Cited by 465Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningHead and Neck Cancer Studies

Predicting the Future Burden of Esophageal Cancer by Histological Subtype: International Trends in Incidence up to 2030

Arnold, Melina, Laversanne, Mathieu, Brown, Linda Morris, Devesa, Susan S, Bray, Freddie·2017·American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rapid increases in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in high-income countries in the past decades have raised public health concerns. This study is the first to predict the future burden of esophageal cancer by histological subtype using international incidence data. METHODS: Data on esophageal cancer incidence by year of diagnosis, sex, histology, and age group were extracted from 42 registries in 12 countries included in the last three volumes (VIII-X) of Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, contributing at least 15 years of consecutive data. Numbers of new cases and incidence rates were predicted up to 2030 by fitting and extrapolating age-period-cohort models; the differential impact of demographic vs. risk changes on future cases were examined. RESULTS: The number of new AC cases is expected to increase rapidly 2005-2030 in all studied countries as a combined result of increasing risk and changing demographics. In contrast, the incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is predicted to continue decreasing in most countries. By 2030, 1 in 100 men in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are predicted to be diagnosed with EAC during their lifetime. CONCLUSIONS: The burden from EAC is expected to rise dramatically across high-income countries and has already or will surpass ESCC incidence in the coming years, especially among men. Notwithstanding the inherent uncertainties in trend-based predictions and in subtype misclassification, these findings highlight an ongoing transition in the epidemiology of esophageal cancer that is highly relevant to future cancer control planning and clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2017.155

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnold, M., Laversanne, M., Brown, L. M., Devesa, S. S., & Bray, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Arnold, Melina
Venue
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2017-08
Volume
112
Issue
8
Pages
1247-1255
ISSN
0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2621568616
Cited by
465
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 1
FWCI
31.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
esophageal cancer, esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, histological subtypes, incidence trends, age-period-cohort model, high-income countries, cancer control planning
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review