Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes predict for outcome in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer

Open access
Ward, M J, Thirdborough, S M, Mellows, T, Riley, C, Harris, S, Suchak, K, Webb, A, Hampton, C, Patel, N N, Randall, C J, Cox, H J, Jogai, S, Primrose, J, Piper, K, Ottensmeier, C H, King, E V, Thomas, G J·2014·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC) is associated with improved survival compared with HPV-negative disease. However, a minority of HPV-positive patients have poor prognosis. Currently, there is no generally accepted strategy for identifying these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 270 consecutively treated OPSCC patients from three centres for effects of clinical, pathological, immunological, and molecular features on disease mortality. We used Cox regression to examine associations between factors and OPSCC death, and developed a prognostic model for 3-year mortality using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with HPV-positive tumours showed improved survival (hazard ratio (HR), 0.33 (0.21-0.53)). High levels of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) stratified HPV-positive patients into high-risk and low-risk groups (3-year survival; HPV-positive/TIL(high)=96%, HPV-positive/TIL(low)=59%). Survival of HPV-positive/TIL(low) patients did not differ from HPV-negative patients (HR, 1.01; P=0.98). We developed a prognostic model for HPV-positive tumours using a 'training' cohort from one centre; the combination of TIL levels, heavy smoking, and T-stage were significant (AUROC=0·87). This model was validated on patients from the other centres (detection rate 67%; false-positive rate 5.6%; AUROC=0·82). INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that an immune response, reflected by TIL levels in the primary tumour, has an important role in the improved survival seen in most HPV-positive patients, and is relevant for the clinical evaluation of HPV-positive OPSCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.2013.639

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Ward, M. J., Thirdborough, S. M., Mellows, T., Riley, C., Harris, S., Suchak, K., Webb, A., Hampton, C., Patel, N. N., Randall, C. J., Cox, H. J., Jogai, S., Primrose, J., Piper, K., Ottensmeier, C. H., King, E. V., & Thomas, G. J.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2013-10-29
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
489-500
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2061572018
Cited by
391
References
36
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes predict for outcome in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.2013.639
The paper
Ward, M. J., Thirdborough, S. M., Mellows, T., Riley, C., Harris, S., Suchak, K., Webb, A., Hampton, C., Patel, N. N., Randall, C. J., Cox, H. J., Jogai, S., Primrose, J., Piper, K., Ottensmeier, C. H., King, E. V., & Thomas, G. J. (2014). Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes predict for outcome in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.639

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.