The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles of Safety Pharmacology
Open accessAbstract
Safety Pharmacology is a rapidly developing discipline that uses the basic principles of pharmacology in a regulatory‐driven process to generate data to inform risk/benefit assessment. The aim of Safety Pharmacology is to characterize the pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) relationship of a drug's adverse effects using continuously evolving methodology. Unlike toxicology, Safety Pharmacology includes within its remit a regulatory requirement to predict the risk of rare lethal events. This gives Safety Pharmacology its unique character. The key issues for Safety Pharmacology are detection of an adverse effect liability, projection of the data into safety margin calculation and finally clinical safety monitoring. This article sets out to explain the drivers for Safety Pharmacology so that the wider pharmacology community is better placed to understand the discipline. It concludes with a summary of principles that may help inform future resolution of unmet needs (especially establishing model validation for accurate risk assessment). Subsequent articles in this issue of the journal address specific aspects of Safety Pharmacology to explore the issues of model choice, the burden of proof and to highlight areas of intensive activity (such as testing for drug‐induced rare event liability, and the challenge of testing the safety of so‐called biologics (antibodies, gene therapy and so on.). British Journal of Pharmacology (2008) 154, 1382–1399; doi:10.1038/bjp.2008.280; published online 7 July 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neurocircuitry of addiction: an overview
Feltenstein, M. W., & See, R. E. (2008) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/bjp.2008.51 · Cited by 421
Benchmarking safety pharmacology regulatory packages and best practice
Lindgren, S., Bass, A. S., Briscoe, R., Bruse, K., Friedrichs, G. S., Kallman, M. J., Markgraf, C., Patmore, L., & Pugsley, M. K. (2008) · Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.vascn.2008.07.001 · Cited by 109
Self-citationAnimal models of ventricular arrhythmias
Hamlin, R. L. (2007) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2006.08.006 · Cited by 60
Cited by
Polypharmacology – Foe or Friend?
Peters, J.-U. (2013) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm400856t · Cited by 465
Laverty, H., Benson, C., Cartwright, E., Cross, M., Garland, C., Hammond, T., Holloway, C., McMahon, N., Milligan, J., Park, B., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01255.x · Cited by 363
Abi-Gerges, N., McMahon, C., Vargas, H., Sager, P., Chui, R., Stevens, D., Davila, J., Schaub, J. R., Wu, J. C., del Rio, C., et al. (2019) · Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.vascn.2019.106582 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Pugsley, M. K., Authier, S., & Curtis, M. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1382-1399
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W1996212925
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Safety Pharmacology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjp.2008.280
- The paper
- Pugsley, M. K., Authier, S., & Curtis, M. J. (2008). Principles of Safety Pharmacology. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjp.2008.280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.