Cited by 39Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Correlation of extended RAS and PIK3CA gene mutation status with outcomes from the phase III AGITG MAX STUDY involving capecitabine alone or in combination with bevacizumab plus or minus mitomycin C in advanced colorectal cancer

Open access
Price, T J, Bruhn, M A, Lee, C K, Hardingham, J E, Townsend, A R, Mann, K P, Simes, J, Weickhardt, A +7 more·2015·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mutations affecting RAS genes are now established predictive markers of nonresponse to anti-EGFR antibodies in advanced CRC. This analysis assessed the prognostic and predictive impact of extended RAS and PIK3CA gene mutation status in patients receiving capecitabine plus or minus bevacizumab (±mitomycin C) in the randomised phase III MAX study. METHODS: DNA was extracted from archival macrodissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue. Mutation status was determined using pyrosequencing, confirmed with Sanger sequencing (for equivocal RAS) and correlated with efficacy outcomes. Predictive analyses were undertaken using a test for interaction involving both C vs CB+CBM. RESULTS: Of the available 280 of the 471 (59.4%) patients, mutations in KRAS exons 2, 3 and 4 and NRAS 2, 3 and 4 were as follows: 32%, 2.9%, 2.2%, 1.4%, 0.7% and 0% (total RAS MT 39%). The PIK3CA MT rate was 7.5% exon 9 and 3.6% exon 20. Extended RAS gene mutation status (WT vs MT) had no prognostic impact for PFS (HR 0.91 (0.71-1.17)) or OS (HR 0.95 (0.71-1.25)). The RAS gene mutation status was not predictive of the effectiveness of bevacizumab for PFS (HR 0.56 (0.37-0.85) for RAS MT and HR 0.69 (0.5-0.97) for RAS WT; P for interaction 0.50). The PIK3CA mutation was neither predictive for bevacizumab effect nor prognostic. CONCLUSION: Of KRAS exon 2 WT patients, 10% had additional RAS mutations. Neither all RAS gene mutation status nor PIK3CA mutation status was prognostic for PFS or OS, or predictive of bevacizumab outcome in patients with advanced CRC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.2015.37

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, T. J., Bruhn, M. A., Lee, C. K., Hardingham, J. E., Townsend, A. R., Mann, K. P., Simes, J., Weickhardt, A., Wrin, J. W., Wilson, K., Gebski, V, Van Hazel, G., Robinson, B., Cunningham, D., & Tebbutt, N. C.
Affiliations
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Ludwig Cancer Research (AU)
  • Christchurch Hospital (NZ)
  • Royal Marsden Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Price, T J
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2015-03
Volume
112
Issue
6
Pages
963-970
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2014590712
Cited by
39
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Cancer Australia
  • Cancer Institute NSW
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
RAS mutations, PIK3CA mutation, advanced colorectal cancer, capecitabine, bevacizumab, mitomycin C, predictive biomarkers, prognostic factors, KRAS exon 2, NRAS, progression-free survival, overall survival, anti-EGFR antibody resistance
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Capecitabine, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Deoxycytidine, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Male, Mutation, Prognosis, Genes, ras, Colorectal Neoplasms, Mitomycin, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review