Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease With Urinary Metabolic Profiling

Williams, Horace R T, Cox, I Jane, Walker, David G, North, Bernard V, Patel, Venisha M, Marshall, Sara E, Jewell, Derek P, Ghosh, Subrata, Thomas, Huw J W, Teare, Julian P, Jakobovits, Simon, Zeki, Sebastian, Welsh, Kenneth I, Taylor-Robinson, Simon D, Orchard, Timothy R·2009·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Distinguishing between the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC) is important for both management and prognostic reasons. Discrimination using noninvasive techniques could be an adjunct to conventional diagnostics. Differences have been shown between the intestinal microbiota of CD and UC patients and controls; the gut bacteria influence specific urinary metabolites that are quantifiable using proton high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. This study tested the hypothesis that such metabolites differ between IBD and control cohorts, and that using multivariate pattern-recognition analysis, the cohorts could be distinguished by urine NMR spectroscopy. METHODS: NMR spectra were acquired from urine samples of 206 Caucasian subjects (86 CD patients, 60 UC patients, and 60 healthy controls). Longitudinal samples were collected from 75 individuals. NMR resonances specific for metabolites influenced by the gut microbes were studied, including hippurate, formate, and 4-cresol sulfate. Multivariate analysis of all urinary metabolites involved principal components analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). RESULTS: Hippurate levels were lowest in CD patients and differed significantly between the three cohorts (P<0.0001). Formate levels were higher and 4-cresol sulfate levels lower in CD patients than in UC patients or controls (P=0.0005 and P=0.0002, respectively). PCA revealed clustering of the groups; PLS-DA modeling was able to distinguish the cohorts. These results were independent of medication and diet and were reproducible in the longitudinal cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Specific urinary metabolites related to gut microbial metabolism differ between CD patients, UC patients, and controls. The emerging technique of urinary metabolic profiling with multivariate analysis was able to distinguish these cohorts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2009.175

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Williams, H. R. T., Cox, I. J., Walker, D. G., North, B. V., Patel, V. M., Marshall, S. E., Jewell, D. P., Ghosh, S., Thomas, H. J. W., Teare, J. P., Jakobovits, S., Zeki, S., Welsh, K. I., Taylor-Robinson, S. D., & Orchard, T. R.
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2009-04-28
Volume
104
Issue
6
Pages
1435-1444
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2037785161
Cited by
183
References
2
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease With Urinary Metabolic Profiling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ajg.2009.175
The paper
Williams, H. R. T., Cox, I. J., Walker, D. G., North, B. V., Patel, V. M., Marshall, S. E., Jewell, D. P., Ghosh, S., Thomas, H. J. W., Teare, J. P., Jakobovits, S., Zeki, S., Welsh, K. I., Taylor-Robinson, S. D., & Orchard, T. R. (2009). Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease With Urinary Metabolic Profiling. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.