Cited by 664Plant Genetic and Mutation StudiesCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

Genome-wide, large-scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis

Open access
de Angelis, Martin Hrabé, Flaswinkel, Heinrich, Fuchs, Helmut, Rathkolb, Birgit, Soewarto, Dian, Marschall, Susan, Heffner, Stephan, Pargent, Walter +29 more·2000·Nature Genetics

Abstract

In the post-genome era, the mouse will have a major role as a model system for functional genome analysis. This requires a large number of mutants similar to the collections available from other model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans. Here we report on a systematic, genome-wide, mutagenesis screen in mice. As part of the German Human Genome Project, we have undertaken a large-scale ENU-mutagenesis screen for dominant mutations and a limited screen for recessive mutations. In screening over 14,000 mice for a large number of clinically relevant parameters, we recovered 182 mouse mutants for a variety of phenotypes. In addition, 247 variant mouse mutants are currently in genetic confirmation testing and will result in additional new mutant lines. This mutagenesis screen, along with the screen described in the accompanying paper, leads to a significant increase in the number of mouse models available to the scientific community. Our mutant lines are freely accessible to non-commercial users (for information, see http://www.gsf.de/ieg/groups/enu-mouse.html).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/78146

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several mouse coat color mutants are ribosomal proteins, although they are not the ribosomal components enriched here.

    “Pigment cell enrichment of ribosomal components is not surprising, considering several mouse coat color mutants are ribosomal proteins, although they are not the ribosomal components enriched here [50]–[53].”

    From Gene Expression Analysis of Zebrafish Melanocytes, Iridophores, and Retinal Pigmented Epithelium Reveals Indicators of Biological Function and Developmental Origin (2013) · cites this paper as [53]

    The indexed copy's bibliographic entry (section ‘1999 (7)’, no page) identifies the paper but provides no findings about coat color mutants or ribosomal proteins. Searches for those terms and for pigmentation returned only catalog material, so the claim cannot be checked against the available text. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Angelis, M. H., Flaswinkel, H., Fuchs, H., Rathkolb, B., Soewarto, D., Marschall, S., Heffner, S., Pargent, W., Wuensch, K., Jung, M., Reis, A., Richter, T., Alessandrini, F., Jakob, T., Fuchs, E., Kolb, H., Kremmer, E., Schaeble, K., Rollinski, B., Roscher, A., Peters, C., Meitinger, T., Strom, T., Steckler, T., Holsboer, F., Klopstock, T., Gekeler, F., Schindewolf, C., Jung, T., Avraham, K., Behrendt, H., Ring, J., Zimmer, A., Schughart, K., Pfeffer, K., Wolf, E., & Balling, R.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • München Klinik Harlaching (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Federal Office for Radiation Protection (DE)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Transgene (France) (FR)
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2000-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
444-447
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2121157101
Cited by
664
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 38
FWCI
78.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
ENU mutagenesis, mouse mutants, dominant mutations, recessive mutations, mouse model, functional genomics
MeSH terms
Animals, Crosses, Genetic, Ethylnitrosourea, Female, Forelimb, Immunoglobulin E, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Immunity, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mutagens, Mutation, Phenotype, Cryopreservation, Mutagenesis, Genome, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review