Cited by 70Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

iTRAQ reveals candidate pancreatic cancer serum biomarkers: influence of obstructive jaundice on their performance

Open access
Tonack, S, Jenkinson, C, Cox, T, Elliott, V, Jenkins, R E, Kitteringham, N R, Greenhalf, W, Shaw, V +4 more·2013·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of our study were to identify serum biomarkers that distinguish pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC) patients from benign pancreatic disease patients and healthy subjects, and to assess the effects of jaundice on biomarker performance. METHODS: Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification were used to compare pooled serum and pancreatic juice samples from a test set of 59 and 25 subjects, respectively. Validation was undertaken in 113 independent subjects. RESULTS: Candidate proteins Complement C5, inter-α-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H3, α1-β glycoprotein and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor were elevated in cancer, as were the reference markers CA19-9 and Reg3A. Biliary obstruction had a significant effect on the performance of the markers, in particular within the PDAC group where the presence of jaundice was associated with a significant increase in the levels of all six proteins (P<0.01). Consequently, in the absence of jaundice, proteins showed reduced sensitivity for PDAC patients over benign subjects and healthy controls (HCs). Similarly, in the presence of jaundice, markers showed reduced specificity for PDAC patients over benign subjects with jaundice. Combining markers enabled improved sensitivity for non-jaundiced PDAC patients over HCs and improved specificity for jaundiced PDAC patients over jaundiced benign disease subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The presence-absence of jaundice in the clinical scenario severely impacts the performance of biomarkers for PDAC diagnosis and has implications for their clinical translation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.2013.150

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Awareness is increasing that obstructive jaundice can lead to false-positive biomarker findings.

    “Moreover, awareness that the presence of obstructive jaundice can lead to false-positive biomarker findings is increasing.69–71”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [70]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tonack, S., Jenkinson, C., Cox, T., Elliott, V, Jenkins, R. E., Kitteringham, N. R., Greenhalf, W., Shaw, V, Michalski, C. W., Friess, H., Neoptolemos, J. P., & Costello, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Costello, E
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2013-04-11
Volume
108
Issue
9
Pages
1846-1853
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2092846476
Cited by
70
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (16812, A12790, 15957)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10126)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, serum biomarkers, obstructive jaundice, biliary obstruction, complement C5, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor, REG3A, CA19-9, pancreatic juice, sensitivity and specificity, combined biomarker detection
MeSH terms
Pancreatitis-Associated Proteins, Aged, Alpha-Globulins, Antigens, Neoplasm, Complement C5, Female, Glycoproteins, Humans, Immunoglobulins, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Juice, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, CA-19-9 Antigen, Receptors, Polymeric Immunoglobulin, Lectins, C-Type, Jaundice, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review