The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intake of dairy products and the risk of breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
The relationship between intake of dairy products and risk of breast cancer was studied in 4697 initially cancer-free women, aged 15 years or over. During a 25 year follow-up period after the collection of food consumption data, 88 breast cancers were diagnosed. Intakes of foods were calculated from dietary history interviews covering the habitual diet of examinees over the preceding year. There was a significant inverse gradient between milk intake and incidence of breast cancer, the age-adjusted relative risk of breast cancer being 0.42 (95% confidence interval=0.24-0.74) between the highest and lowest tertiles of milk consumption. The associations with respect to other dairy products were not significant. Adjustment for potential confounding factors, i.e. smoking, body mass index, number of childbirths, occupation and geographic area, resulted in only a minor change in the milk intake-breast cancer relation. Nor did adjustment for intake of other foodstuffs and nutrients, e.g. energy, carbohydrates, protein, fat, vitamins and trace elements, alter the results. No significant interactions between milk intake and demographic or dietary variables or time of cancer diagnosis were observed. Our data suggest that there is a protective effect, dietary or habitual, associated with consumption of milk that overwhelms the associations between different other factors and risk of breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chin, S. F., Liu, W., Storkson, J. M., Ha, Y. L., & Pariza, M. W. (1992) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/0889-1575(92)90037-k · Cited by 1,197
A comparison of prospective and retrospective assessments of diet in the study of breast cancer
Giovannucci, E., stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Manson, J. E., Rosner, B. A., Longnecker, M., Speizer, F. E., & Willett, W. C. (1993) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116703 · Cited by 207 · cited 1×
“Potential bias of dietary data arising from case status may affect the results of case - control studies (Giovannucci et al., 1993).”
Background
Cited by
A review of fatty acid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef
Daley, C. A., Abbott, A., Doyle, P. S., Nader, G. A., & Larson, S. (2010) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-10 · Cited by 807
Dietary fatty acids and human health
Williams, C. M. (2000) · Annales de Zootechnie · doi:10.1051/animres:2000116 · Cited by 640
den Hartigh, L. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11020370 · Cited by 371
Implication of Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) in Human Health
Dilzer, A., & Park, Y. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2010.501409 · Cited by 375
The effect of conjugated linoleic acid on fat to lean repartitioning and feed conversion in pigs
Dugan, M. E. R., Aalhus, J. L., Schaefer, A. L., & Kramer, J. K. G. (1997) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/a97-084 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Knekt, P., Järvinen, R., Seppänen, R., Pukkala, E., & Aromaa, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 687-691
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W1970700515
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intake of dairy products and the risk of breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1996.119
- The paper
- Knekt, P., Järvinen, R., Seppänen, R., Pukkala, E., & Aromaa, A. (1996). Intake of dairy products and the risk of breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.