The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Rapid Swallow Responses During Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Reflect Esophageal Body Peristaltic Reserve
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Dysphagia may develop following antireflux surgery as a consequence of poor esophageal peristaltic reserve. We hypothesized that suboptimal contraction response following multiple rapid swallows (MRS) could be associated with chronic transit symptoms following antireflux surgery. METHODS: Wet swallow and MRS responses on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) were characterized collectively in the esophageal body (distal contractile integral (DCI)), and individually in each smooth muscle contraction segment (S2 and S3 amplitudes) in 63 patients undergoing antireflux surgery and in 18 healthy controls. Dysphagia was assessed using symptom questionnaires. The MRS/wet swallow ratios were calculated for S2 and S3 peak amplitudes and DCI. MRS responses were compared in patients with and without late postoperative dysphagia following antireflux surgery. RESULTS: Augmentation of smooth muscle contraction (MRS/wet swallow ratios >1.0) as measured collectively by DCI was seen in only 11.1% with late postoperative dysphagia, compared with 63.6% in those with no dysphagia and 78.1% in controls (P≤0.02 for each comparison). Similar results were seen with S3 but not S2 peak amplitude ratios. Receiver operating characteristics identified a DCI MRS/wet swallow ratio threshold of 0.85 in segregating patients with late postoperative dysphagia from those with no postoperative dysphagia with a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.64. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of augmentation of smooth muscle contraction following MRS is associated with late postoperative dysphagia following antireflux surgery, suggesting that MRS responses could assess esophageal smooth muscle peristaltic reserve. Further research is warranted to determine if antireflux surgery needs to be tailored to the MRS response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus
Gyawali, C. P., Kahrilas, P. J., Savarino, E., Zerbib, F., Mion, F., Smout, A. J. P. M., Vaezi, M., Sifrim, D., Fox, M. R., Vela, M. F., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722 · Cited by 1,457
Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©
Yadlapati, R., Kahrilas, P. J., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A. J., Prakash Gyawali, C., Roman, S., Babaei, A., Mittal, R. K., Rommel, N., Savarino, E., et al. (2021) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.14058 · Cited by 1,080
Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Gyawali, C. P., & Fass, R. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.049 · Cited by 346
Esophageal motor dysfunctions in gastroesophageal reflux disease and therapeutic perspectives
Lin, S., Li, H., & Fang, X. (2019) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm19081 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaker, A., Stoikes, N., Drapekin, J., Kushnir, V., Brunt, M. L., & Gyawali, P. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1706-1712
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017475244
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Rapid Swallow Responses During Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Reflect Esophageal Body Peristaltic Reserve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ajg.2013.289
- The paper
- Shaker, A., Stoikes, N., Drapekin, J., Kushnir, V., Brunt, M. L., & Gyawali, P. C. (2013). Multiple Rapid Swallow Responses During Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Reflect Esophageal Body Peristaltic Reserve. American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.