Cited by 106Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vaginal self-sampling is a cost-effective way to increase participation in a cervical cancer screening programme: a randomised trial

Open access

Haguenoer, K, Sengchanh, S, Gaudy-Graffin, C, Boyard, J, Fontenay, R, Marret, H, Goudeau, A, Pigneaux de Laroche, N, Rusch, E, Giraudeau, B·2014·British Journal of Cancer

DOI 10.1038/bjc.2014.510PMC PMC4260034

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening coverage remains insufficient in most countries. Our objective was to assess whether in-home vaginal self-sampling with a dry swab for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing is effective and cost-effective in increasing participation in cervical cancer screening. METHODS: In March 2012, 6000 unscreened women aged 30-65 years, living in a French region covered by a screening programme, who had not responded to an initial invitation to have a Pap smear were equally randomised to three groups: 'no intervention'; 'recall', women received a letter to have a Pap smear; and 'self-sampling', women received a self-sampling kit to return to a centralised virology laboratory for PCR-based HPV testing. RESULTS: Participation was higher in the 'self-sampling' than in the 'no intervention' group (22.5% vs 9.9%, P<0.0001; OR 2.64) and 'recall' group (11.7%, P<0.0001; OR 2.20). In the 'self-sampling' group, 320 used the self-sampling kit; for 44 of these women with positive HR-HPV test results, 40 had the recommended triage Pap smear. The ICER per extra screened woman was 77.8[euro ] and 63.2[euro ] for the 'recall' and 'self-sampling' groups, respectively, relative to the 'no intervention' group. CONCLUSIONS: Offering an in-home, return-mail kit for vaginal self-sampling with a dry swab is more effective and cost-effective than a recall letter in increasing participation in cervical cancer screening.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.2014.510

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008
Ferlay, J., Shin, H., Bray, F., Forman, D., Mathers, C. D., & Parkin, D. M. (2010) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.25516 · Cited by 21,468
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548
Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer
Muñoz, N., Bosch, F. X., de Sanjosé, S., Herrero, R., Castellsagué, X., Shah, K. V., Snijders, P. J. F., & Meijer, C. J. L. M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021641 · Cited by 6,249
The 2001 Bethesda System<SUBTITLE>Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology</SUBTITLE>
Solomon, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2114 · Cited by 3,104
Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration
Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT Group* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008 · Cited by 2,292
Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: low average levels and large inequalities
Gakidou, E., Nordhagen, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050132 · Cited by 976
Evidence Regarding Human Papillomavirus Testing in Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer
Arbyn, M., Ronco, G., Anttila, A., Meijer, C. J. L. M., Poljak, M., Ogilvie, G., Koliopoulos, G., Naucler, P., Sankaranarayanan, R., & Peto, J. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095 · Cited by 897
The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology
Solomon, D., Davey, D. D., Kurman, R. J., Moriarty, A. T., O’Connor, D., Prey, M. U., Raab, S. S., Sherman, M. E., Wilbur, D. C., & Wright, T. (2002) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/00006254-200208000-00015 · Cited by 822
European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second Edition—Summary Document
Arbyn, M., Anttila, A., Jordan, J. A., Ronco, G., Schenck, U., Segnan, N., Wiener, H., Herbert, A., & von Karsa, L. (2010) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp471 · Cited by 762
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis
Arbyn, M., Verdoodt, F., Snijders, P. J. F., Verhoef, V. M. J., Suonio, E., Dillner, L., Minozzi, S., Bellisario, C., Banzi, R., Zhao, F.-H., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70570-9 · Cited by 674

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Duport N, Salines E, Grémy I (2014) [First results of the experimental evaluation of the French organized cervical cancer screening program, 2010–2012]. Bull Epidémiol Hebd 13-14-15: 228–234.

Sorted by citations

Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses
Arbyn, M., Smith, S. B., Temin, S., Sultana, F., & Castle, P. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4823 · Cited by 851
Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yeh, P. T., Kennedy, C. E., Vuyst, H. D., & Narasimhan, M. (2019) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001351 · Cited by 348
Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
Verdoodt, F., Jentschke, M., Hillemanns, P., Racey, C. S., Snijders, P. J. F., & Arbyn, M. (2015) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.006 · Cited by 275
Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Musa, J., Achenbach, C. J., O’Dwyer, L. C., Evans, C. T., McHugh, M., Hou, L., Simon, M. A., Murphy, R. L., & Jordan, N. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183924 · Cited by 223
Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services
Duffy, S. W., Myles, J. P., Maroni, R., & Mohammad, A. (2016) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/0969141316664757 · Cited by 165
Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Increased Cervical Cancer Screening Participation and Incorporation in International Screening Programs
Gupta, S., Palmer, C., Bik, E. M., Cárdenas, J. P., Núñez, H., Kraal, L., Bird, S. W., Bowers, J., Smith, A. J., Walton, N. A., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00077 · Cited by 163
Offering HPV self-sampling kits: an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening
Costa, S., Verberckmoes, B., Castle, P. E., & Arbyn, M. (2023) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-022-02094-w · Cited by 139
Molecular Detection Methods in HPV-Related Cancers
Williams, J., Kostiuk, M. A., & Biron, V. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.864820 · Cited by 125
Cost-effectiveness studies of HPV self-sampling: A systematic review
Malone, C., Barnabas, R. V., Buist, D. S. M., Tiro, J. A., & Winer, R. L. (2020) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105953 · Cited by 106
Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences Among Trans-Masculine Individuals: Patient-Collected Human Papillomavirus Vaginal Swabs Versus Provider-Administered Pap Tests
McDowell, M. J., Pardee, D. J., Peitzmeier, S. M., Reisner, S. L., Agénor, M., Alizaga, N. M., Bernstein, I. M., & Potter, J. E. (2017) · LGBT Health · doi:10.1089/lgbt.2016.0187 · Cited by 102
Understanding Transgender Men's Experiences with and Preferences for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Rapid Assessment Survey
Seay, J., Ranck, A., Weiss, R. E., Salgado, C. J., Fein, L. A., & Kobetz, E. K. (2017) · LGBT Health · doi:10.1089/lgbt.2016.0143 · Cited by 88
Self care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights: costs, benefits, and financing
Remme, M., Narasimhan, M., Wilson, D. P., Ali, M., Vijayasingham, L., Ghani, F., & Allotey, P. A. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l1228 · Cited by 79
Cervical cancer screening in a low‐resource setting: a pilot study on an HPV‐based screen‐and‐treat approach
Kunckler, M., Schumacher, F., Kenfack, B., Catarino, R., Viviano, M., Tincho, E., Tebeu, P. M., Temogne, L., Vassilakos, P., & Petignat, P. (2017) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.1089 · Cited by 80
Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials
Gennaro, G. D., Licata, F., Trovato, A., & Bianco, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003461 · Cited by 73
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening
Staley, H., Shiraz, A., Shreeve, N., Bryant, A., Martin‐Hirsch, P. L., & Gajjar, K. B. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002834.pub3 · Cited by 61
Attitudes and factors affecting acceptability of self-administered cervicovaginal sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping as an alternative to Pap testing among multiethnic Malaysian women
Ma'som, M., Bhoo‐Pathy, N., Nasir, N. H., Bellinson, J., Subramaniam, S., Ma, Y., Yap, S. H., Goh, P., Gravitt, P. E., & Woo, Y. L. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-011022 · Cited by 61
A Randomized Comparison of Different Vaginal Self-sampling Devices and Urine for Human Papillomavirus Testing—Predictors 5.1
Cadman, L., Reuter, C., Jitlal, M., Kleeman, M., Austin, J., Hollingworth, T., Parberry, A. L., Ashdown-Barr, L., Patel, D., Nedjai, B., et al. (2021) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1226 · Cited by 60
Acceptability and feasibility of human papilloma virus self-sampling for cervical cancer screening
Ilangovan, K., Kobetz, E., Koru-Sengul, T., Marcus, E. N., Rodriguez, B., Alonzo, Y., & Carrasquillo, O. (2016) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2015.5469 · Cited by 56
A non-invasive tool for detecting cervical cancer odor by trained scent dogs
Guerrero-Flores, H., Apresa-García, T., Garay, Ó., Sánchez-Pérez, A., Flores-Villegas, D., Bandera-Calderón, A., García-Palacios, R., Rojas-Sánchez, T. M. D. R., Romero-Morelos, P., Sánchez-Albor, V., et al. (2017) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2996-4 · Cited by 56
Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection With Papanicolaou Test Referral for Infrequently Screened Women in the United States
Smith, J. S., Marais, A. C. D., Deal, A. M., Richman, A. R., Perez‐Heydrich, C., Yen‐Lieberman, B., Barclay, L. B., Belinson, J. L., Rinas, A., & Brewer, N. T. (2017) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/olq.0000000000000681 · Cited by 55
Feasibility of a community‐based cervical cancer screening with “test and treat” strategy using self‐sample for an HPV test: Experience from rural Cameroon, Africa
Domgue, J. F., Futuh, B., Ngalla, C., Kakute, P., Manjuh, F., Manga, S. M., Nulah, K. L., Welty, E. R., Schmeler, K. M., & Welty, T. (2019) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.32746 · Cited by 54
Tracking vaginal, anal and oral infection in a mouse papillomavirus infection model
Hu, J., Budgeon, L. R., Cladel, N. M., Balogh, K. K., Myers, R. L., Cooper, T. K., & Christensen, N. D. (2015) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/jgv.0.000295 · Cited by 48
A randomized, controlled trial of two strategies of offering the home‐based HPV self‐sampling test to non‐ participants in the Flemish cervical cancer screening program
Kellen, E., Benoy, I., Vanden Broeck, D., Martens, P., Bogers, J., Haelens, A., & Van Limbergen, E. (2018) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.31391 · Cited by 48
Evaluation of satisfaction with three different cervical cancer screening modalities: clinician-collected Pap test vs. HPV test by self-sampling vs. HPV test by urine sampling
Shin, H. Y., Lee, B., Hwang, S., Lee, D. O., Sung, N. Y., Park, J. Y., & Jun, J. K. (2019) · Journal of Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e76 · Cited by 49
Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study
Aarnio, R., Östensson, E., Olovsson, M., Gustavsson, I. M., & Gyllensten, U. B. (2020) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07085-9 · Cited by 48
Randomised study shows that repeated self-sampling and HPV test has more than two-fold higher detection rate of women with CIN2+ histology than Pap smear cytology
Gustavsson, I. M., Aarnio, R., Berggrund, M., Hedlund‐Lindberg, J., Strand, A.-S., Sanner, K., Wikström, I., Enroth, S., Olovsson, M., & Gyllensten, U. B. (2018) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.485 · Cited by 42
Offering self-sampling to cervical screening non-attenders in primary care
Lim, A. W., Hollingworth, A., Kalwij, S., Curran, G., & Sasieni, P. D. (2016) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/0969141316639346 · Cited by 33
Women's Attitudes Toward Cervicovaginal Self-Sampling for High-Risk HPV Infection on the US-Mexico Border
Peñaranda, E., Molokwu, J., Flores, S., Byrd, T. L., Brown, L. D., & Shokar, N. K. (2015) · Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease · doi:10.1097/lgt.0000000000000134 · Cited by 31
Self-Collection for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Safety-Net Setting
Montealegre, J. R., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Bulsara, S., Parker, S., Amboree, T. L., Anderson, M. L., Daheri, M., Jibaja‐Weiss, M. L., Schmeler, K. M., Deshmukh, A. A., et al. (2025) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2971 · Cited by 35
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of HPV self-testing offered to non-attendees in cervical cancer screening in Switzerland
Vassilakos, P., Poncet, A., Catarino, R., Viviano, M., Petignat, P., & Combescure, C. (2019) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.021 · Cited by 29
Efficacy of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening: GPs offering self-sampling kits for HPV testing versus recommendations to have a pap smear taken - A randomised controlled trial
Peeters, E., Cornet, K., Devroey, D., & Arbyn, M. (2020) · Papillomavirus Research · doi:10.1016/j.pvr.2020.100194 · Cited by 27
Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania
Paulauskienė, J., Ivanaūskienė, R., Skrodenienė, E., & Petkevičienė, J. (2019) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina55090570 · Cited by 26
Organised screening for cervical cancer in France: a cost-effectiveness assessment
Barré, S., Massetti, M., Leleu, H., & BELS, F. D. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014626 · Cited by 24
Self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: A scoping review
Colonetti, T., Uggioni, M. L. R., dos Santos, A. L. M., Uggioni, N. M., Elibio, L. U., Balbinot, E. L., Grande, A. J., & da Rosa, M. I. (2024) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.032 · Cited by 32
Acceptability of Self-Sample Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Thai Women Visiting a Colposcopy Clinic
Phoolcharoen, N., Kantathavorn, N., Krisorakun, W., Taepisitpong, C., Krongthong, W., & Saeloo, S. (2018) · Journal of Community Health · doi:10.1007/s10900-017-0460-2 · Cited by 24
Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women’s own preferred test method into account—A Swedish randomised controlled trial
Lilliecreutz, C., Karlsson, H., & Holm, A. S. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235202 · Cited by 24
Citizen science as an instrument for women’s health research
Ahannach, S., Hoyweghen, I. V., Verhoeven, V., & Lebeer, S. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03371-2 · Cited by 18
Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening
Meenan, R. T., Troja, C., Buist, D. S. M., Tiro, J. A., Lin, J. W., Anderson, M. L., Gao, H., Green, B. B., & Winer, R. L. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4052 · Cited by 20
Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program
Tranberg, M., Bech, B. H., Blaakær, J., Jensen, J. S., Svanholm, H., & Andersen, B. S. (2016) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2859-z · Cited by 20
The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland
Virtanen, A., Anttila, A., & Nieminen, P. (2015) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-015-0261-7 · Cited by 19
The Vaginal Immunoproteome for the Prediction of Spontaneous Preterm Birth
Shaffer, Z., Romero, R. J., Tarca, A. L., Galaz, J., Arenas‐Hernandez, M., Gudicha, D. W., Chaiworapongsa, T., Jung, E., Suksai, M., Gotsch, F., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.90943 · Cited by 19
Comparison of the performance of paired urine and cervical samples for cervical cancer screening in screening population
Xu, H., Yu, Y., George, W., Smith, J. S., Hu, S., Dang, L., Zhang, X., Pan, Q., Qiao, Y., & Zhao, F. (2019) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.25597 · Cited by 17
Durability of clinical performance afforded by self-collected HPV testing: A 15-year cohort study in China
Zhang, L., Xu, X., Hu, S., Chen, F., Zhang, X., Pan, Q., Zhang, W., Feng, R., Dong, L., Zhang, Q., et al. (2018) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.012 · Cited by 15
Cervical precancer screening using self-sampling, HPV DNA testing, and mobile colposcopy in a hard-to-reach community in Ghana: a pilot study
Effah, K., Tekpor, E., Wormenor, C. M., Allotey, J., Owusu–Agyeman, Y., Kemawor, S., Agyiri, D., Amenu, J., Gmanyami, J. M., Adjuik, M., et al. (2024) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-024-13113-9 · Cited by 14
Effect of Educational Intervention on Self-Sampling Acceptability and Follow-Up Paps in Border Dwelling Hispanic Females
Molokwu, J., Peñaranda, E., Dwivedi, A. K., Mallawaarachchi, I. V., & Shokar, N. K. (2018) · Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease · doi:10.1097/lgt.0000000000000424 · Cited by 14
Cervical cancer is not just a young woman's disease
Sherman, S. M., Castañón, A., Moss, E. L., & Redman, C. W. E. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h2729 · Cited by 14
Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists
Raginel, T., Grandazzi, G., Launoy, G. D., Trocmé, M., Christophe, V., Berchi, C., & Guittet, L. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05479-w · Cited by 13
Acceptability of self-sampling human papillomavirus test for cervical cancer screening in Japan: A questionnaire survey in the ACCESS trial
Fujita, M., Nagashima, K., Shimazu, M., Suzuki, M., Tauchi, I., Sakuma, M., Yamamoto, S., Hanaoka, H., Shozu, M., Tsuruoka, N., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286909 · Cited by 15
Screening for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer: systematic reviews to inform an update to recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
Pillay, J., Gates, A., Guitard, S., Zakher, B., Sim, S., Vandermeer, B. W., & Hartling, L. (2025) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-025-02866-4 · Cited by 14
Rationale and design of the Prevent Anal Cancer Self-Swab Study: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial of home-based self-collection of cells for anal cancer screening
Nyitray, A. G., Schick, V., Swartz, M. D., Giuliano, A. R., Fernández, M. E., Deshmukh, A. A., Ridolfi, T. J., Ajala, C., Brzezinski, B., Sandoval, M. N., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051118 · Cited by 12
Study Protocol: Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Strategies Involving Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening
Lefeuvre, C., Pauw, H. D., Banaszuk, A.-S., Pivert, A., Ducancelle, A., Rexand-Galais, F., & Arbyn, M. (2022) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.3389/ijph.2022.1604284 · Cited by 12
Persistent disparities of cervical cancer among American Indians/Alaska natives: Are we maximizing prevention tools?
Bruegl, A. S., Emerson, J. B., & Tirumala, K. S. (2022) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.007 · Cited by 12
The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania
Paulauskienė, J., Štelemėkas, M., Ivanaūskienė, R., & Petkevičienė, J. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16245035 · Cited by 12
Acceptability of vaginal self-sampling with high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: a French questionnaire-based study
Bertucci, M., Bonnet, E., Satger, L., Kreiche, A., Chappert, J.-L., Loy-Morel, S., Segondy, M., Daurès, J. P., & Boulle, N. (2020) · Women & Health · doi:10.1080/03630242.2020.1831683 · Cited by 12
Implementation of a self-sampling HPV test for non-responders to cervical cancer screening in Japan: secondary analysis of the ACCESS trial
Fujita, M., Nagashima, K., Shimazu, M., Suzuki, M., Tauchi, I., Sakuma, M., Yamamoto, S., Hanaoka, H., Shozu, M., Tsuruoka, N., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18800-w · Cited by 10
Impact of postal correspondence letters on participation in cancer screening: a rapid review
Yakubu, M., Meggetto, O., Lai, Y., Peirson, L., Walker, M. J., & Lofters, A. (2020) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106404 · Cited by 10
The cost-effectiveness of opt-in and send-to-all HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: The Equalscreen randomized controlled trial
Knauss, T., Hansen, B. T., Pedersen, K., Aasbø, G., Kunst, N., & Burger, E. A. (2022) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.10.027 · Cited by 10
Prevention and control of HPV and HPV-related cancers in France: the evolving landscape and the way forward – a meeting report
Waheed, D.-E.-N., Weil-Olivier, C., Riethmuller, D., Franco, E. L., Prétet, J., Baay, M. F. D., Muñóz, N., & Vorsters, A. (2023) · BMC Proceedings · doi:10.1186/s12919-023-00271-0 · Cited by 10
Agreement of self- and physician-collected samples for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus infections in women attending a colposcopy clinic in Thailand
Phoolcharoen, N., Kantathavorn, N., Krisorakun, W., Sricharunrat, T., Teerayathanakul, N., Taepisitpong, C., Sornsamdang, G., Krongthong, W., & Saeloo, S. (2018) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-018-3241-9 · Cited by 10
Design and Validation of a Chatbot-Based Cervical Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women Experiencing Socioeconomic Disadvantage: User-Centered Approach Study
Bonniec, A. L., Sauvaget, C., Lucas, E., Nassiri, A., & Selmouni, F. (2025) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/70251 · Cited by 9
Evolving HPV diagnostics: current practice and future frontiers
Shi, L., Chen, H., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Ren, W., & Huang, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1681779 · Cited by 13
Cost-Effectiveness of HPV Self-Testing Options for Cervical Cancer Screening
Meenan, R. T., Lacey, C., Buist, D. S. M., Tiro, J. A., Lin, J. W., Anderson, M. L., Green, B. B., & Winer, R. L. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34960 · Cited by 8
A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase cervical cancer screening among underserved women in Europe
Sun, L. J., Patel, S., Fiorina, C., Glass, A., Rochaix, L., Bardou, M., Andersen, B. S., Kirkegaard, P., Bøje, R. B., Tranberg, M., et al. (2023) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-023-01627-1 · Cited by 9
Evaluation of self-sampling-based cervical cancer screening strategy using HPV Selfy CE-IVD test coupled with home-collection kit: a clinical study in Italy
Feltri, G., Valenti, G., Isidoro, E., Kaur, J., Treleani, M., Bartelloni, A., Mauro, C., Spiga, F., Ticich, G., Napoli, M. D., et al. (2023) · European journal of medical research · doi:10.1186/s40001-023-01263-8 · Cited by 9
Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Decision-making to Improve Vulnerable Women’s Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in France: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (AppDate-You)
Selmouni, F., Guy, M., Muwonge, R., Nassiri, A., Lucas, E., Basu, P. S., & Sauvaget, C. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/39288 · Cited by 8
High Rate of β-Globin DNA Detection Validates Self-Sampling in Herpes Simplex Virus Shedding Studies
Mujugira, A., Huang, M.-L. W., Selke, S., Drolette, L. M., Magaret, A., & Wald, A. (2015) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/olq.0000000000000374 · Cited by 7
Assessment of HPV screening modalities within primary care: a systematic review
Waly, Y. M., Sharafeldin, A.-B. K., Al‐Majmuei, A., Alatoom, M., Fredericks, S., & Aloia, A.-A. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1567509 · Cited by 7
Combined incentive actions, focusing on primary care professionals, to improve cervical cancer screening in women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged geographical areas: a study protocol of a hybrid cluster randomised effectiveness and implementation trial- RESISTE
Hassine, A., Antoni, G., Fender, M., Slama, K., Léandri, F.-X., Fanon, J., Auvray, C., Jaffar‐Bandjee, M., Traversier, N., Fagour, L., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065952 · Cited by 6
HPV self-collection: what are we waiting for? Exploration of attitudes from frontline healthcare providers
Bohn, J. A., Fitch, K. C., Currier, J. J., & Bruegl, A. S. (2022) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2022-003860 · Cited by 6
Self-collection for primary HPV screening using dry swabs: a review of clinical performance, laboratory considerations, and patient preferences
Howard, M. F., Fyffe-Freil, R., Pierre, C. C., Maku, H. O., Costanzo, S. D., Lorey, T. S., & Greene, D. N. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00767-24 · Cited by 5
Self‐collected vaginal HPV samples for long‐term non‐attendees in the Swedish organized cervical cancer screening program
Sundqvist, A., Hellsten, C., Strander, B., Lindh, M., & Borgfeldt, C. (2025) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.15112 · Cited by 5
Patterns of gynaecological check-up and their association with body mass index within the CONSTANCES cohort
Franck, J.-E., Ringa, V., Rigal, L., Sassenou, J., Cœuret-Pellicer, M., Chauvin, P., & Menvielle, G. (2020) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/0969141320914323 · Cited by 5
Study protocol of the ACCESS trial: a randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing by self-sampling in cervical cancer screening uptake and precancer detection
Fujita, M., Shimazu, M., Nagashima, K., Suzuki, M., Tauchi, I., Sakuma, M., Yamamoto, S., Shozu, M., Hanaoka, H., Tsuruoka, N., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049803 · Cited by 5
Development of a Point-of-Care Cervico-Vaginal Sampling/Testing Device for the Colorimetric Detection of Cervical Cancer
Appidi, T., Vakada, M., Buddhiraju, H. S., Chinchulkar, S. A., Kota, A., Yadav, D. N., Kodandapani, S., Simhabhatla, S. K., & Rengan, A. K. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13081382 · Cited by 4
Mammalian Species-Specific Resistance to Mammary Cancer
Barash, I. (2025) · Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia · doi:10.1007/s10911-025-09578-4 · Cited by 4
High Prevalence of Cervical High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Harboring Atypical Genotypes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus -Infected and -Uninfected First-Generation Adult Immigrant Women Originating from Sub-Saharan Africa and Living in France
Bouassa, R. M., Gubavu, C., Veyer, D. L., Robin, L., Gravier, A., Hocqueloux, L., Prazuck, T., Péré, H., Bélec, L., for the ANRS ImmiPap Study Group, et al. (2020) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-020-01074-7 · Cited by 6
A Home-Mailed Versus General Practitioner-Delivered Vaginal Self-Sampling Kit for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial with a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Boyard, J., Caille, A., Brunet-Houdard, S., Sengchanh, S., Giraudeau, B., Marret, H., Rolland-Lozachmeur, G., Rüsch, E., Gaudy‐Graffin, C., & Haguenoer, K. (2022) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2021.0597 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Effectiveness of self‐sampling human papillomavirus test on precancer detection and screening uptake in Japan : The ACCESS randomized controlled trial
Fujita, M., Nagashima, K., Shimazu, M., Suzuki, M., Tauchi, I., Sakuma, M., Yamamoto, S., Hanaoka, H., Shozu, M., Tsuruoka, N., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.34970 · Cited by 8
Monitoring mouse papillomavirus-associated cancer development using longitudinal Pap smear screening
Atkins, H., Uslu, A. A., Li, J. J., Shearer, D. A., Brendle, S. A., Han, C., Kozak, M., Lopez, P. G., Nayar, D., Balogh, K. K., et al. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01420-24 · Cited by 4
Evaluation of two alternative non-alcohol-based media for the suspension of self-collected vaginal swabs for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening
Giubbi, C., Martinelli, M., Meo, M. L. D., Njoku, R. C., Perdoni, F., Fruscio, R., Landoni, F., & Cocuzza, C. E. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31032 · Cited by 4
Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-collection and the role of telehealth: a prospective, randomized study stratified by menopausal status
Fitch, K. C., Bohn, J. A., Emerson, J. B., Boniface, E. R., & Bruegl, A. S. (2023) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2023-004935 · Cited by 3
National organization of uterine cervical cancer screening and social inequality in France
Raginel, T., Mil, R. D., Garnier, A., Launoy, G. D., & Guittet, L. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/cej.0000000000000557 · Cited by 3
Acceptance of Self-Sampling by Women Not Regularly Participating in Cervical Cancer Screening in Areas with Low Medical Density: A Qualitative Study within the French CapU4 Trial
Goff, J. L., Duc-Banaszuk, A.-S. L., Lefeuvre, C., Pivert, A., Ducancelle, A., Pauw, H. D., Arbyn, M., Vinay, A., & Rexand-Galais, F. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16112066 · Cited by 6
Could Urine Testing Be the Future of Cervical Cancer Screening?
Pathak, N., Dodds, J. P., & Zamora, J. (2015) · Women s Health · doi:10.2217/whe.15.21 · Cited by 3
Screening for atrial fibrillation with or without general practice involvement: a controlled study
Modi, R. N., Massou, E., Charlton, P. H., Dymond, A., Williams, K. M., Brimicombe, J. D., Freedman, B., Griffin, S. J., Hobbs, R. F., Lip, G. Y. H., et al. (2025) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-02878-y · Cited by 2
HPV-DNA testing from self-sampled menstrual blood using M-strip: A proof-of-concept study on feasibility & acceptance of a novel biosampling method
Chandra, S., Patel, M. V., Shah, K., & Trivedi, K. (2025) · The Indian Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.25259/ijmr_1770_2024 · Cited by 2
The Use of Self-Sampling Devices via a Smartphone Application to Encourage Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study
Plotti, F., Ficarola, F., Fais, G., Nardone, C. D. C., Montera, R., Luvero, D., Cundari, G. B., Avian, A., Riva, E., Castriciano, S., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14155569 · Cited by 2
An outreach strategy to increase uptake of vaginal self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in older French women: The RIDECA interventional research protocol
Lareyre, O., Mollevi, C., Broc, G., Caspar, M.-N., Pehlivanska, G., Boyer, H., Groc, S., Corradi, G., Loy-Morel, S., Guy, M., et al. (2024) · Women s Health · doi:10.1177/17455057241292693 · Cited by 1
Cost-Effectiveness of Home-Based Self-Sampling vs Clinician Sampling for Anal Precancer Screening
Damgacioglu, H., McAuliffe, T. L., Ridolfi, T. J., Chiao, E. Y., Fernández, M. E., Schick, V., Smith, J. S., Brzezinski, B., Nitkowski, J., Deshmukh, A. A., et al. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.52220 · Cited by 1
Cost-effectiveness studies evaluating HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening – a systematic review
Hallsson, L. R., Hoflacher, A.-M., Stratil, J. M., Muehler, M., Koch, L., John, E., Hillemanns, P., Jentschke, M., Siebert, U., & Sroczynski, G. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14409-1 · Cited by 1
Implementation of HPV Self-sampling in Cervical Screening Programs Increases Participation Rates: A Literature Review
Schmeink, C. E., & Bekkers, R. L. M. (2021) · Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1007/s40944-021-00539-3 · Cited by 1
Improving attendance to cervical cancer screening: Effects of HPV-testing on self-taken samples in the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme
Virtanen, A. (2015) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
Jacobs Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics Self-Administered Pap Smear, Selfpap ® : An Acceptable and Effective Cervical Cytology Sampling Method
Recio, F. O., Spoo, L., Crawford, P. F., Slager, T. J., Maleck, J. M., Migliozzi, J. A., & Florida, S. (2015)
Auto-prélèvement avec test HPV : une nouvelle alternative pour améliorer l’adhésion au dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus?
Bertucci, M., Dambroise, C., Satger, L., & Boulle, N. (2018) · Revue Francophone des Laboratoires · doi:10.1016/s1773-035x(18)30178-3
Self-sampling increases cervical cancer screening uptake
(2014) · PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News · doi:10.1007/s40274-014-1608-2
Evidence-based Messages Are Part of Evidence-Based Medicine: Optimizing Outreach Approaches for Cancer Screenings
Stevens, J. (2022) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.12.004
Impact budgétaire de l'utilisation de l'autotest dans le cadre du programme national de dépistage du cancer du col de l'utérus
Marchadier, A., Leleu, H., & Barré, S. (2023) · Revue d Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique · doi:10.1016/j.respe.2023.101838
Addressing Cervical Cancer Screening Through Self-Sampling and HPV Testing Among Under-Screened Women: A Case Study in the Decentralized Portuguese SettingPreprint
Pereira, S. D. G., Nobre, L., Ribeiro, M., Carvalho, P., Morais, A., Sousa, R., Moniz, A. P., Matos, F., Fernandes, G., Pimentel, J. P., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.04.05.24305323
Organized cervical cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of sending invitation letters
Teigné, D., Banaszuk, A.-S., Grimault, C., Lebon, A., Nanin, F., Gaultier, A., & Rat, C. (2024) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108150
Contemporary Status and Frontiers of Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States
Eli, A. V., Kasten, B. B., Mayer, C., Samant, R. R., Hartman, Y. E., Chaudhary, I., Imran, N., Zotto, V. L. D., Kahn, A. G., Arend, R. C., et al. (2025) · Cancer Prevention Research · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-25-0118

Authors: Haguenoer, K., Sengchanh, S., Gaudy-Graffin, C., Boyard, J., Fontenay, R., Marret, H., Goudeau, A., Pigneaux de Laroche, N., Rusch, E., & Giraudeau, B.
Affiliations: Inserm (FR)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR)
Université de Tours (FR)
Corresponding author: Haguenoer, K
ORCID: Haguenoer, K
Boyard, J
Marret, H
Giraudeau, B
Venue: British Journal of Cancer
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2014-09-23
Volume: 111
Issue: 11
Pages: 2187-2196
ISSN: 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
1532-1827
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.510
PMC: PMC4260034
OpenAlex: W2071793902
Cited by: 106
References: 41
Citations by year: 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI: 5.56
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by-nc-sa
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations: British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders: Institut National Du Cancer
National Cancer Institute
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords: cervical cancer screening, vaginal self-sampling, high-risk human papillomavirus testing, screening uptake, cost-effectiveness, Pap smear, HPV triage
MeSH terms: Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Vaginal Smears, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Vaginal self-sampling is a cost-effective way to increase participation in a cervical cancer screening programme: a randomised trial

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks