A review of fatty acid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef
Open accessAbstract
Growing consumer interest in grass-fed beef products has raised a number of questions with regard to the perceived differences in nutritional quality between grass-fed and grain-fed cattle. Research spanning three decades suggests that grass-based diets can significantly improve the fatty acid (FA) composition and antioxidant content of beef, albeit with variable impacts on overall palatability. Grass-based diets have been shown to enhance total conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) (C18:2) isomers, trans vaccenic acid (TVA) (C18:1 t11), a precursor to CLA, and omega-3 (n-3) FAs on a g/g fat basis. While the overall concentration of total SFAs is not different between feeding regimens, grass-finished beef tends toward a higher proportion of cholesterol neutral stearic FA (C18:0), and less cholesterol-elevating SFAs such as myristic (C14:0) and palmitic (C16:0) FAs. Several studies suggest that grass-based diets elevate precursors for Vitamin A and E, as well as cancer fighting antioxidants such as glutathione (GT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity as compared to grain-fed contemporaries. Fat conscious consumers will also prefer the overall lower fat content of a grass-fed beef product. However, consumers should be aware that the differences in FA content will also give grass-fed beef a distinct grass flavor and unique cooking qualities that should be considered when making the transition from grain-fed beef. In addition, the fat from grass-finished beef may have a yellowish appearance from the elevated carotenoid content (precursor to Vitamin A). It is also noted that grain-fed beef consumers may achieve similar intakes of both n-3 and CLA through the consumption of higher fat grain-fed portions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intake of yogurt, but not milk, is consistently associated with lower incidence of diabetes; cheese intake also associates with lower diabetes risk in several although not all studies.
“For example, intake of yogurt, but not milk, is consistently associated with lower incidence of diabetes; while intake of cheese, which has high calorie, fat, and saturated fat content, also associates with lower diabetes risk in several although not all studies.57, 179-184, 224, 226-228”
From Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review (2016) · cites this paper as [184]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Dietary fat intake and the risk of incident dementia in the Rotterdam study
Kalmijn, S., Launer, L. J., Ott, A., Witteman, J. C. M., Hofman, A., & Breteler, M. M. B. (1997) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410420514 · Cited by 895 · cited 1× · see citing works
“High consumption of omega-3 FAs is typically associated with a lower incidence of depression, a decreased prevalence of age-related memory loss and a lower risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease [45-51].”
BackgroundBioconversion of vaccenic acid to conjugated linoleic acid in humans
Turpeinen, A. M., Mutanen, M., Aro, A., Salminen, I., Basu, S., Palmquist, D. L., & Griinari, J. M. (2002) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.3.504 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mozaffarian, D. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.018585 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
“lute content (g per 100 g beef) can be the same, higher, or even lower because of decreased total fat content of the meat.(184,185)”
Clark, M., & Tilman, D. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5 · Cited by 989 · see citing works
den Hartigh, L. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11020370 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Dietary guidance from the international organization for the study of inflammatory bowel diseases
Levine, A., Rhodes, J. M., Lindsay, J. O., Abreu, M. T., Kamm, M. A., Gibson, P. R., Gasche, C., Silverberg, M. S., Mahadevan, U., Boneh, R. S., et al. (2020) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.046 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Van Elswyk, M. E., & McNeill, S. H. (2014) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.010 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Van Vliet, S., Beals, J. W., Martinez, I. G., Skinner, S. K., & Burd, N. A. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10020224 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Chapter 13: Diet and periodontal diseases
Woelber, J. P., & Tennert, C. (2020) · Monographs in Oral Science · doi:10.1159/000455380 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Bjorklund, E. A., Heins, B. J., DiCostanzo, A., & Chester-Jones, H. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-6984 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Unified theory of Alzheimer’s disease (UTAD): implications for prevention and curative therapy
Nehls, M. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s40303-016-0018-8 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
DARWISH, W. S., IKENAKA, Y., MORSHDY, A. E., ELDESOKY, K. I., NAKAYAMA, S., MIZUKAWA, H., & ISHIZUKA, M. (2016) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Science · doi:10.1292/jvms.15-0287 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Daley, C. A., Abbott, A., Doyle, P. S., Nader, G. A., & Larson, S.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Chico (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Daley, Cynthia A
- Venue
- Nutrition Journal
- Published
- 2010-03-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-10
- ISSN
- 1475-2891 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2846864
- OpenAlex
- W2166531963
- Cited by
- 807
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nutrition Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Keywords
- grass-fed beef, grain-fed beef, fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid, trans-vaccenic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, stearic acid, vitamin A, vitamin E, antioxidants, glutathione, superoxide dismutase, carotenoids, beef palatability, cooking quality, dietary fat intake
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Antioxidants, Cattle, Edible Grain, Fatty Acids, Poaceae, Meat, Oleic Acids, Taste, Vitamin E, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, beta Carotene, Fatty Acids, Omega-6, Linoleic Acids, Conjugated
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review