Cited by 610Pancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentRadiology practices and educationPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on MR imaging

Lee, Karen S, Sekhar, Aarti, Rofsky, Neil M, Pedrosa, Ivan·2010·American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The reporting of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions on cross-sectional imaging studies has dramatically increased over the last few years. The prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population, however, is unknown. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of incidentally detected pancreatic cysts in the adult population undergoing abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. METHODS: MR imaging examinations of 616 consecutive patients obtained between January 2001 and February 2002 were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists and the following information was recorded: the total number of pancreatic cysts; the maximum diameter, location, and characteristics of the largest cyst; documentation of the cyst(s) within the radiology report; and characteristics of the cyst(s) at imaging follow-up. RESULTS: Incidental pancreatic cysts were present in 13.5% (83/616) of patients, with 60% of the cysts being solitary, and 88% of the cysts being simple. Largest cyst mean and median diameters were 7.4 mm (2-24 mm) and 6 mm, respectively. Both the prevalence of pancreatic cysts and the mean size of the largest cyst increased with age (P=0.007, r=0.893 and P=0.003, r=0.929, respectively). Only 31% (26/83) of incidental pancreatic cysts were documented in the radiology report. The mean size of reported pancreatic cysts was larger than those cysts that were not reported (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of incidentally detected pancreatic cysts on MR imaging is 13.5%, and increases with age. A majority of these cysts are not reported on MR imaging studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2010.122

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pancreatic cysts are found in approximately 8% of individuals older than 70 years.

    “Pancreatic cysts are found in approximately 8% of individuals older than 70 years.38”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, K. S., Sekhar, A., Rofsky, N. M., & Pedrosa, I.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Karen S
Venue
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2010-09
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pages
2079-2084
ISSN
0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024951572
Cited by
610
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 18
FWCI
23.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
incidental pancreatic cysts, pancreatic cysts, prevalence, magnetic resonance imaging, cyst size, age-related prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Cyst, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence, Incidental Findings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review