Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy

Open access
Mir, LM, Glass, LF, Serša, G, Teissié, J, Domenge, C, Miklavčič, D, Jaroszeski, MJ, Orlowski, S, Reintgen, DS, Rudolf, Z, Belehradek, M, Gilbert, R, Rols, MP, Belehradek, J, Bachaud, JM, DeConti, R, Štabuc, B, Čemažar, M, Coninx, P, Heller, R·1998·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) enhances the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents by administering the drug in combination with short intense electric pulses. ECT is effective because electric pulses permeabilize tumour cell membranes and allow non-permeant drugs, such as bleomycin, to enter the cells. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the anti-tumour effectiveness of ECT with bleomycin on cutaneous and subcutaneous tumours. This article summarizes results obtained in independent clinical trials performed by five cancer centres. A total of 291 cutaneous or subcutaneous tumours of basal cell carcinoma (32), malignant melanoma (142), adenocarcinoma (30) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (87) were treated in 50 patients. Short and intense electric pulses were applied to tumours percutaneously after intravenous or intratumour administration of bleomycin. The tumours were measured and the response to the treatment evaluated 30 days after the treatment. Objective responses were obtained in 233 (85.3%) of the 273 evaluable tumours that were treated with ECT. Clinical complete responses were achieved in 154 (56.4%) tumours, and partial responses were observed in 79 (28.9%) tumours. The application of electric pulses to the patients was safe and well tolerated. An instantaneous contraction of the underlying muscles was noticed. Minimal adverse side-effects were observed. ECT was shown to be an effective local treatment. ECT was effective regardless of the histological type of the tumour. Therefore, ECT offers an approach to the treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous tumours in patients with minimal adverse side-effects and with a high response rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.1998.388

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Mir, L., Glass, L., Serša, G., Teissié, J., Domenge, C., Miklavčič, D., Jaroszeski, M., Orlowski, S., Reintgen, D., Rudolf, Z., Belehradek, M., Gilbert, R., Rols, M., Belehradek, J., Bachaud, J., DeConti, R., Štabuc, B., Čemažar, M., Coninx, P., & Heller, R.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1998-06
Volume
77
Issue
12
Pages
2336-2342
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2111409695
Cited by
444
References
22
FWCI
14.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1998.388
The paper
Mir, L., Glass, L., Serša, G., Teissié, J., Domenge, C., Miklavčič, D., Jaroszeski, M., Orlowski, S., Reintgen, D., Rudolf, Z., Belehradek, M., Gilbert, R., Rols, M., Belehradek, J., Bachaud, J., DeConti, R., Štabuc, B., Čemažar, M., Coninx, P., & Heller, R. (1998). Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1998.388

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.