The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systemic inflammation score predicts postoperative prognosis of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates that inflammation has a crucial role in the development and progression of cancer. We developed a novel systemic inflammation score (SIS) based on preoperative serum albumin and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and examined its prognostic value for patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after surgery. METHODS: The study comprised 441 ccRCC patients undergoing nephrectomy between 2008 and 2009 in a single centre. The SIS was developed and its associations with clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: The SIS consisted of serum albumin and LMR that were both retained as independent indicators adjusting for other haematological and laboratory markers of systemic inflammation responses and traditional clinicopathological features. A high SIS was significantly associated with aggressive tumour behaviours and served as an independent prognostic factor of reduced OS. Furthermore, the SIS could significantly stratify patient prognosis in different tumour stages and Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade and necrosis scores. Incorporation of the SIS into a prognostic model including TNM stage, Fuhrman grade and lymphovascular invasion generated a nomogram, which predicted accurately 3- and 5-year survival for ccRCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The SIS as a potentially powerful prognostic biomarker might improve traditional clinicopathological analysis to refine clinical outcome prediction for ccRCC patients after surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Sica, A., & Balkwill, F. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07205 · Cited by 11,399
Gupta, D., & Lis, C. G. (2010) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-69 · Cited by 1,485
Cited by
Inflammation-Related Biomarkers for the Prediction of Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients
Yamamoto, T., Kawada, K., & Obama, K. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22158002 · Cited by 445
Nishijima, T. F., Muss, H. B., Shachar, S. S., Tamura, K., & Takamatsu, Y. (2015) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.003 · Cited by 324
Tumor-associated neutrophils and neutrophil-targeted cancer therapies
Que, H., Fu, Q., Lan, T., Tian, X., & Wei, X. (2022) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188762 · Cited by 312
Surgical trauma‐induced immunosuppression in cancer: Recent advances and the potential therapies
Tang, F., Tie, Y., Tu, C., & Wei, X. (2020) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/ctm2.24 · Cited by 206
Epigenetic remodelling shapes inflammatory renal cancer and neutrophil-dependent metastasis
Nishida, J., Momoi, Y., Miyakuni, K., Tamura, Y., Takahashi, K., Koinuma, D., Miyazono, K., & Ehata, S. (2020) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-020-0491-2 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, Y., An, H., Xu, L., Zhu, Y., Yang, Y., Lin, Z., & Xu, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2015-07-02
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 626-633
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W1841968883
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systemic inflammation score predicts postoperative prognosis of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.2015.241
- The paper
- Chang, Y., An, H., Xu, L., Zhu, Y., Yang, Y., Lin, Z., & Xu, J. (2015). Systemic inflammation score predicts postoperative prognosis of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.