Cited by 59Coenzyme Q10 studies and effectsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Failure Treatment and Management

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study of Coenzyme Q10 Therapy in Hypertensive Patients With the Metabolic Syndrome

Young, J. M., Florkowski, C. M., Molyneux, S. L., McEwan, R. G., Frampton, C. M., Nicholls, M. G., Scott, R. S., George, P. M.·2012·American Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

Background Our aim was to examine the effects of adjunctive coenzyme Q(10) therapy on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in subjects with the metabolic syndrome and inadequate BP control. Methods In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week crossover trial, coenzyme Q(10) (100 mg twice daily) or placebo was administrated to 30 subjects with the metabolic syndrome, and inadequate BP control (an average clinic BP of ≥140 systolic mm Hg or ≥130 mm Hg for patients with type 2 diabetes) while taking an unchanged, conventional antihypertensive regimen. Clinic and 24-h ambulatory BP were assessed pre- and post-treatment phases. The primary outcomes were the changes in 24-h systolic and diastolic BP during adjunctive therapy with coenzyme Q(10) vs. placebo and prespecified secondary outcomes included changes in BP loads. Results Compared with placebo, treatment with coenzyme Q(10) was not associated with statistically significant reductions in systolic (P = 0.60) or diastolic 24-h ambulatory BP (P = 0.12) or heart rate (P = 0.10), although daytime diastolic BP loads, were significantly lower during coenzyme Q(10) administration with thresholds set at >90 mm Hg (P = 0.007) and ≥85 mm Hg (P = 0.03). Coenzyme Q(10) was well tolerated and was not associated with any clinically relevant changes in safety parameters. Conclusions Although it is possible that coenzyme Q(10) may improve BP control under some circumstances, any effects are likely to be smaller than reported in pr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajh.2011.209

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, J. M., Florkowski, C. M., Molyneux, S. L., McEwan, R. G., Frampton, C. M., Nicholls, M. G., Scott, R. S., & George, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Christchurch Hospital (NZ)
  • Canterbury Health Laboratories (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Young, J. M.
Venue
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
261-270
ISSN
  • 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7225
OpenAlex
W2327708061
Cited by
59
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
coenzyme Q10, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure control, blood pressure load, heart rate, tolerability
MeSH terms
Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Antioxidants, Blood Pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Ubiquinone, Vitamins, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review