27
Glial cells as drug targets: What does it take?
Möller, T., & Boddeke, H. W. G. M. (2016) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.22993 · Cited by 24

Venue: Nature
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2013-04
Volume: 496
Issue: 7446
Pages: 398-398
ISSN: 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/496398a
OpenAlex: W4237866497
Cited by: 243
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 16
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords: research reproducibility, research reliability, peer review, publication practices, research integrity, scientific journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks