Cited by 40Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children: How Many Measurements are Needed?

Stergiou, G. S., Christodoulakis, G., Giovas, P., Lourida, P., Alamara, C., Roussias, L. G.·2008·American Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the minimum schedule of blood pressure (BP) measurements necessary to provide a reliable assessment of home BP (HBP) in children and adolescents. METHODS: Subjects aged 6-18 years referred for elevated BP were assessed with HBP monitoring (6 workdays, duplicate morning and evening measurements) and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABP). Criteria for HBP reliability were its reproducibility (test-retest correlations and SD of differences (SDDs) between repeated measurements), its stability (average home BP of an increasing number of readings and its SD), and its relationship with ABP. RESULTS: Data from 100 subjects were analyzed (mean age 13 +/- 2.8 (SD) years, 61 boys). The reproducibility of 3-day HBP (r 0.88/0.79, SDDs 5.1/4.9, systolic/diastolic) was superior to that of a single (r 0.79/0.65, SDDs 7.6/7.1) or 2-day HBP (r 0.85/0.72, SDDs 6.1/5.4). By averaging up to 12 readings (3 days), there was a progressive decline in average HBP, with no further decline thereafter. The SD of average HBP was also progressively reduced, with little change after day 3. The association of HBP with ABP was improved by averaging more readings up to 12, with no further improvement when more readings were averaged. The exclusion of first-day measurements slightly increased the SD of average HBP and weakened the correlation with ABP, probably due to reduced number of readings. CONCLUSIONS: In children and adolescents, 3-day monitoring with duplicate morning and evening measurements appears to be the minimum schedule for the reliable assessment of HBP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajh.2008.38

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stergiou, G. S., Christodoulakis, G., Giovas, P., Lourida, P., Alamara, C., & Roussias, L. G.
Affiliations
Sotiria General Hospital (GR)
Venue
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
633-638
ISSN
  • 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7225
OpenAlex
W2160521270
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
home blood pressure monitoring, children, adolescents, hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, measurement reliability, reproducibility, test-retest correlation, coefficient of variation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Blood Pressure Determination, Child, Home Care Services, Humans, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review