The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective regulation of IP3-receptor-mediated Ca2+ signaling and apoptosis by the BH4 domain of Bcl-2 versus Bcl-Xl
Open accessAbstract
Antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) targets the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP(3)R) via its BH4 domain, thereby suppressing IP(3)R Ca(2+)-flux properties and protecting against Ca(2+)-dependent apoptosis. Here, we directly compared IP(3)R inhibition by BH4-Bcl-2 and BH4-Bcl-Xl. In contrast to BH4-Bcl-2, BH4-Bcl-Xl neither bound the modulatory domain of IP(3)R nor inhibited IP(3)-induced Ca(2+) release (IICR) in permeabilized and intact cells. We identified a critical residue in BH4-Bcl-2 (Lys17) not conserved in BH4-Bcl-Xl (Asp11). Changing Lys17 into Asp in BH4-Bcl-2 completely abolished its IP(3)R-binding and -inhibitory properties, whereas changing Asp11 into Lys in BH4-Bcl-Xl induced IP(3)R binding and inhibition. This difference in IP(3)R regulation between BH4-Bcl-2 and BH4-Bcl-Xl controls their antiapoptotic action. Although both BH4-Bcl-2 and BH4-Bcl-Xl had antiapoptotic activity, BH4-Bcl-2 was more potent than BH4-Bcl-Xl. The effect of BH4-Bcl-2, but not of BH4-Bcl-Xl, depended on its binding to IP(3)Rs. In agreement with the IP(3)R-binding properties, the antiapoptotic activity of BH4-Bcl-2 and BH4-Bcl-Xl was modulated by the Lys/Asp substitutions. Changing Lys17 into Asp in full-length Bcl-2 significantly decreased its binding to the IP(3)R, its ability to inhibit IICR and its protection against apoptotic stimuli. A single amino-acid difference between BH4-Bcl-2 and BH4-Bcl-Xl therefore underlies differential regulation of IP(3)Rs and Ca(2+)-driven apoptosis by these functional domains. Mutating this residue affects the function of Bcl-2 in Ca(2+) signaling and apoptosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, R. G., Bui, T., White, C., Madesh, M., Krawczyk, C. M., Lindsten, T., Hawkins, B. J., Kubek, S., Frauwirth, K. A., Wang, Y. L., et al. (2007) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.023 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Mechanisms of Action of Bcl-2 Family Proteins
Shamas-Din, A., Kale, J., Leber, B., & Andrews, D. W. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a008714 · Cited by 705
BCL-2 family: integrating stress responses at the ER to control cell demise
Pihán, P., Carreras-Sureda, A., & Hetz, C. (2017) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.82 · Cited by 274
La Rovere, R. M. L., Roest, G., Bultynck, G., & Parys, J. B. (2016) · Cell Calcium · doi:10.1016/j.ceca.2016.04.005 · Cited by 257
Self-citationMediation of the antiapoptotic activity of Bcl-xL protein upon interaction with VDAC1 protein
Arbel, N., Ben-Hail, D., & Shoshan-Barmatz, V. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.345918 · Cited by 179
Ando, H., Kawaai, K., Bonneau, B., & Mikoshiba, K. (2018) · Advances in Biological Regulation · doi:10.1016/j.jbior.2017.12.001 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Monaco, G., Decrock, E., Akl, H., Ponsaerts, R., Vervliet, T., Luyten, T., De Maeyer, M., Missiaen, L., Distelhorst, C. W., De Smedt, H., Parys, J. B., Leybaert, L., & Bultynck, G.
- Venue
- Cell Death & Differentiation
- Published
- 2011-08-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-309
- ISSN
- 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5403
- OpenAlex
- W2124979912
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.