The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A critique of the evidence for active host defence against cancer, based on personal studies of 27 murine tumours of spontaneous origin
Open accessAbstract
Extensive experience with isotransplants of 27 different tumours (leukaemias, sarcomata, carcinomata), all of strictly spontaneous origin in laboratory bred mice of low cancer strains CBA/Ht and WHT/Ht, has revealed no evidence of tumour immunogenicity. Of approximately 20,000 maintenance transplants, none failed and none regressed; of almost 10,000 carefully observed tumours arising from small or minimal inocula of tumour cells, none spontaneously regressed. The number of injected viable tumour cells required to give a 50% probability of successful transplantation (the TD50) ranged from approximately 1 cell to greater than 10,000 cells among the 27 tumours; high TD50 values, which were dramatically reduced by various procedures having no immunological significance, did not signify active "resistance" of the hosts. In the case of all of 7 randomly selected tumours, prior "immunization" of recipients with homologous lethally irradiated cells increased their tumour receptivity. Several experiments using various tumours failed to give evidence that immunity could be non-specifically induced or that a massive preponderance of lymphocytes from specifically sensitized mice could inhibit tumour transplantation or growth in vivo; no trace of "resistance" to tumour was adopted by isogeneic recipients of lymphocytes from regional nodes of tumour bearers. A limited review of the recent literature on tumour immunity shows that practically all the animal data presented in support of a general theory of tumour immunogenicity or to provide a basis for active clinical immunotherapy have been obtained from transplanted tumour systems which entail artefactual immunity associated with viral or chemical induction of the tumours or their allogeneic transplantation. It is suggested that isotransplants of spontaneously arising tumours are the only appropriate models of human cancer and that any genuine rapport between the animal laboratory and the clinic requires their exclusive use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chen, L., Ashe, S., Brady, W. A., Hellström, I., Hellström, K. E., Ledbetter, J. A., McGowan, P., & Linsley, P. S. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80059-5 · Cited by 1,050
Fearon, E. R., Pardoll, D. M., Itaya, T., Golumbek, P., Levitsky, H. I., Simons, J. W., Karasuyama, H., Vogelstein, B., & Frost, P. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90591-2 · Cited by 916
Identification and characterization of leukemia stem cells in murine MLL-AF9 acute myeloid leukemia
Somervaille, T. C. P., & Cleary, M. L. (2006) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.08.020 · Cited by 582
Nicolson, G. L. (1982) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/0304-419x(82)90020-8 · Cited by 560
Szabo, A., Dalmau, J., Manley, G., Rosenfeld, M., Wong, E., Henson, J., Posner, J. B., & Furneaux, H. M. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90184-z · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Hewitt, H. B., Blake, E. R., & Walder, A. S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1976-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-259
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2009209888
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critique of the evidence for active host defence against cancer, based on personal studies of 27 murine tumours of spontaneous origin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1976.37
- The paper
- Hewitt, H. B., Blake, E. R., & Walder, A. S. (1976). A critique of the evidence for active host defence against cancer, based on personal studies of 27 murine tumours of spontaneous origin. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1976.37
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.